Cargando…

Outcomes of Early Oral Feeding Compared to Delayed Feeding in Children after Elective Distal Bowel Anastomosis

BACKGROUND: Conventionally, oral feeds after distal bowel anastomosis surgery (ileostomy/colostomy closure) are delayed until after bowel peristalsis is established. The safety of an early feeding regimen is not established in children. This study compared early feeding regimens with delayed feeding...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Jayakumar, T. K., Rathod, Kirtikumar J., Eradi, Bala, Sinha, Arvind
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Wolters Kluwer - Medknow 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10569283/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37842224
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/jiaps.jiaps_19_23
_version_ 1785119520029933568
author Jayakumar, T. K.
Rathod, Kirtikumar J.
Eradi, Bala
Sinha, Arvind
author_facet Jayakumar, T. K.
Rathod, Kirtikumar J.
Eradi, Bala
Sinha, Arvind
author_sort Jayakumar, T. K.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Conventionally, oral feeds after distal bowel anastomosis surgery (ileostomy/colostomy closure) are delayed until after bowel peristalsis is established. The safety of an early feeding regimen is not established in children. This study compared early feeding regimens with delayed feeding in children undergoing elective intestinal anastomosis surgeries. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In this retrospective multicentric cohort study, children undergoing elective distal bowel anastomosis surgery were divided into Group A (oral feeds allowed within 6 h) and Group B (delayed feeds). The two groups were compared for the incidence of abdomen distension, vomiting, surgical site infection, duration of analgesia, length of hospital stay, and readmission rate. RESULTS: During the study, 58 patients were included: Group A (n = 26) and Group B (n = 32). The duration of analgesia (1.9 vs. 4.01 days) and length of hospital stay (3.38 vs. 5.0 days) were significantly less in Group A. Abdominal distension (7.7% vs. 15.6%), vomiting (11.5% vs. 15.6%), surgical site infection rate (3.8% vs. 12.5%), and readmissions (0% vs. 3.1%) were less in Group A, but statistically not significant. CONCLUSION: Early feeding after the elective restoration of distal bowel continuity can be safely practiced in the pediatric population. It is associated with a reduced need for analgesia and shorter hospital stay.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10569283
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Wolters Kluwer - Medknow
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-105692832023-10-13 Outcomes of Early Oral Feeding Compared to Delayed Feeding in Children after Elective Distal Bowel Anastomosis Jayakumar, T. K. Rathod, Kirtikumar J. Eradi, Bala Sinha, Arvind J Indian Assoc Pediatr Surg Original Article BACKGROUND: Conventionally, oral feeds after distal bowel anastomosis surgery (ileostomy/colostomy closure) are delayed until after bowel peristalsis is established. The safety of an early feeding regimen is not established in children. This study compared early feeding regimens with delayed feeding in children undergoing elective intestinal anastomosis surgeries. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In this retrospective multicentric cohort study, children undergoing elective distal bowel anastomosis surgery were divided into Group A (oral feeds allowed within 6 h) and Group B (delayed feeds). The two groups were compared for the incidence of abdomen distension, vomiting, surgical site infection, duration of analgesia, length of hospital stay, and readmission rate. RESULTS: During the study, 58 patients were included: Group A (n = 26) and Group B (n = 32). The duration of analgesia (1.9 vs. 4.01 days) and length of hospital stay (3.38 vs. 5.0 days) were significantly less in Group A. Abdominal distension (7.7% vs. 15.6%), vomiting (11.5% vs. 15.6%), surgical site infection rate (3.8% vs. 12.5%), and readmissions (0% vs. 3.1%) were less in Group A, but statistically not significant. CONCLUSION: Early feeding after the elective restoration of distal bowel continuity can be safely practiced in the pediatric population. It is associated with a reduced need for analgesia and shorter hospital stay. Wolters Kluwer - Medknow 2023 2023-09-05 /pmc/articles/PMC10569283/ /pubmed/37842224 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/jiaps.jiaps_19_23 Text en Copyright: © 2023 Journal of Indian Association of Pediatric Surgeons https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/This is an open access journal, and articles are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as appropriate credit is given and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.
spellingShingle Original Article
Jayakumar, T. K.
Rathod, Kirtikumar J.
Eradi, Bala
Sinha, Arvind
Outcomes of Early Oral Feeding Compared to Delayed Feeding in Children after Elective Distal Bowel Anastomosis
title Outcomes of Early Oral Feeding Compared to Delayed Feeding in Children after Elective Distal Bowel Anastomosis
title_full Outcomes of Early Oral Feeding Compared to Delayed Feeding in Children after Elective Distal Bowel Anastomosis
title_fullStr Outcomes of Early Oral Feeding Compared to Delayed Feeding in Children after Elective Distal Bowel Anastomosis
title_full_unstemmed Outcomes of Early Oral Feeding Compared to Delayed Feeding in Children after Elective Distal Bowel Anastomosis
title_short Outcomes of Early Oral Feeding Compared to Delayed Feeding in Children after Elective Distal Bowel Anastomosis
title_sort outcomes of early oral feeding compared to delayed feeding in children after elective distal bowel anastomosis
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10569283/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37842224
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/jiaps.jiaps_19_23
work_keys_str_mv AT jayakumartk outcomesofearlyoralfeedingcomparedtodelayedfeedinginchildrenafterelectivedistalbowelanastomosis
AT rathodkirtikumarj outcomesofearlyoralfeedingcomparedtodelayedfeedinginchildrenafterelectivedistalbowelanastomosis
AT eradibala outcomesofearlyoralfeedingcomparedtodelayedfeedinginchildrenafterelectivedistalbowelanastomosis
AT sinhaarvind outcomesofearlyoralfeedingcomparedtodelayedfeedinginchildrenafterelectivedistalbowelanastomosis