Cargando…

Comparing the intraoperative and postoperative complications of the scalpel and electrocautery techniques for severing the inner layers of the lumbar disc during discectomy surgery

BACKGROUND: Due to the sensitivity of the surgical site and a higher probability of injury, the use of a scalpel and electrocautery to create an incision in the spine is discussed. In this study, we will compare the intraoperative and postoperative complications of the scalpel and electrocautery tec...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hajilo, Parisa, Imani, Behzad, Zandi, Shirdel, Mehrafshan, Ali
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10568066/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37841816
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fsurg.2023.1264519
_version_ 1785119275901517824
author Hajilo, Parisa
Imani, Behzad
Zandi, Shirdel
Mehrafshan, Ali
author_facet Hajilo, Parisa
Imani, Behzad
Zandi, Shirdel
Mehrafshan, Ali
author_sort Hajilo, Parisa
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Due to the sensitivity of the surgical site and a higher probability of injury, the use of a scalpel and electrocautery to create an incision in the spine is discussed. In this study, we will compare the intraoperative and postoperative complications of the scalpel and electrocautery techniques for severing the inner layers of the lumbar disc during discectomy surgery. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This study was conducted in Iran as a randomized controlled trial with double-blinding (1,401). Sixty candidates for spine surgery were randomly divided into two groups of 30 using electrocautery (A) and a scalpel (B) based on available sampling. The VAS scale was used to assess postoperative pain. The duration of the incision and intraoperative blood loss were recorded. The infection and fluid secretions were determined using the Southampton scoring scale. Utilizing the Manchester scar scale, the wound healing status was evaluated. The SPSS version 16 software was used for data analysis (t-test, Mann–Whitney U, ANOVA). RESULTS: The electrocautery group had substantially lower bleeding, pain, and wound healing rates than the scalpel group (P > 0.05). However, the electrocautery group had significantly longer surgical times, more secretions, and a higher infection rate than the scalpel group (P > 0.05). In terms of demographic and clinical characteristics, there was no significant difference between the two groups (P < 0.05). CONCLUSION: Electrocautery reduces postoperative hemorrhage and, potentially, postoperative pain in patients. However, as the duration of surgery increases, so does the duration of anesthesia, and patient safety decreases. Additionally, the risk of infection increases in the electrocautery group compared to the scalpel group, and the rate of wound healing decreases. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: https://www.irct.ir/, identifier (IRCT20230222057496N1).
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10568066
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-105680662023-10-13 Comparing the intraoperative and postoperative complications of the scalpel and electrocautery techniques for severing the inner layers of the lumbar disc during discectomy surgery Hajilo, Parisa Imani, Behzad Zandi, Shirdel Mehrafshan, Ali Front Surg Surgery BACKGROUND: Due to the sensitivity of the surgical site and a higher probability of injury, the use of a scalpel and electrocautery to create an incision in the spine is discussed. In this study, we will compare the intraoperative and postoperative complications of the scalpel and electrocautery techniques for severing the inner layers of the lumbar disc during discectomy surgery. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This study was conducted in Iran as a randomized controlled trial with double-blinding (1,401). Sixty candidates for spine surgery were randomly divided into two groups of 30 using electrocautery (A) and a scalpel (B) based on available sampling. The VAS scale was used to assess postoperative pain. The duration of the incision and intraoperative blood loss were recorded. The infection and fluid secretions were determined using the Southampton scoring scale. Utilizing the Manchester scar scale, the wound healing status was evaluated. The SPSS version 16 software was used for data analysis (t-test, Mann–Whitney U, ANOVA). RESULTS: The electrocautery group had substantially lower bleeding, pain, and wound healing rates than the scalpel group (P > 0.05). However, the electrocautery group had significantly longer surgical times, more secretions, and a higher infection rate than the scalpel group (P > 0.05). In terms of demographic and clinical characteristics, there was no significant difference between the two groups (P < 0.05). CONCLUSION: Electrocautery reduces postoperative hemorrhage and, potentially, postoperative pain in patients. However, as the duration of surgery increases, so does the duration of anesthesia, and patient safety decreases. Additionally, the risk of infection increases in the electrocautery group compared to the scalpel group, and the rate of wound healing decreases. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: https://www.irct.ir/, identifier (IRCT20230222057496N1). Frontiers Media S.A. 2023-09-28 /pmc/articles/PMC10568066/ /pubmed/37841816 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fsurg.2023.1264519 Text en © 2023 Hajilo, Imani, Zandi and Mehrafshan. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY) (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Surgery
Hajilo, Parisa
Imani, Behzad
Zandi, Shirdel
Mehrafshan, Ali
Comparing the intraoperative and postoperative complications of the scalpel and electrocautery techniques for severing the inner layers of the lumbar disc during discectomy surgery
title Comparing the intraoperative and postoperative complications of the scalpel and electrocautery techniques for severing the inner layers of the lumbar disc during discectomy surgery
title_full Comparing the intraoperative and postoperative complications of the scalpel and electrocautery techniques for severing the inner layers of the lumbar disc during discectomy surgery
title_fullStr Comparing the intraoperative and postoperative complications of the scalpel and electrocautery techniques for severing the inner layers of the lumbar disc during discectomy surgery
title_full_unstemmed Comparing the intraoperative and postoperative complications of the scalpel and electrocautery techniques for severing the inner layers of the lumbar disc during discectomy surgery
title_short Comparing the intraoperative and postoperative complications of the scalpel and electrocautery techniques for severing the inner layers of the lumbar disc during discectomy surgery
title_sort comparing the intraoperative and postoperative complications of the scalpel and electrocautery techniques for severing the inner layers of the lumbar disc during discectomy surgery
topic Surgery
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10568066/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37841816
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fsurg.2023.1264519
work_keys_str_mv AT hajiloparisa comparingtheintraoperativeandpostoperativecomplicationsofthescalpelandelectrocauterytechniquesforseveringtheinnerlayersofthelumbardiscduringdiscectomysurgery
AT imanibehzad comparingtheintraoperativeandpostoperativecomplicationsofthescalpelandelectrocauterytechniquesforseveringtheinnerlayersofthelumbardiscduringdiscectomysurgery
AT zandishirdel comparingtheintraoperativeandpostoperativecomplicationsofthescalpelandelectrocauterytechniquesforseveringtheinnerlayersofthelumbardiscduringdiscectomysurgery
AT mehrafshanali comparingtheintraoperativeandpostoperativecomplicationsofthescalpelandelectrocauterytechniquesforseveringtheinnerlayersofthelumbardiscduringdiscectomysurgery