Cargando…
Outcomes of Early Oral Feeding Compared to Delayed Feeding in Children after Elective Distal Bowel Anastomosis
BACKGROUND: Conventionally, oral feeds after distal bowel anastomosis surgery (ileostomy/colostomy closure) are delayed until after bowel peristalsis is established. The safety of an early feeding regimen is not established in children. This study compared early feeding regimens with delayed feeding...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Wolters Kluwer - Medknow
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10569283/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37842224 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/jiaps.jiaps_19_23 |
_version_ | 1785119520029933568 |
---|---|
author | Jayakumar, T. K. Rathod, Kirtikumar J. Eradi, Bala Sinha, Arvind |
author_facet | Jayakumar, T. K. Rathod, Kirtikumar J. Eradi, Bala Sinha, Arvind |
author_sort | Jayakumar, T. K. |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Conventionally, oral feeds after distal bowel anastomosis surgery (ileostomy/colostomy closure) are delayed until after bowel peristalsis is established. The safety of an early feeding regimen is not established in children. This study compared early feeding regimens with delayed feeding in children undergoing elective intestinal anastomosis surgeries. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In this retrospective multicentric cohort study, children undergoing elective distal bowel anastomosis surgery were divided into Group A (oral feeds allowed within 6 h) and Group B (delayed feeds). The two groups were compared for the incidence of abdomen distension, vomiting, surgical site infection, duration of analgesia, length of hospital stay, and readmission rate. RESULTS: During the study, 58 patients were included: Group A (n = 26) and Group B (n = 32). The duration of analgesia (1.9 vs. 4.01 days) and length of hospital stay (3.38 vs. 5.0 days) were significantly less in Group A. Abdominal distension (7.7% vs. 15.6%), vomiting (11.5% vs. 15.6%), surgical site infection rate (3.8% vs. 12.5%), and readmissions (0% vs. 3.1%) were less in Group A, but statistically not significant. CONCLUSION: Early feeding after the elective restoration of distal bowel continuity can be safely practiced in the pediatric population. It is associated with a reduced need for analgesia and shorter hospital stay. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10569283 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | Wolters Kluwer - Medknow |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-105692832023-10-13 Outcomes of Early Oral Feeding Compared to Delayed Feeding in Children after Elective Distal Bowel Anastomosis Jayakumar, T. K. Rathod, Kirtikumar J. Eradi, Bala Sinha, Arvind J Indian Assoc Pediatr Surg Original Article BACKGROUND: Conventionally, oral feeds after distal bowel anastomosis surgery (ileostomy/colostomy closure) are delayed until after bowel peristalsis is established. The safety of an early feeding regimen is not established in children. This study compared early feeding regimens with delayed feeding in children undergoing elective intestinal anastomosis surgeries. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In this retrospective multicentric cohort study, children undergoing elective distal bowel anastomosis surgery were divided into Group A (oral feeds allowed within 6 h) and Group B (delayed feeds). The two groups were compared for the incidence of abdomen distension, vomiting, surgical site infection, duration of analgesia, length of hospital stay, and readmission rate. RESULTS: During the study, 58 patients were included: Group A (n = 26) and Group B (n = 32). The duration of analgesia (1.9 vs. 4.01 days) and length of hospital stay (3.38 vs. 5.0 days) were significantly less in Group A. Abdominal distension (7.7% vs. 15.6%), vomiting (11.5% vs. 15.6%), surgical site infection rate (3.8% vs. 12.5%), and readmissions (0% vs. 3.1%) were less in Group A, but statistically not significant. CONCLUSION: Early feeding after the elective restoration of distal bowel continuity can be safely practiced in the pediatric population. It is associated with a reduced need for analgesia and shorter hospital stay. Wolters Kluwer - Medknow 2023 2023-09-05 /pmc/articles/PMC10569283/ /pubmed/37842224 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/jiaps.jiaps_19_23 Text en Copyright: © 2023 Journal of Indian Association of Pediatric Surgeons https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/This is an open access journal, and articles are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as appropriate credit is given and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms. |
spellingShingle | Original Article Jayakumar, T. K. Rathod, Kirtikumar J. Eradi, Bala Sinha, Arvind Outcomes of Early Oral Feeding Compared to Delayed Feeding in Children after Elective Distal Bowel Anastomosis |
title | Outcomes of Early Oral Feeding Compared to Delayed Feeding in Children after Elective Distal Bowel Anastomosis |
title_full | Outcomes of Early Oral Feeding Compared to Delayed Feeding in Children after Elective Distal Bowel Anastomosis |
title_fullStr | Outcomes of Early Oral Feeding Compared to Delayed Feeding in Children after Elective Distal Bowel Anastomosis |
title_full_unstemmed | Outcomes of Early Oral Feeding Compared to Delayed Feeding in Children after Elective Distal Bowel Anastomosis |
title_short | Outcomes of Early Oral Feeding Compared to Delayed Feeding in Children after Elective Distal Bowel Anastomosis |
title_sort | outcomes of early oral feeding compared to delayed feeding in children after elective distal bowel anastomosis |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10569283/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37842224 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/jiaps.jiaps_19_23 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT jayakumartk outcomesofearlyoralfeedingcomparedtodelayedfeedinginchildrenafterelectivedistalbowelanastomosis AT rathodkirtikumarj outcomesofearlyoralfeedingcomparedtodelayedfeedinginchildrenafterelectivedistalbowelanastomosis AT eradibala outcomesofearlyoralfeedingcomparedtodelayedfeedinginchildrenafterelectivedistalbowelanastomosis AT sinhaarvind outcomesofearlyoralfeedingcomparedtodelayedfeedinginchildrenafterelectivedistalbowelanastomosis |