Cargando…

Systematic Literature Review and Indirect Treatment Comparison of Three Ready-to-Use Glucagon Treatments for Severe Hypoglycemia

INTRODUCTION: Ready-to-use glucagon represents a significant advancement in the management of severe hypoglycemia for people with diabetes and their caregivers. This indirect treatment comparison (ITC) evaluated the efficacy and safety differences among the three ready-to-use glucagon treatments, Ba...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Giménez, Marga, Khunti, Kamlesh, Matsuhisa, Munehide, Chenji, Suresh, Syring, Kristen, Yan, Yu
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Healthcare 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10570215/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37707700
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s13300-023-01466-6
_version_ 1785119713609646080
author Giménez, Marga
Khunti, Kamlesh
Matsuhisa, Munehide
Chenji, Suresh
Syring, Kristen
Yan, Yu
author_facet Giménez, Marga
Khunti, Kamlesh
Matsuhisa, Munehide
Chenji, Suresh
Syring, Kristen
Yan, Yu
author_sort Giménez, Marga
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: Ready-to-use glucagon represents a significant advancement in the management of severe hypoglycemia for people with diabetes and their caregivers. This indirect treatment comparison (ITC) evaluated the efficacy and safety differences among the three ready-to-use glucagon treatments, Baqsimi(®) (nasal glucagon), Gvoke(®) (glucagon injection) and Zegalogue(®) (dasiglucagon injection), in adults and children with type 1 diabetes (T1D) or type 2 diabetes (T2D). METHODS: A systematic literature review was conducted to identify randomized clinical trials assessing the efficacy and safety of Baqsimi, Gvoke or Zegalogue versus reconstituted, injectable glucagon (IG) in reversing insulin-induced hypoglycemia. Bayesian fixed-effect network meta-analysis was used to perform the ITC. Study endpoints included proportion of participants achieving treatment success, maximum blood glucose achieved, time to achieve treatment success and maximum blood glucose and treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAE). RESULTS: Ten clinical trials were included in the ITC (four for Baqsimi, three for Gvoke, and three for Zegalogue). All three treatments achieved high proportions of treatment success (> 98%). In adults, the efficacy results from combined T1D and T2D analysis were consistent with the T1D analysis, except statistically significantly faster in achieving treatment success for Baqsimi vs Gvoke in the combined analysis (13.96 vs 14.66 min). The mean maximum blood glucose values were also statistically significantly lower for Baqsimi (168 mg/dl) vs Gvoke (220 mg/dl) and Zegalogue (190 mg/dl). There was a trend towards a lower number of adults experiencing ≥ 1 TEAE with Baqsimi compared to Gvoke or Zegalogue, but no statistical significance was reached. CONCLUSION: Baqsimi, Gvoke and Zegalogue had comparable high proportions of treatment success in reversing insulin-induced hypoglycemia. Baqsimi achieved a lower mean maximum blood glucose value, which may have implications for the re-establishment of euglycemia. These findings may help support patients, caregivers and health care providers in their decision-making process when discussing various ready-to-use glucagon treatment options. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s13300-023-01466-6.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10570215
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Springer Healthcare
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-105702152023-10-14 Systematic Literature Review and Indirect Treatment Comparison of Three Ready-to-Use Glucagon Treatments for Severe Hypoglycemia Giménez, Marga Khunti, Kamlesh Matsuhisa, Munehide Chenji, Suresh Syring, Kristen Yan, Yu Diabetes Ther Review INTRODUCTION: Ready-to-use glucagon represents a significant advancement in the management of severe hypoglycemia for people with diabetes and their caregivers. This indirect treatment comparison (ITC) evaluated the efficacy and safety differences among the three ready-to-use glucagon treatments, Baqsimi(®) (nasal glucagon), Gvoke(®) (glucagon injection) and Zegalogue(®) (dasiglucagon injection), in adults and children with type 1 diabetes (T1D) or type 2 diabetes (T2D). METHODS: A systematic literature review was conducted to identify randomized clinical trials assessing the efficacy and safety of Baqsimi, Gvoke or Zegalogue versus reconstituted, injectable glucagon (IG) in reversing insulin-induced hypoglycemia. Bayesian fixed-effect network meta-analysis was used to perform the ITC. Study endpoints included proportion of participants achieving treatment success, maximum blood glucose achieved, time to achieve treatment success and maximum blood glucose and treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAE). RESULTS: Ten clinical trials were included in the ITC (four for Baqsimi, three for Gvoke, and three for Zegalogue). All three treatments achieved high proportions of treatment success (> 98%). In adults, the efficacy results from combined T1D and T2D analysis were consistent with the T1D analysis, except statistically significantly faster in achieving treatment success for Baqsimi vs Gvoke in the combined analysis (13.96 vs 14.66 min). The mean maximum blood glucose values were also statistically significantly lower for Baqsimi (168 mg/dl) vs Gvoke (220 mg/dl) and Zegalogue (190 mg/dl). There was a trend towards a lower number of adults experiencing ≥ 1 TEAE with Baqsimi compared to Gvoke or Zegalogue, but no statistical significance was reached. CONCLUSION: Baqsimi, Gvoke and Zegalogue had comparable high proportions of treatment success in reversing insulin-induced hypoglycemia. Baqsimi achieved a lower mean maximum blood glucose value, which may have implications for the re-establishment of euglycemia. These findings may help support patients, caregivers and health care providers in their decision-making process when discussing various ready-to-use glucagon treatment options. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s13300-023-01466-6. Springer Healthcare 2023-09-14 2023-11 /pmc/articles/PMC10570215/ /pubmed/37707700 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s13300-023-01466-6 Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License, which permits any non-commercial use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Review
Giménez, Marga
Khunti, Kamlesh
Matsuhisa, Munehide
Chenji, Suresh
Syring, Kristen
Yan, Yu
Systematic Literature Review and Indirect Treatment Comparison of Three Ready-to-Use Glucagon Treatments for Severe Hypoglycemia
title Systematic Literature Review and Indirect Treatment Comparison of Three Ready-to-Use Glucagon Treatments for Severe Hypoglycemia
title_full Systematic Literature Review and Indirect Treatment Comparison of Three Ready-to-Use Glucagon Treatments for Severe Hypoglycemia
title_fullStr Systematic Literature Review and Indirect Treatment Comparison of Three Ready-to-Use Glucagon Treatments for Severe Hypoglycemia
title_full_unstemmed Systematic Literature Review and Indirect Treatment Comparison of Three Ready-to-Use Glucagon Treatments for Severe Hypoglycemia
title_short Systematic Literature Review and Indirect Treatment Comparison of Three Ready-to-Use Glucagon Treatments for Severe Hypoglycemia
title_sort systematic literature review and indirect treatment comparison of three ready-to-use glucagon treatments for severe hypoglycemia
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10570215/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37707700
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s13300-023-01466-6
work_keys_str_mv AT gimenezmarga systematicliteraturereviewandindirecttreatmentcomparisonofthreereadytouseglucagontreatmentsforseverehypoglycemia
AT khuntikamlesh systematicliteraturereviewandindirecttreatmentcomparisonofthreereadytouseglucagontreatmentsforseverehypoglycemia
AT matsuhisamunehide systematicliteraturereviewandindirecttreatmentcomparisonofthreereadytouseglucagontreatmentsforseverehypoglycemia
AT chenjisuresh systematicliteraturereviewandindirecttreatmentcomparisonofthreereadytouseglucagontreatmentsforseverehypoglycemia
AT syringkristen systematicliteraturereviewandindirecttreatmentcomparisonofthreereadytouseglucagontreatmentsforseverehypoglycemia
AT yanyu systematicliteraturereviewandindirecttreatmentcomparisonofthreereadytouseglucagontreatmentsforseverehypoglycemia