Cargando…

Premolar Extraction Affects Mandibular Kinematics

Objectives  The practice of premolar extraction in orthodontics is controversial for its potential detrimental effects on the stomatognathic system. However, the ways in which premolar extraction affects mandibular function are still poorly understood. The purpose of this study was to assess the inf...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Londoño, Alejandra, Assis, Miguel, Fornai, Cinzia, Greven, Markus
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Thieme Medical and Scientific Publishers Pvt. Ltd. 2022
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10569881/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36167318
http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/s-0042-1755629
_version_ 1785119639004512256
author Londoño, Alejandra
Assis, Miguel
Fornai, Cinzia
Greven, Markus
author_facet Londoño, Alejandra
Assis, Miguel
Fornai, Cinzia
Greven, Markus
author_sort Londoño, Alejandra
collection PubMed
description Objectives  The practice of premolar extraction in orthodontics is controversial for its potential detrimental effects on the stomatognathic system. However, the ways in which premolar extraction affects mandibular function are still poorly understood. The purpose of this study was to assess the influence of premolar extraction on mandibular kinematics by evaluating axiographic tracings. Materials and Methods  Forty-five orthodontically treated patients with premolar teeth extraction were compared with 45 paired untreated controls, selected for the absence of malocclusions. Systematic three-dimensional axiographic recordings of the mandibular movements were performed for protrusive–retrusive movements and speech. The transversal deviations and length of the movements were recorded for both sides along with the rotation angle during speech. Statistical Analysis  Differences between the axiographic variables were analyzed via the permutation test and Wilcoxon rank-sum test. Linear regression was performed to test whether axiographic parameters were predictive of group affiliation. Dot plots were used to explore the distribution of each of the axiographic outcomes, and isometric principal component analysis to assess the differences between the cumulative effects of premolar extraction on jaw motion. Results  The mandibular lateral translation in protrusion–retrusion and speech, the amount of rotation as well as the length of mandibular movements during speech were significantly higher in the treated subjects than in the controls, while retral stability did not differ. The linear regression yielded significant results for the mandibular lateral translation in protrusion–retrusion. The isometric principal component analysis showed higher values of the axiographic variables for 11 out of 45 individuals in the study sample compared with the control group. Conclusions  Premolar extraction altered mandibular kinematics in at least 25% of the cases within our sample, and the transversal discrepancy between protrusive and retrusive tracings was even predictive of group affiliation. These results support the notion that the routine practice of premolar extraction as part of the orthodontic treatment should be discouraged. It is compelling to perform further studies to assess whether a disrupted kinematics of the mandible is associated to temporomandibular disorders.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10569881
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Thieme Medical and Scientific Publishers Pvt. Ltd.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-105698812023-10-13 Premolar Extraction Affects Mandibular Kinematics Londoño, Alejandra Assis, Miguel Fornai, Cinzia Greven, Markus Eur J Dent Objectives  The practice of premolar extraction in orthodontics is controversial for its potential detrimental effects on the stomatognathic system. However, the ways in which premolar extraction affects mandibular function are still poorly understood. The purpose of this study was to assess the influence of premolar extraction on mandibular kinematics by evaluating axiographic tracings. Materials and Methods  Forty-five orthodontically treated patients with premolar teeth extraction were compared with 45 paired untreated controls, selected for the absence of malocclusions. Systematic three-dimensional axiographic recordings of the mandibular movements were performed for protrusive–retrusive movements and speech. The transversal deviations and length of the movements were recorded for both sides along with the rotation angle during speech. Statistical Analysis  Differences between the axiographic variables were analyzed via the permutation test and Wilcoxon rank-sum test. Linear regression was performed to test whether axiographic parameters were predictive of group affiliation. Dot plots were used to explore the distribution of each of the axiographic outcomes, and isometric principal component analysis to assess the differences between the cumulative effects of premolar extraction on jaw motion. Results  The mandibular lateral translation in protrusion–retrusion and speech, the amount of rotation as well as the length of mandibular movements during speech were significantly higher in the treated subjects than in the controls, while retral stability did not differ. The linear regression yielded significant results for the mandibular lateral translation in protrusion–retrusion. The isometric principal component analysis showed higher values of the axiographic variables for 11 out of 45 individuals in the study sample compared with the control group. Conclusions  Premolar extraction altered mandibular kinematics in at least 25% of the cases within our sample, and the transversal discrepancy between protrusive and retrusive tracings was even predictive of group affiliation. These results support the notion that the routine practice of premolar extraction as part of the orthodontic treatment should be discouraged. It is compelling to perform further studies to assess whether a disrupted kinematics of the mandible is associated to temporomandibular disorders. Thieme Medical and Scientific Publishers Pvt. Ltd. 2022-09-27 /pmc/articles/PMC10569881/ /pubmed/36167318 http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/s-0042-1755629 Text en The Author(s). This is an open access article published by Thieme under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, permitting unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction so long as the original work is properly cited. ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ ) https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Londoño, Alejandra
Assis, Miguel
Fornai, Cinzia
Greven, Markus
Premolar Extraction Affects Mandibular Kinematics
title Premolar Extraction Affects Mandibular Kinematics
title_full Premolar Extraction Affects Mandibular Kinematics
title_fullStr Premolar Extraction Affects Mandibular Kinematics
title_full_unstemmed Premolar Extraction Affects Mandibular Kinematics
title_short Premolar Extraction Affects Mandibular Kinematics
title_sort premolar extraction affects mandibular kinematics
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10569881/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36167318
http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/s-0042-1755629
work_keys_str_mv AT londonoalejandra premolarextractionaffectsmandibularkinematics
AT assismiguel premolarextractionaffectsmandibularkinematics
AT fornaicinzia premolarextractionaffectsmandibularkinematics
AT grevenmarkus premolarextractionaffectsmandibularkinematics