A randomized phase III study of docetaxel alone versus docetaxel plus S‐1 in patients with previously treated non‐small cell lung cancer: JMTO LC09‐01

BACKGROUND: This study evaluated the efficacy and safety of the combination chemotherapy of docetaxel plus S‐1 in patients with previously treated non‐small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) compared to docetaxel alone. METHODS: Patients with previously treated NSCLC were randomly assigned to docetaxel alone (arm A) or a combination of docetaxel and S‐1 (arm B) for a maximum of four cycles. The primary endpoint was overall survival (OS). RESULTS: The study was terminated early because of poor accrual. The number of patients evaluated were 74 and 77 in arm A and arm B, respectively. The median OS was 9.8 months (95% confidence interval [CI]: 6.8–15.2) and 12.3 months (95% CI: 9.2–14.5) in arms A and B, respectively. In arms A and B, the median progression‐free survival was 3.5 months (95% CI: 2.7–4.0) and 4.1 months (95% CI: 3.2–4.7), respectively. No statistically significant difference was observed in OS (hazard ratio [HR]: 0.984, 95% CI: 0.682–1.419, p = 0.4569) or progression‐free survival (HR: 0.823, 95% CI: 0.528–1.282, p = 0.0953). The major toxicity was myelosuppression. The incidence of grade 3 or more neutropenia was higher in arm A than in arm B (44.6% vs. 35.1%). However, the incidence of grade 3 or more febrile neutropenia and infection with neutropenia (12.2% vs. 22.1%) was more frequently observed in arm B. CONCLUSIONS: The prematurely terminated study did not show the benefit of two cytotoxic agents over single‐agent therapy for previously treated NSCLC patients.