Cargando…
Feasibility of Carbon Dioxide Storage Resource Use within Climate Change Mitigation Scenarios for the United States
[Image: see text] To progress decarbonization in the United States, numerous techno-economic models that project CO(2) storage deployment at annual injection rates of 0.3–1.7 Gt year(–1) by 2050 have been built. However, these models do not consider many geological, technical, or socio-economic fact...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
American Chemical Society
2023
|
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10569028/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37750675 http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.3c00790 |
_version_ | 1785119479649271808 |
---|---|
author | Zhang, Yuting Jackson, Christopher Darraj, Nihal Krevor, Samuel |
author_facet | Zhang, Yuting Jackson, Christopher Darraj, Nihal Krevor, Samuel |
author_sort | Zhang, Yuting |
collection | PubMed |
description | [Image: see text] To progress decarbonization in the United States, numerous techno-economic models that project CO(2) storage deployment at annual injection rates of 0.3–1.7 Gt year(–1) by 2050 have been built. However, these models do not consider many geological, technical, or socio-economic factors that could impede the growth of geological storage resource use, and there is uncertainty about the feasibility of the resulting projections. Here, we evaluate storage scenarios across four major modeling efforts. We apply a growth modeling framework using logistic curves to analyze the feasibility of growth trajectories under constraints imposed by the associated storage resource availability. We show that storage resources are abundant, and resources of the Gulf Coast alone would be sufficient to meet national demand were it not for transport limitations. On the contrary, deployment trajectories require sustained average annual (exponential) growth at rates of >10% nationally for two of the three reports and between 3% and 20% regionally across four storage hubs projected in both reports with regional resolution. These rates are high relative to historical rates of growth in analogous large scale energy infrastructure in the United States. Projections for California appear to be particularly infeasible. Future modeling efforts should be constrained to more realistic deployment trajectories, which could be done with simple constraints from the type of modeling framework presented here. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10569028 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | American Chemical Society |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-105690282023-10-13 Feasibility of Carbon Dioxide Storage Resource Use within Climate Change Mitigation Scenarios for the United States Zhang, Yuting Jackson, Christopher Darraj, Nihal Krevor, Samuel Environ Sci Technol [Image: see text] To progress decarbonization in the United States, numerous techno-economic models that project CO(2) storage deployment at annual injection rates of 0.3–1.7 Gt year(–1) by 2050 have been built. However, these models do not consider many geological, technical, or socio-economic factors that could impede the growth of geological storage resource use, and there is uncertainty about the feasibility of the resulting projections. Here, we evaluate storage scenarios across four major modeling efforts. We apply a growth modeling framework using logistic curves to analyze the feasibility of growth trajectories under constraints imposed by the associated storage resource availability. We show that storage resources are abundant, and resources of the Gulf Coast alone would be sufficient to meet national demand were it not for transport limitations. On the contrary, deployment trajectories require sustained average annual (exponential) growth at rates of >10% nationally for two of the three reports and between 3% and 20% regionally across four storage hubs projected in both reports with regional resolution. These rates are high relative to historical rates of growth in analogous large scale energy infrastructure in the United States. Projections for California appear to be particularly infeasible. Future modeling efforts should be constrained to more realistic deployment trajectories, which could be done with simple constraints from the type of modeling framework presented here. American Chemical Society 2023-09-26 /pmc/articles/PMC10569028/ /pubmed/37750675 http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.3c00790 Text en © 2023 The Authors. Published by American Chemical Society https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Permits the broadest form of re-use including for commercial purposes, provided that author attribution and integrity are maintained (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Zhang, Yuting Jackson, Christopher Darraj, Nihal Krevor, Samuel Feasibility of Carbon Dioxide Storage Resource Use within Climate Change Mitigation Scenarios for the United States |
title | Feasibility of Carbon
Dioxide Storage Resource Use
within Climate Change Mitigation Scenarios for the United States |
title_full | Feasibility of Carbon
Dioxide Storage Resource Use
within Climate Change Mitigation Scenarios for the United States |
title_fullStr | Feasibility of Carbon
Dioxide Storage Resource Use
within Climate Change Mitigation Scenarios for the United States |
title_full_unstemmed | Feasibility of Carbon
Dioxide Storage Resource Use
within Climate Change Mitigation Scenarios for the United States |
title_short | Feasibility of Carbon
Dioxide Storage Resource Use
within Climate Change Mitigation Scenarios for the United States |
title_sort | feasibility of carbon
dioxide storage resource use
within climate change mitigation scenarios for the united states |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10569028/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37750675 http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.3c00790 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT zhangyuting feasibilityofcarbondioxidestorageresourceusewithinclimatechangemitigationscenariosfortheunitedstates AT jacksonchristopher feasibilityofcarbondioxidestorageresourceusewithinclimatechangemitigationscenariosfortheunitedstates AT darrajnihal feasibilityofcarbondioxidestorageresourceusewithinclimatechangemitigationscenariosfortheunitedstates AT krevorsamuel feasibilityofcarbondioxidestorageresourceusewithinclimatechangemitigationscenariosfortheunitedstates |