Cargando…

청대 사회의 용의(庸醫) 문제 인식과 청말의 변화

"Yong-yi" means "quack" in English, which generally refers to a doctor who does not have good medical skills. In the Ming and Qing dynasties in China, various criticism about "Yong-yi" became popularized, and by the late Qing period, "quacks" had become a seri...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: The Korean Society for the History of Medicine 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10568162/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31092807
http://dx.doi.org/10.13081/kjmh.2019.28.191
_version_ 1785119298935586816
collection PubMed
description "Yong-yi" means "quack" in English, which generally refers to a doctor who does not have good medical skills. In the Ming and Qing dynasties in China, various criticism about "Yong-yi" became popularized, and by the late Qing period, "quacks" had become a serious social issue. The theory of traditional Chinese medicine was developed during the Ming and Qing dynasties, and local medical resources also increased. Moreover, the prevalence of medical book publishing led to the openness and generalization of medical knowledge. As a result, not only the number of doctors increased, but also the number of doctors who lack medical knowledge and clinical experience increased. However, at the outset, "Yong-yi" did not only mean doctors with poor medical skills. "Yong-yi" also reflected conflicts and contradictions between doctors. Doctors consistently criticized quacks in an attempt to maintain their identity as a "good" doctor or a Confucian doctor. In this sense, "Yong-yi" was used among physicians as an expression of discrimination and exclusion. The concept of "quackery" was also determined by the relationship between patients and doctors. In general, itinerant doctors, midwives and shaman doctors were regarded as "Yong-yi"; however, they served the medical needs of various patients. Thus, to some extent, "Yong-yi" were also useful medical resources. On the contrary, in certain situations, "shiyi," physicians who serviced a family for generations and were generally believed to be reliable and as trustworthy doctors, were also labelled as quacks, especially when the patient did not trust them or was not satisfied with the treatment. Therefore, doctors’ thoughts about "Yong-yi" did not always coincide with patients’ thoughts about "Yong-yi." However, by the late Qing period, the description of quacks in media reports found a singular connotation, and the divergent social image of quacks disappeared. By this time, quacks were uniformly described as ignorant and irresponsible Chinese medicine practitioners. Specifically, in one murder case in which a "Yong-yi" was accused as the murderer, the report unilaterally reported the patient’s claims. Consequently, Chinese medicine practitioners who failed in their treatment of patients became labeled as "quack" doctors. In newspaper reports, "Yong-yi" no longer simply referred to individual cases of "quacks" but had come to represent the entirety of the Chinese medicine practitioner community. On the contrary, Western medical doctors who replaced the status of traditional doctors were positively portrayed. Pictorials also had similar perspectives with newspapers, supporting the narrative of the news with ironic drawings and articles. Overall, media reports regarding "Yong-yi" did not focus on reporting facts, but they had the purpose of making quacks a serious social problem.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10568162
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher The Korean Society for the History of Medicine
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-105681622023-11-07 청대 사회의 용의(庸醫) 문제 인식과 청말의 변화 Uisahak Article "Yong-yi" means "quack" in English, which generally refers to a doctor who does not have good medical skills. In the Ming and Qing dynasties in China, various criticism about "Yong-yi" became popularized, and by the late Qing period, "quacks" had become a serious social issue. The theory of traditional Chinese medicine was developed during the Ming and Qing dynasties, and local medical resources also increased. Moreover, the prevalence of medical book publishing led to the openness and generalization of medical knowledge. As a result, not only the number of doctors increased, but also the number of doctors who lack medical knowledge and clinical experience increased. However, at the outset, "Yong-yi" did not only mean doctors with poor medical skills. "Yong-yi" also reflected conflicts and contradictions between doctors. Doctors consistently criticized quacks in an attempt to maintain their identity as a "good" doctor or a Confucian doctor. In this sense, "Yong-yi" was used among physicians as an expression of discrimination and exclusion. The concept of "quackery" was also determined by the relationship between patients and doctors. In general, itinerant doctors, midwives and shaman doctors were regarded as "Yong-yi"; however, they served the medical needs of various patients. Thus, to some extent, "Yong-yi" were also useful medical resources. On the contrary, in certain situations, "shiyi," physicians who serviced a family for generations and were generally believed to be reliable and as trustworthy doctors, were also labelled as quacks, especially when the patient did not trust them or was not satisfied with the treatment. Therefore, doctors’ thoughts about "Yong-yi" did not always coincide with patients’ thoughts about "Yong-yi." However, by the late Qing period, the description of quacks in media reports found a singular connotation, and the divergent social image of quacks disappeared. By this time, quacks were uniformly described as ignorant and irresponsible Chinese medicine practitioners. Specifically, in one murder case in which a "Yong-yi" was accused as the murderer, the report unilaterally reported the patient’s claims. Consequently, Chinese medicine practitioners who failed in their treatment of patients became labeled as "quack" doctors. In newspaper reports, "Yong-yi" no longer simply referred to individual cases of "quacks" but had come to represent the entirety of the Chinese medicine practitioner community. On the contrary, Western medical doctors who replaced the status of traditional doctors were positively portrayed. Pictorials also had similar perspectives with newspapers, supporting the narrative of the news with ironic drawings and articles. Overall, media reports regarding "Yong-yi" did not focus on reporting facts, but they had the purpose of making quacks a serious social problem. The Korean Society for the History of Medicine 2019-04 2019-04-30 /pmc/articles/PMC10568162/ /pubmed/31092807 http://dx.doi.org/10.13081/kjmh.2019.28.191 Text en © 대한의사학회 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) ) which permits unrestricted noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Article
청대 사회의 용의(庸醫) 문제 인식과 청말의 변화
title 청대 사회의 용의(庸醫) 문제 인식과 청말의 변화
title_full 청대 사회의 용의(庸醫) 문제 인식과 청말의 변화
title_fullStr 청대 사회의 용의(庸醫) 문제 인식과 청말의 변화
title_full_unstemmed 청대 사회의 용의(庸醫) 문제 인식과 청말의 변화
title_short 청대 사회의 용의(庸醫) 문제 인식과 청말의 변화
title_sort 청대 사회의 용의(庸醫) 문제 인식과 청말의 변화
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10568162/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31092807
http://dx.doi.org/10.13081/kjmh.2019.28.191
work_keys_str_mv AT cheongdaesahoeuiyonguiyōngyīmunjeinsiggwacheongmaluibyeonhwa