Cargando…

Life cycle assessment and cost-benefit analysis of nature-based solutions for contaminated land remediation: A mini-review

Nature-based solutions (NbS) have gained significant attention as a promising approach for remediating contaminated lands, offering multiple ecosystem services (ESs) benefits beyond pollution mitigation. However, the quantitative sustainability assessment of NbS remediation systems, particularly wit...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Alshehri, Khaled, Gao, Zhenghui, Harbottle, Michael, Sapsford, Devin, Cleall, Peter
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10569992/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37842596
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e20632
_version_ 1785119665314332672
author Alshehri, Khaled
Gao, Zhenghui
Harbottle, Michael
Sapsford, Devin
Cleall, Peter
author_facet Alshehri, Khaled
Gao, Zhenghui
Harbottle, Michael
Sapsford, Devin
Cleall, Peter
author_sort Alshehri, Khaled
collection PubMed
description Nature-based solutions (NbS) have gained significant attention as a promising approach for remediating contaminated lands, offering multiple ecosystem services (ESs) benefits beyond pollution mitigation. However, the quantitative sustainability assessment of NbS remediation systems, particularly with regard to post-remediation impacts, remains limited. This mini-review aims to address the existing gaps in the assessment of NbS remediation systems by evaluating the limitations of life cycle assessment (LCA) and cost-benefit analysis (CBA) methodologies. A systematic literature search was conducted resulting in the review of 44 relevant studies published between 2006 and 2023. The review highlights an increasing trend in the coverage in the sustainability assessment literature of NbS remediation systems. Phytoextraction was identified as the main NbS mechanism employed in 65 % of the reviewed works, targeting contaminants such as heavy metals and hydrocarbons. However, the post-remediation aspects, including impacts on ESs and the end-of-life management of NbS biomass, were often neglected in the assessments with only a subset of studies partially exploring such aspects. The findings underscore the need for a comprehensive and integrated approach to assess the sustainability of NbS remediation systems, including the incorporation of economic factors, site-specific considerations, and post-remediation impacts. Addressing these gaps will enhance the understanding of NbS effectiveness and facilitate informed decision-making for contaminated land remediation.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10569992
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Elsevier
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-105699922023-10-14 Life cycle assessment and cost-benefit analysis of nature-based solutions for contaminated land remediation: A mini-review Alshehri, Khaled Gao, Zhenghui Harbottle, Michael Sapsford, Devin Cleall, Peter Heliyon Review Article Nature-based solutions (NbS) have gained significant attention as a promising approach for remediating contaminated lands, offering multiple ecosystem services (ESs) benefits beyond pollution mitigation. However, the quantitative sustainability assessment of NbS remediation systems, particularly with regard to post-remediation impacts, remains limited. This mini-review aims to address the existing gaps in the assessment of NbS remediation systems by evaluating the limitations of life cycle assessment (LCA) and cost-benefit analysis (CBA) methodologies. A systematic literature search was conducted resulting in the review of 44 relevant studies published between 2006 and 2023. The review highlights an increasing trend in the coverage in the sustainability assessment literature of NbS remediation systems. Phytoextraction was identified as the main NbS mechanism employed in 65 % of the reviewed works, targeting contaminants such as heavy metals and hydrocarbons. However, the post-remediation aspects, including impacts on ESs and the end-of-life management of NbS biomass, were often neglected in the assessments with only a subset of studies partially exploring such aspects. The findings underscore the need for a comprehensive and integrated approach to assess the sustainability of NbS remediation systems, including the incorporation of economic factors, site-specific considerations, and post-remediation impacts. Addressing these gaps will enhance the understanding of NbS effectiveness and facilitate informed decision-making for contaminated land remediation. Elsevier 2023-10-05 /pmc/articles/PMC10569992/ /pubmed/37842596 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e20632 Text en © 2023 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Review Article
Alshehri, Khaled
Gao, Zhenghui
Harbottle, Michael
Sapsford, Devin
Cleall, Peter
Life cycle assessment and cost-benefit analysis of nature-based solutions for contaminated land remediation: A mini-review
title Life cycle assessment and cost-benefit analysis of nature-based solutions for contaminated land remediation: A mini-review
title_full Life cycle assessment and cost-benefit analysis of nature-based solutions for contaminated land remediation: A mini-review
title_fullStr Life cycle assessment and cost-benefit analysis of nature-based solutions for contaminated land remediation: A mini-review
title_full_unstemmed Life cycle assessment and cost-benefit analysis of nature-based solutions for contaminated land remediation: A mini-review
title_short Life cycle assessment and cost-benefit analysis of nature-based solutions for contaminated land remediation: A mini-review
title_sort life cycle assessment and cost-benefit analysis of nature-based solutions for contaminated land remediation: a mini-review
topic Review Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10569992/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37842596
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e20632
work_keys_str_mv AT alshehrikhaled lifecycleassessmentandcostbenefitanalysisofnaturebasedsolutionsforcontaminatedlandremediationaminireview
AT gaozhenghui lifecycleassessmentandcostbenefitanalysisofnaturebasedsolutionsforcontaminatedlandremediationaminireview
AT harbottlemichael lifecycleassessmentandcostbenefitanalysisofnaturebasedsolutionsforcontaminatedlandremediationaminireview
AT sapsforddevin lifecycleassessmentandcostbenefitanalysisofnaturebasedsolutionsforcontaminatedlandremediationaminireview
AT cleallpeter lifecycleassessmentandcostbenefitanalysisofnaturebasedsolutionsforcontaminatedlandremediationaminireview