Cargando…

The impact of marker selection, in-line near-infrared spectroscopy (NIR), and feed mix time on the coefficient of variation (mix uniformity), body weight uniformity and broiler growth performance during the starter, grower, and finisher periods

Most feed manufacturers in the United States use the same mixing time (and thus mix uniformity) throughout the growing period regardless of age and consumption patterns. However, research evaluating the optimum mixing time requirements and novel analysis methods, such as in-line near-infrared (NIR)...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Rubio, A.A., Conrad, S., Juzaitis-Boelter, C., Wishon, C.R., Fahrenholz, A.C.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10568556/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37832185
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.psj.2023.103109
_version_ 1785119377990877184
author Rubio, A.A.
Conrad, S.
Juzaitis-Boelter, C.
Wishon, C.R.
Fahrenholz, A.C.
author_facet Rubio, A.A.
Conrad, S.
Juzaitis-Boelter, C.
Wishon, C.R.
Fahrenholz, A.C.
author_sort Rubio, A.A.
collection PubMed
description Most feed manufacturers in the United States use the same mixing time (and thus mix uniformity) throughout the growing period regardless of age and consumption patterns. However, research evaluating the optimum mixing time requirements and novel analysis methods, such as in-line near-infrared (NIR) spectroscopy, on the coefficient of variation (CV) and growth performance of broilers throughout the production phases is sparse. Two experiments were conducted to determine the effects of marker selection, in-line NIR, and varying mix times on mix uniformity, broiler growth performance, and body weight uniformity from 1 to 42 d of age. Feed was manufactured utilizing a 1,815-kg counterpoise ribbon mixer. In both experiments, feed was mixed for 4.5 min (3 min dry mix and 90 s of wet mix) and 30 s (0 s dry mix and 30 s wet mix) to obtain a standard mix (SM) and an abbreviated mix (AM), respectively. Experiment 1 constituted a 2 × 2 × 4 factorial arrangement of 2 mix times, (4.5 and 0.5 min), 2 batch sizes (908 and 1,815 kg), and 4 methodologies to evaluate mixer performance (sodium chloride, Microtracers (Red#40 and Blue#40), and in-line NIR). In experiment 2, broilers received different mix time combinations: 1) SM from 1 to 42 d, 2) SM from 1 to 28 d and AM from 28 to 42 d, 3) SM from 1 to 14 d and AM from 14 to 42 d, and 4) AM from 1 to 42 d. In both experiments, selecting a single source marker provided a more accurate estimation of mixer CV in SM and AM diets (P < 0.05). In experiment 2, mix time did not influence BW, feed intake (FI), FCR, or individual bird BW CV from 1 to 42 d of age (P > 0.05). These data indicated that mixer CV differed depending on total mix time and methodology used and diets with a reduced mix time may not necessarily influence growth performance and BW uniformity during the starter, grower, and finisher periods of broilers.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10568556
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Elsevier
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-105685562023-10-13 The impact of marker selection, in-line near-infrared spectroscopy (NIR), and feed mix time on the coefficient of variation (mix uniformity), body weight uniformity and broiler growth performance during the starter, grower, and finisher periods Rubio, A.A. Conrad, S. Juzaitis-Boelter, C. Wishon, C.R. Fahrenholz, A.C. Poult Sci METABOLISM AND NUTRITION Most feed manufacturers in the United States use the same mixing time (and thus mix uniformity) throughout the growing period regardless of age and consumption patterns. However, research evaluating the optimum mixing time requirements and novel analysis methods, such as in-line near-infrared (NIR) spectroscopy, on the coefficient of variation (CV) and growth performance of broilers throughout the production phases is sparse. Two experiments were conducted to determine the effects of marker selection, in-line NIR, and varying mix times on mix uniformity, broiler growth performance, and body weight uniformity from 1 to 42 d of age. Feed was manufactured utilizing a 1,815-kg counterpoise ribbon mixer. In both experiments, feed was mixed for 4.5 min (3 min dry mix and 90 s of wet mix) and 30 s (0 s dry mix and 30 s wet mix) to obtain a standard mix (SM) and an abbreviated mix (AM), respectively. Experiment 1 constituted a 2 × 2 × 4 factorial arrangement of 2 mix times, (4.5 and 0.5 min), 2 batch sizes (908 and 1,815 kg), and 4 methodologies to evaluate mixer performance (sodium chloride, Microtracers (Red#40 and Blue#40), and in-line NIR). In experiment 2, broilers received different mix time combinations: 1) SM from 1 to 42 d, 2) SM from 1 to 28 d and AM from 28 to 42 d, 3) SM from 1 to 14 d and AM from 14 to 42 d, and 4) AM from 1 to 42 d. In both experiments, selecting a single source marker provided a more accurate estimation of mixer CV in SM and AM diets (P < 0.05). In experiment 2, mix time did not influence BW, feed intake (FI), FCR, or individual bird BW CV from 1 to 42 d of age (P > 0.05). These data indicated that mixer CV differed depending on total mix time and methodology used and diets with a reduced mix time may not necessarily influence growth performance and BW uniformity during the starter, grower, and finisher periods of broilers. Elsevier 2023-09-16 /pmc/articles/PMC10568556/ /pubmed/37832185 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.psj.2023.103109 Text en © 2023 The Authors https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
spellingShingle METABOLISM AND NUTRITION
Rubio, A.A.
Conrad, S.
Juzaitis-Boelter, C.
Wishon, C.R.
Fahrenholz, A.C.
The impact of marker selection, in-line near-infrared spectroscopy (NIR), and feed mix time on the coefficient of variation (mix uniformity), body weight uniformity and broiler growth performance during the starter, grower, and finisher periods
title The impact of marker selection, in-line near-infrared spectroscopy (NIR), and feed mix time on the coefficient of variation (mix uniformity), body weight uniformity and broiler growth performance during the starter, grower, and finisher periods
title_full The impact of marker selection, in-line near-infrared spectroscopy (NIR), and feed mix time on the coefficient of variation (mix uniformity), body weight uniformity and broiler growth performance during the starter, grower, and finisher periods
title_fullStr The impact of marker selection, in-line near-infrared spectroscopy (NIR), and feed mix time on the coefficient of variation (mix uniformity), body weight uniformity and broiler growth performance during the starter, grower, and finisher periods
title_full_unstemmed The impact of marker selection, in-line near-infrared spectroscopy (NIR), and feed mix time on the coefficient of variation (mix uniformity), body weight uniformity and broiler growth performance during the starter, grower, and finisher periods
title_short The impact of marker selection, in-line near-infrared spectroscopy (NIR), and feed mix time on the coefficient of variation (mix uniformity), body weight uniformity and broiler growth performance during the starter, grower, and finisher periods
title_sort impact of marker selection, in-line near-infrared spectroscopy (nir), and feed mix time on the coefficient of variation (mix uniformity), body weight uniformity and broiler growth performance during the starter, grower, and finisher periods
topic METABOLISM AND NUTRITION
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10568556/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37832185
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.psj.2023.103109
work_keys_str_mv AT rubioaa theimpactofmarkerselectioninlinenearinfraredspectroscopynirandfeedmixtimeonthecoefficientofvariationmixuniformitybodyweightuniformityandbroilergrowthperformanceduringthestartergrowerandfinisherperiods
AT conrads theimpactofmarkerselectioninlinenearinfraredspectroscopynirandfeedmixtimeonthecoefficientofvariationmixuniformitybodyweightuniformityandbroilergrowthperformanceduringthestartergrowerandfinisherperiods
AT juzaitisboelterc theimpactofmarkerselectioninlinenearinfraredspectroscopynirandfeedmixtimeonthecoefficientofvariationmixuniformitybodyweightuniformityandbroilergrowthperformanceduringthestartergrowerandfinisherperiods
AT wishoncr theimpactofmarkerselectioninlinenearinfraredspectroscopynirandfeedmixtimeonthecoefficientofvariationmixuniformitybodyweightuniformityandbroilergrowthperformanceduringthestartergrowerandfinisherperiods
AT fahrenholzac theimpactofmarkerselectioninlinenearinfraredspectroscopynirandfeedmixtimeonthecoefficientofvariationmixuniformitybodyweightuniformityandbroilergrowthperformanceduringthestartergrowerandfinisherperiods
AT rubioaa impactofmarkerselectioninlinenearinfraredspectroscopynirandfeedmixtimeonthecoefficientofvariationmixuniformitybodyweightuniformityandbroilergrowthperformanceduringthestartergrowerandfinisherperiods
AT conrads impactofmarkerselectioninlinenearinfraredspectroscopynirandfeedmixtimeonthecoefficientofvariationmixuniformitybodyweightuniformityandbroilergrowthperformanceduringthestartergrowerandfinisherperiods
AT juzaitisboelterc impactofmarkerselectioninlinenearinfraredspectroscopynirandfeedmixtimeonthecoefficientofvariationmixuniformitybodyweightuniformityandbroilergrowthperformanceduringthestartergrowerandfinisherperiods
AT wishoncr impactofmarkerselectioninlinenearinfraredspectroscopynirandfeedmixtimeonthecoefficientofvariationmixuniformitybodyweightuniformityandbroilergrowthperformanceduringthestartergrowerandfinisherperiods
AT fahrenholzac impactofmarkerselectioninlinenearinfraredspectroscopynirandfeedmixtimeonthecoefficientofvariationmixuniformitybodyweightuniformityandbroilergrowthperformanceduringthestartergrowerandfinisherperiods