Cargando…
Comparison Between Distal Trans-radial Access and Conventional Trans-radial Access for Coronary Angiography
Background Compared with a conventional wrist puncture for radial artery catheterization, a distal radial artery puncture has the advantage of reducing the incidence of radial artery occlusion (RAO). Aim The present study was designed to evaluate the feasibility of distal trans-radial access compare...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Cureus
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10568520/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37842393 http://dx.doi.org/10.7759/cureus.45081 |
_version_ | 1785119372815106048 |
---|---|
author | Gupta, Manish Kumar, Vinit Rahman, Md Waziur Srivastava, Swati Pandey, Umeshwar Sinha, Santosh K |
author_facet | Gupta, Manish Kumar, Vinit Rahman, Md Waziur Srivastava, Swati Pandey, Umeshwar Sinha, Santosh K |
author_sort | Gupta, Manish |
collection | PubMed |
description | Background Compared with a conventional wrist puncture for radial artery catheterization, a distal radial artery puncture has the advantage of reducing the incidence of radial artery occlusion (RAO). Aim The present study was designed to evaluate the feasibility of distal trans-radial access compared with conventional trans-radial access for coronary angiography. Methods A prospective, randomized, single-blinded, comparative study was conducted at a tertiary care center in India between December 2018 and November 2020. A total of 420 patients (aged >18 years) with signs and symptoms suggestive of coronary artery disease (CAD) and with a palpable radial artery in anatomical snuffbox were randomized into two groups. Group A comprised patients accessed at the distal trans-radial site, and Group B consisted of patients accessed at the conventional trans-radial site for coronary angiography. Baseline demographics, clinical history, and risk factors for CAD were documented. Procedural-related parameters and complications were compared between the two groups. Results The procedural success rate was non-significant between Group A and Group B (96% vs. 98%; p=0.38). Puncture in a single attempt was higher in Group B compared to Group A (92% vs. 78%; p<0.001). There was no significant difference between Group A and Group B for operation time (p=0.207), fluoroscopy time (p=0.183), and contrast volume (p=0.345). The rate of RAO was higher in Group B compared to Group A (13% vs. 2%; p<0.001). Radial artery hematoma/swelling at the puncture site between Group A (10%) and Group B (8%) was not significant (p=0.61). Post-procedural hemostasis time in Group A was 28 ± 7.86 minutes, and in Group B was 24 ± 6.23 minutes. Both post-procedural persistence of pain (p<0.001) and hand clumsiness (p<0.001) were significantly higher in Group B compared to Group A. Conclusion For coronary angiography, the distal trans-radial access site is a reliable and secure alternate access site. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10568520 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | Cureus |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-105685202023-10-13 Comparison Between Distal Trans-radial Access and Conventional Trans-radial Access for Coronary Angiography Gupta, Manish Kumar, Vinit Rahman, Md Waziur Srivastava, Swati Pandey, Umeshwar Sinha, Santosh K Cureus Cardiac/Thoracic/Vascular Surgery Background Compared with a conventional wrist puncture for radial artery catheterization, a distal radial artery puncture has the advantage of reducing the incidence of radial artery occlusion (RAO). Aim The present study was designed to evaluate the feasibility of distal trans-radial access compared with conventional trans-radial access for coronary angiography. Methods A prospective, randomized, single-blinded, comparative study was conducted at a tertiary care center in India between December 2018 and November 2020. A total of 420 patients (aged >18 years) with signs and symptoms suggestive of coronary artery disease (CAD) and with a palpable radial artery in anatomical snuffbox were randomized into two groups. Group A comprised patients accessed at the distal trans-radial site, and Group B consisted of patients accessed at the conventional trans-radial site for coronary angiography. Baseline demographics, clinical history, and risk factors for CAD were documented. Procedural-related parameters and complications were compared between the two groups. Results The procedural success rate was non-significant between Group A and Group B (96% vs. 98%; p=0.38). Puncture in a single attempt was higher in Group B compared to Group A (92% vs. 78%; p<0.001). There was no significant difference between Group A and Group B for operation time (p=0.207), fluoroscopy time (p=0.183), and contrast volume (p=0.345). The rate of RAO was higher in Group B compared to Group A (13% vs. 2%; p<0.001). Radial artery hematoma/swelling at the puncture site between Group A (10%) and Group B (8%) was not significant (p=0.61). Post-procedural hemostasis time in Group A was 28 ± 7.86 minutes, and in Group B was 24 ± 6.23 minutes. Both post-procedural persistence of pain (p<0.001) and hand clumsiness (p<0.001) were significantly higher in Group B compared to Group A. Conclusion For coronary angiography, the distal trans-radial access site is a reliable and secure alternate access site. Cureus 2023-09-12 /pmc/articles/PMC10568520/ /pubmed/37842393 http://dx.doi.org/10.7759/cureus.45081 Text en Copyright © 2023, Gupta et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. |
spellingShingle | Cardiac/Thoracic/Vascular Surgery Gupta, Manish Kumar, Vinit Rahman, Md Waziur Srivastava, Swati Pandey, Umeshwar Sinha, Santosh K Comparison Between Distal Trans-radial Access and Conventional Trans-radial Access for Coronary Angiography |
title | Comparison Between Distal Trans-radial Access and Conventional Trans-radial Access for Coronary Angiography |
title_full | Comparison Between Distal Trans-radial Access and Conventional Trans-radial Access for Coronary Angiography |
title_fullStr | Comparison Between Distal Trans-radial Access and Conventional Trans-radial Access for Coronary Angiography |
title_full_unstemmed | Comparison Between Distal Trans-radial Access and Conventional Trans-radial Access for Coronary Angiography |
title_short | Comparison Between Distal Trans-radial Access and Conventional Trans-radial Access for Coronary Angiography |
title_sort | comparison between distal trans-radial access and conventional trans-radial access for coronary angiography |
topic | Cardiac/Thoracic/Vascular Surgery |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10568520/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37842393 http://dx.doi.org/10.7759/cureus.45081 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT guptamanish comparisonbetweendistaltransradialaccessandconventionaltransradialaccessforcoronaryangiography AT kumarvinit comparisonbetweendistaltransradialaccessandconventionaltransradialaccessforcoronaryangiography AT rahmanmdwaziur comparisonbetweendistaltransradialaccessandconventionaltransradialaccessforcoronaryangiography AT srivastavaswati comparisonbetweendistaltransradialaccessandconventionaltransradialaccessforcoronaryangiography AT pandeyumeshwar comparisonbetweendistaltransradialaccessandconventionaltransradialaccessforcoronaryangiography AT sinhasantoshk comparisonbetweendistaltransradialaccessandconventionaltransradialaccessforcoronaryangiography |