Cargando…

Effect of light restriction on productive results and behavior of broiler chickens

The study aimed to evaluate the effect of light restriction (18L:6D vs. 14L:10D), genotype (A vs. B), and sex on performance, behavior, and meat quality, and the occurrence of wooden breast (WB) and white striping (WS) in broiler chickens. To this purpose 704 one-day-old chickens of 2 genotypes, hal...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Gratta, F., Bošković Cabrol, M., Xiccato, G., Birolo, M., Bordignon, F., Trocino, A.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10568561/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37826901
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.psj.2023.103084
_version_ 1785119379155845120
author Gratta, F.
Bošković Cabrol, M.
Xiccato, G.
Birolo, M.
Bordignon, F.
Trocino, A.
author_facet Gratta, F.
Bošković Cabrol, M.
Xiccato, G.
Birolo, M.
Bordignon, F.
Trocino, A.
author_sort Gratta, F.
collection PubMed
description The study aimed to evaluate the effect of light restriction (18L:6D vs. 14L:10D), genotype (A vs. B), and sex on performance, behavior, and meat quality, and the occurrence of wooden breast (WB) and white striping (WS) in broiler chickens. To this purpose 704 one-day-old chickens of 2 genotypes, half males and half females, were reared from hatching until slaughtering at 45 d of age in 32 collective pens (22 chickens per pen). Light restriction reduced growth rate and final live weight (LW), but improved feed conversion ratio (FCR) (P < 0.01) and reduced inactive behaviors of chickens (P < 0.001). Light restriction also reduced WS occurrence in breasts (89.5 to 64.6%; P < 0.001) and reduced meat shear force (2.64 to 2.20 kg/g; P < 0.05) and ether extract content (2.29 to 1.87%; P < 0.05). Regarding genotype, compared to genotype B, chickens of genotype A were heavier (3,242 g vs. 3,124 g; P < 0.01) with higher cold carcass weight and Pectoralis major muscle yield (12.9 vs. 12.0%; P < 0.001) and a higher FCR (1.63 vs. 1.61; P < 0.01). Finally, females had lower final LW (2,852 g vs. 3,513 g) and higher FCR (1.64 vs. 1.59) than males (P < 0.001), but a higher proportion of breast and P. major (P < 0.001), lower cooking losses (P < 0.001) and shear force (P < 0.01), and higher protein content (21.6 vs. 20.7%; P < 0.001). In conclusion, light restriction depressed growth, but was effective in decreasing WS occurrence and improved feed conversion. The decrease in inactive behaviors (sitting/laying) of light-restricted chickens can be positively considered in view of animal welfare.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10568561
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Elsevier
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-105685612023-10-13 Effect of light restriction on productive results and behavior of broiler chickens Gratta, F. Bošković Cabrol, M. Xiccato, G. Birolo, M. Bordignon, F. Trocino, A. Poult Sci MANAGEMENT AND PRODUCTION The study aimed to evaluate the effect of light restriction (18L:6D vs. 14L:10D), genotype (A vs. B), and sex on performance, behavior, and meat quality, and the occurrence of wooden breast (WB) and white striping (WS) in broiler chickens. To this purpose 704 one-day-old chickens of 2 genotypes, half males and half females, were reared from hatching until slaughtering at 45 d of age in 32 collective pens (22 chickens per pen). Light restriction reduced growth rate and final live weight (LW), but improved feed conversion ratio (FCR) (P < 0.01) and reduced inactive behaviors of chickens (P < 0.001). Light restriction also reduced WS occurrence in breasts (89.5 to 64.6%; P < 0.001) and reduced meat shear force (2.64 to 2.20 kg/g; P < 0.05) and ether extract content (2.29 to 1.87%; P < 0.05). Regarding genotype, compared to genotype B, chickens of genotype A were heavier (3,242 g vs. 3,124 g; P < 0.01) with higher cold carcass weight and Pectoralis major muscle yield (12.9 vs. 12.0%; P < 0.001) and a higher FCR (1.63 vs. 1.61; P < 0.01). Finally, females had lower final LW (2,852 g vs. 3,513 g) and higher FCR (1.64 vs. 1.59) than males (P < 0.001), but a higher proportion of breast and P. major (P < 0.001), lower cooking losses (P < 0.001) and shear force (P < 0.01), and higher protein content (21.6 vs. 20.7%; P < 0.001). In conclusion, light restriction depressed growth, but was effective in decreasing WS occurrence and improved feed conversion. The decrease in inactive behaviors (sitting/laying) of light-restricted chickens can be positively considered in view of animal welfare. Elsevier 2023-09-01 /pmc/articles/PMC10568561/ /pubmed/37826901 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.psj.2023.103084 Text en © 2023 The Authors https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle MANAGEMENT AND PRODUCTION
Gratta, F.
Bošković Cabrol, M.
Xiccato, G.
Birolo, M.
Bordignon, F.
Trocino, A.
Effect of light restriction on productive results and behavior of broiler chickens
title Effect of light restriction on productive results and behavior of broiler chickens
title_full Effect of light restriction on productive results and behavior of broiler chickens
title_fullStr Effect of light restriction on productive results and behavior of broiler chickens
title_full_unstemmed Effect of light restriction on productive results and behavior of broiler chickens
title_short Effect of light restriction on productive results and behavior of broiler chickens
title_sort effect of light restriction on productive results and behavior of broiler chickens
topic MANAGEMENT AND PRODUCTION
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10568561/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37826901
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.psj.2023.103084
work_keys_str_mv AT grattaf effectoflightrestrictiononproductiveresultsandbehaviorofbroilerchickens
AT boskoviccabrolm effectoflightrestrictiononproductiveresultsandbehaviorofbroilerchickens
AT xiccatog effectoflightrestrictiononproductiveresultsandbehaviorofbroilerchickens
AT birolom effectoflightrestrictiononproductiveresultsandbehaviorofbroilerchickens
AT bordignonf effectoflightrestrictiononproductiveresultsandbehaviorofbroilerchickens
AT trocinoa effectoflightrestrictiononproductiveresultsandbehaviorofbroilerchickens