Cargando…

Survival outcomes and mobilization during venovenous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation: a retrospective cohort study

INTRODUCTION: Venovenous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (V-V ECMO) can be considered in critically ill patient in severe pulmonary failure. However, the mobilization of patients on V-V ECMO can be challenging due to logistic and safety concerns. This study aimed to investigate whether 30 days s...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Rottmann, Felix A., Noe, Christian, Bemtgen, Xavier, Maier, Sven, Supady, Alexander, Wengenmayer, Tobias, Staudacher, Dawid L.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10569171/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37841002
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fmed.2023.1271540
_version_ 1785119503681585152
author Rottmann, Felix A.
Noe, Christian
Bemtgen, Xavier
Maier, Sven
Supady, Alexander
Wengenmayer, Tobias
Staudacher, Dawid L.
author_facet Rottmann, Felix A.
Noe, Christian
Bemtgen, Xavier
Maier, Sven
Supady, Alexander
Wengenmayer, Tobias
Staudacher, Dawid L.
author_sort Rottmann, Felix A.
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: Venovenous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (V-V ECMO) can be considered in critically ill patient in severe pulmonary failure. However, the mobilization of patients on V-V ECMO can be challenging due to logistic and safety concerns. This study aimed to investigate whether 30 days survival was improved in patients who were mobilized during V-V ECMO support. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective cohort all-comer study that included all patients cannulated for V-V ECMO at a single center. Patients with a V-V ECMO duration below 24 h were excluded from the analysis. The patients were grouped based on the ICU mobility scale documented during V-V ECMO support. The primary endpoint was 30 days survival, and secondary endpoints included weaning from ECMO and mechanical ventilation, as well as hospital survival. RESULTS: A total of 343 patients were included in the study, with a median age of 56 years and 32% were female. Among them, 28% had chronic lung disease. The ICU mobilization scale ≥2 during ECMO was documented in 62/343 (18%) patients. There were no significant differences in age, gender and preexisting lung disease. Duration of ICU stay (13.1 vs. 15.6 days), time on ECMO (186 vs. 190 h) and mechanical ventilation (11.2 vs. 13.6 days) were slightly shorter in patients with ICU mobility scale <2 compared to those with ≥2 (all p = 0.0001). However, patients with ICU mobilization scale ≥2 showed significantly better 30 days survival (71.0 vs. 48.0%, OR 2.6 (1.5 to 4.8), p = 0.0012) compared to those with <2. In the ≥2 mobility scale group, a significantly higher number of patients were successfully weaned from the ventilator (61.3 vs. 46.6%, OR 1.8 (1.0 to 3.2), p = 0.049). A stronger correlation was observed between more intense mobilizations, such as being in a standing position (OR 5.0 (1.7 to 14.0), p = 0.0038), and higher 30 days survival. CONCLUSION: The findings of this study suggest that active mobilization during V-V ECMO support is associated with improved 30 days survival and successful weaning from the respirator. Incorporating mobilization as part of the therapeutic approach during ECMO support may offer potential benefits for critically ill patients.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10569171
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-105691712023-10-13 Survival outcomes and mobilization during venovenous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation: a retrospective cohort study Rottmann, Felix A. Noe, Christian Bemtgen, Xavier Maier, Sven Supady, Alexander Wengenmayer, Tobias Staudacher, Dawid L. Front Med (Lausanne) Medicine INTRODUCTION: Venovenous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (V-V ECMO) can be considered in critically ill patient in severe pulmonary failure. However, the mobilization of patients on V-V ECMO can be challenging due to logistic and safety concerns. This study aimed to investigate whether 30 days survival was improved in patients who were mobilized during V-V ECMO support. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective cohort all-comer study that included all patients cannulated for V-V ECMO at a single center. Patients with a V-V ECMO duration below 24 h were excluded from the analysis. The patients were grouped based on the ICU mobility scale documented during V-V ECMO support. The primary endpoint was 30 days survival, and secondary endpoints included weaning from ECMO and mechanical ventilation, as well as hospital survival. RESULTS: A total of 343 patients were included in the study, with a median age of 56 years and 32% were female. Among them, 28% had chronic lung disease. The ICU mobilization scale ≥2 during ECMO was documented in 62/343 (18%) patients. There were no significant differences in age, gender and preexisting lung disease. Duration of ICU stay (13.1 vs. 15.6 days), time on ECMO (186 vs. 190 h) and mechanical ventilation (11.2 vs. 13.6 days) were slightly shorter in patients with ICU mobility scale <2 compared to those with ≥2 (all p = 0.0001). However, patients with ICU mobilization scale ≥2 showed significantly better 30 days survival (71.0 vs. 48.0%, OR 2.6 (1.5 to 4.8), p = 0.0012) compared to those with <2. In the ≥2 mobility scale group, a significantly higher number of patients were successfully weaned from the ventilator (61.3 vs. 46.6%, OR 1.8 (1.0 to 3.2), p = 0.049). A stronger correlation was observed between more intense mobilizations, such as being in a standing position (OR 5.0 (1.7 to 14.0), p = 0.0038), and higher 30 days survival. CONCLUSION: The findings of this study suggest that active mobilization during V-V ECMO support is associated with improved 30 days survival and successful weaning from the respirator. Incorporating mobilization as part of the therapeutic approach during ECMO support may offer potential benefits for critically ill patients. Frontiers Media S.A. 2023-09-28 /pmc/articles/PMC10569171/ /pubmed/37841002 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fmed.2023.1271540 Text en Copyright © 2023 Rottmann, Noe, Bemtgen, Maier, Supady, Wengenmayer and Staudacher. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Medicine
Rottmann, Felix A.
Noe, Christian
Bemtgen, Xavier
Maier, Sven
Supady, Alexander
Wengenmayer, Tobias
Staudacher, Dawid L.
Survival outcomes and mobilization during venovenous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation: a retrospective cohort study
title Survival outcomes and mobilization during venovenous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation: a retrospective cohort study
title_full Survival outcomes and mobilization during venovenous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation: a retrospective cohort study
title_fullStr Survival outcomes and mobilization during venovenous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation: a retrospective cohort study
title_full_unstemmed Survival outcomes and mobilization during venovenous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation: a retrospective cohort study
title_short Survival outcomes and mobilization during venovenous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation: a retrospective cohort study
title_sort survival outcomes and mobilization during venovenous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation: a retrospective cohort study
topic Medicine
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10569171/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37841002
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fmed.2023.1271540
work_keys_str_mv AT rottmannfelixa survivaloutcomesandmobilizationduringvenovenousextracorporealmembraneoxygenationaretrospectivecohortstudy
AT noechristian survivaloutcomesandmobilizationduringvenovenousextracorporealmembraneoxygenationaretrospectivecohortstudy
AT bemtgenxavier survivaloutcomesandmobilizationduringvenovenousextracorporealmembraneoxygenationaretrospectivecohortstudy
AT maiersven survivaloutcomesandmobilizationduringvenovenousextracorporealmembraneoxygenationaretrospectivecohortstudy
AT supadyalexander survivaloutcomesandmobilizationduringvenovenousextracorporealmembraneoxygenationaretrospectivecohortstudy
AT wengenmayertobias survivaloutcomesandmobilizationduringvenovenousextracorporealmembraneoxygenationaretrospectivecohortstudy
AT staudacherdawidl survivaloutcomesandmobilizationduringvenovenousextracorporealmembraneoxygenationaretrospectivecohortstudy