Cargando…

Evaluating differences in density estimation for central Iowa butterflies using two methodologies

The Pollard-Yates transect is a widely used method for sampling butterflies. Data from these traditional transects are analyzed to produce density estimates, which are then used to make inferences about population status or trends. A key assumption of the Pollard-Yates transect is that detection pro...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Patterson, Shane, Harris, Jonathan, Dinsmore, Stephen, Kinkead, Karen
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: PeerJ Inc. 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10569161/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37842044
http://dx.doi.org/10.7717/peerj.16165
_version_ 1785119501744865280
author Patterson, Shane
Harris, Jonathan
Dinsmore, Stephen
Kinkead, Karen
author_facet Patterson, Shane
Harris, Jonathan
Dinsmore, Stephen
Kinkead, Karen
author_sort Patterson, Shane
collection PubMed
description The Pollard-Yates transect is a widely used method for sampling butterflies. Data from these traditional transects are analyzed to produce density estimates, which are then used to make inferences about population status or trends. A key assumption of the Pollard-Yates transect is that detection probability is 1.0, or constant but unknown, out to a fixed distance (generally 2.5 m on either side of a transect line). However, species-specific estimates of detection probability would allow for sampling at farther distances, resulting in more detections of individuals. Our objectives were to (1) evaluate butterfly density estimates derived from Pollard-Yates line transects and distance sampling, (2) estimate how detection probabilities for butterflies vary across sampling distances and butterfly wing lengths, and (3) offer advice on future butterfly sampling techniques to estimate population density. We conducted Pollard-Yates transects and distance-sampling transects in central Iowa in 2014. For comparison to densities derived from Pollard-Yates transects, we used Program DISTANCE to model detection probability (p) and estimate density (D) for eight butterfly species representing a range of morphological characteristics. We found that detection probability among species varied beyond 2.5 m, with variation apparent even within 5 m of the line. Such variation correlated with wing size, where species with larger wing size generally had higher detection probabilities. Distance sampling estimated higher densities at the 5-m truncation for five of the eight species tested. At this truncation, detection probability was <0.8 for all species, and ranged from 0.53 to 0.79. With the exception of the little yellow (Pyrisitia lisa), species with median wing length <5.0 mm had the lowest detection probabilities. We recommend that researchers integrate distance sampling into butterfly sampling and monitoring, particularly for studies utilizing survey transects >5 m wide and when smaller species are targeted.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10569161
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher PeerJ Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-105691612023-10-13 Evaluating differences in density estimation for central Iowa butterflies using two methodologies Patterson, Shane Harris, Jonathan Dinsmore, Stephen Kinkead, Karen PeerJ Conservation Biology The Pollard-Yates transect is a widely used method for sampling butterflies. Data from these traditional transects are analyzed to produce density estimates, which are then used to make inferences about population status or trends. A key assumption of the Pollard-Yates transect is that detection probability is 1.0, or constant but unknown, out to a fixed distance (generally 2.5 m on either side of a transect line). However, species-specific estimates of detection probability would allow for sampling at farther distances, resulting in more detections of individuals. Our objectives were to (1) evaluate butterfly density estimates derived from Pollard-Yates line transects and distance sampling, (2) estimate how detection probabilities for butterflies vary across sampling distances and butterfly wing lengths, and (3) offer advice on future butterfly sampling techniques to estimate population density. We conducted Pollard-Yates transects and distance-sampling transects in central Iowa in 2014. For comparison to densities derived from Pollard-Yates transects, we used Program DISTANCE to model detection probability (p) and estimate density (D) for eight butterfly species representing a range of morphological characteristics. We found that detection probability among species varied beyond 2.5 m, with variation apparent even within 5 m of the line. Such variation correlated with wing size, where species with larger wing size generally had higher detection probabilities. Distance sampling estimated higher densities at the 5-m truncation for five of the eight species tested. At this truncation, detection probability was <0.8 for all species, and ranged from 0.53 to 0.79. With the exception of the little yellow (Pyrisitia lisa), species with median wing length <5.0 mm had the lowest detection probabilities. We recommend that researchers integrate distance sampling into butterfly sampling and monitoring, particularly for studies utilizing survey transects >5 m wide and when smaller species are targeted. PeerJ Inc. 2023-10-09 /pmc/articles/PMC10569161/ /pubmed/37842044 http://dx.doi.org/10.7717/peerj.16165 Text en ©2023 Patterson et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) , which permits using, remixing, and building upon the work non-commercially, as long as it is properly attributed. For attribution, the original author(s), title, publication source (PeerJ) and either DOI or URL of the article must be cited.
spellingShingle Conservation Biology
Patterson, Shane
Harris, Jonathan
Dinsmore, Stephen
Kinkead, Karen
Evaluating differences in density estimation for central Iowa butterflies using two methodologies
title Evaluating differences in density estimation for central Iowa butterflies using two methodologies
title_full Evaluating differences in density estimation for central Iowa butterflies using two methodologies
title_fullStr Evaluating differences in density estimation for central Iowa butterflies using two methodologies
title_full_unstemmed Evaluating differences in density estimation for central Iowa butterflies using two methodologies
title_short Evaluating differences in density estimation for central Iowa butterflies using two methodologies
title_sort evaluating differences in density estimation for central iowa butterflies using two methodologies
topic Conservation Biology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10569161/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37842044
http://dx.doi.org/10.7717/peerj.16165
work_keys_str_mv AT pattersonshane evaluatingdifferencesindensityestimationforcentraliowabutterfliesusingtwomethodologies
AT harrisjonathan evaluatingdifferencesindensityestimationforcentraliowabutterfliesusingtwomethodologies
AT dinsmorestephen evaluatingdifferencesindensityestimationforcentraliowabutterfliesusingtwomethodologies
AT kinkeadkaren evaluatingdifferencesindensityestimationforcentraliowabutterfliesusingtwomethodologies