Cargando…

Is radical radiotherapy with/without surgery an effective treatment in the lymphoepithelial carcinoma of the salivary gland?

BACKGROUND: There is limited information of radical radiotherapy (RT) on lymphoepithelial carcinoma of salivary gland (LECSG) regarding to the rarity of the disease. We conducted this retrospective study that evaluated the feasibility and efficacy of radical RT with/without surgery in LECSG. METHODS...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Niu, Xiaoshuang, Liu, Peiyao, Wang, Xiaoshen, Hu, Chaosu
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10568878/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37828474
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12885-023-11466-1
_version_ 1785119446195503104
author Niu, Xiaoshuang
Liu, Peiyao
Wang, Xiaoshen
Hu, Chaosu
author_facet Niu, Xiaoshuang
Liu, Peiyao
Wang, Xiaoshen
Hu, Chaosu
author_sort Niu, Xiaoshuang
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: There is limited information of radical radiotherapy (RT) on lymphoepithelial carcinoma of salivary gland (LECSG) regarding to the rarity of the disease. We conducted this retrospective study that evaluated the feasibility and efficacy of radical RT with/without surgery in LECSG. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed patients that were pathologically diagnosed of LECSG and had definite or suspicious residual disease. The prescribed dose given to P-GTV and/or P-GTV-LN was 66 to 70.4 Gy. The clinical target volume (CTV) involved ipsilateral salivary gland and corresponding lymph node drainage area. RESULTS: A total of 56 patients were included. With a median follow-up of 60 months (range: 8 to 151 months), the 1-, 5-, and 10-year progression-free survival (PFS) rates were 94.6%, 84.7% and 84.7%; locoregional progression-free survival (LRPFS) rates were 98.2%, 87.4% and 87.4%; distance metastasis-free survival (DMFS) rates were 94.6%, 86.7% and 86.7%; and overall survival (OS) rates were 98.2%, 92.4% and 89.0%, respectively. A total of 7 patients without surgery were included. All patients were alive and only one patient experienced failure of distant metastasis four months after RT. The results of univariate analysis showed that compared with N stage, the number of positive lymph nodes (2 positive lymph nodes) was better prognostic predictor especially in PFS. There were no treatment-related deaths and most toxicities of RT were mild. CONCLUSIONS: Radical RT with/without surgery in LECSG for definite or suspicious residual disease is feasibility and efficacy. Most toxicities of RT were mild due to the target volume involved ipsilateral area.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10568878
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-105688782023-10-13 Is radical radiotherapy with/without surgery an effective treatment in the lymphoepithelial carcinoma of the salivary gland? Niu, Xiaoshuang Liu, Peiyao Wang, Xiaoshen Hu, Chaosu BMC Cancer Research BACKGROUND: There is limited information of radical radiotherapy (RT) on lymphoepithelial carcinoma of salivary gland (LECSG) regarding to the rarity of the disease. We conducted this retrospective study that evaluated the feasibility and efficacy of radical RT with/without surgery in LECSG. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed patients that were pathologically diagnosed of LECSG and had definite or suspicious residual disease. The prescribed dose given to P-GTV and/or P-GTV-LN was 66 to 70.4 Gy. The clinical target volume (CTV) involved ipsilateral salivary gland and corresponding lymph node drainage area. RESULTS: A total of 56 patients were included. With a median follow-up of 60 months (range: 8 to 151 months), the 1-, 5-, and 10-year progression-free survival (PFS) rates were 94.6%, 84.7% and 84.7%; locoregional progression-free survival (LRPFS) rates were 98.2%, 87.4% and 87.4%; distance metastasis-free survival (DMFS) rates were 94.6%, 86.7% and 86.7%; and overall survival (OS) rates were 98.2%, 92.4% and 89.0%, respectively. A total of 7 patients without surgery were included. All patients were alive and only one patient experienced failure of distant metastasis four months after RT. The results of univariate analysis showed that compared with N stage, the number of positive lymph nodes (2 positive lymph nodes) was better prognostic predictor especially in PFS. There were no treatment-related deaths and most toxicities of RT were mild. CONCLUSIONS: Radical RT with/without surgery in LECSG for definite or suspicious residual disease is feasibility and efficacy. Most toxicities of RT were mild due to the target volume involved ipsilateral area. BioMed Central 2023-10-12 /pmc/articles/PMC10568878/ /pubmed/37828474 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12885-023-11466-1 Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research
Niu, Xiaoshuang
Liu, Peiyao
Wang, Xiaoshen
Hu, Chaosu
Is radical radiotherapy with/without surgery an effective treatment in the lymphoepithelial carcinoma of the salivary gland?
title Is radical radiotherapy with/without surgery an effective treatment in the lymphoepithelial carcinoma of the salivary gland?
title_full Is radical radiotherapy with/without surgery an effective treatment in the lymphoepithelial carcinoma of the salivary gland?
title_fullStr Is radical radiotherapy with/without surgery an effective treatment in the lymphoepithelial carcinoma of the salivary gland?
title_full_unstemmed Is radical radiotherapy with/without surgery an effective treatment in the lymphoepithelial carcinoma of the salivary gland?
title_short Is radical radiotherapy with/without surgery an effective treatment in the lymphoepithelial carcinoma of the salivary gland?
title_sort is radical radiotherapy with/without surgery an effective treatment in the lymphoepithelial carcinoma of the salivary gland?
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10568878/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37828474
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12885-023-11466-1
work_keys_str_mv AT niuxiaoshuang isradicalradiotherapywithwithoutsurgeryaneffectivetreatmentinthelymphoepithelialcarcinomaofthesalivarygland
AT liupeiyao isradicalradiotherapywithwithoutsurgeryaneffectivetreatmentinthelymphoepithelialcarcinomaofthesalivarygland
AT wangxiaoshen isradicalradiotherapywithwithoutsurgeryaneffectivetreatmentinthelymphoepithelialcarcinomaofthesalivarygland
AT huchaosu isradicalradiotherapywithwithoutsurgeryaneffectivetreatmentinthelymphoepithelialcarcinomaofthesalivarygland