Cargando…

Expert judgement of collaborative cloud classroom quality and its criteria using the many-facets rasch model

Collaborative Cloud Classroom (3CR) is an educational application that provides flexibility in the learning process. This specialized tool is designed to improve analytical and teambuilding skills, as well as enable students to document ideas, which are subsequently developed into bubble diagrams an...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ramadhani, Rahmi, Syahputra, Edi, Simamora, Elmanani, Soeharto, Soeharto
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10570598/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37842603
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e20596
_version_ 1785119804231778304
author Ramadhani, Rahmi
Syahputra, Edi
Simamora, Elmanani
Soeharto, Soeharto
author_facet Ramadhani, Rahmi
Syahputra, Edi
Simamora, Elmanani
Soeharto, Soeharto
author_sort Ramadhani, Rahmi
collection PubMed
description Collaborative Cloud Classroom (3CR) is an educational application that provides flexibility in the learning process. This specialized tool is designed to improve analytical and teambuilding skills, as well as enable students to document ideas, which are subsequently developed into bubble diagrams and text outlines. This study aims to assess and analyze the menu qualities possessed by the 3CR application using the Many-Facet Rasch Model (MFRM) analysis using 5 raters and 6 menus. A rating assessment was applied to 5 criteria, namely usability, functionality, visual communication, learning design, and security. In this case, a total of 135 from 150 data points were coded into FACETS software. The results showed that the six menus in the 3CR application were valid and reliable, as well as met the quality standards of learning tools. Security criteria were also the most difficult standards for raters to measure in all the application menus. The study also found that Rater A was more severe, and Rater E was more lenient in rating the 3CR menu. Rater B has overfitting and detected bias between rater gender and 3CR's menu (Discussion Forum and Learning Reflection menu) based on MFRM analysis.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10570598
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Elsevier
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-105705982023-10-14 Expert judgement of collaborative cloud classroom quality and its criteria using the many-facets rasch model Ramadhani, Rahmi Syahputra, Edi Simamora, Elmanani Soeharto, Soeharto Heliyon Research Article Collaborative Cloud Classroom (3CR) is an educational application that provides flexibility in the learning process. This specialized tool is designed to improve analytical and teambuilding skills, as well as enable students to document ideas, which are subsequently developed into bubble diagrams and text outlines. This study aims to assess and analyze the menu qualities possessed by the 3CR application using the Many-Facet Rasch Model (MFRM) analysis using 5 raters and 6 menus. A rating assessment was applied to 5 criteria, namely usability, functionality, visual communication, learning design, and security. In this case, a total of 135 from 150 data points were coded into FACETS software. The results showed that the six menus in the 3CR application were valid and reliable, as well as met the quality standards of learning tools. Security criteria were also the most difficult standards for raters to measure in all the application menus. The study also found that Rater A was more severe, and Rater E was more lenient in rating the 3CR menu. Rater B has overfitting and detected bias between rater gender and 3CR's menu (Discussion Forum and Learning Reflection menu) based on MFRM analysis. Elsevier 2023-10-05 /pmc/articles/PMC10570598/ /pubmed/37842603 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e20596 Text en © 2023 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Research Article
Ramadhani, Rahmi
Syahputra, Edi
Simamora, Elmanani
Soeharto, Soeharto
Expert judgement of collaborative cloud classroom quality and its criteria using the many-facets rasch model
title Expert judgement of collaborative cloud classroom quality and its criteria using the many-facets rasch model
title_full Expert judgement of collaborative cloud classroom quality and its criteria using the many-facets rasch model
title_fullStr Expert judgement of collaborative cloud classroom quality and its criteria using the many-facets rasch model
title_full_unstemmed Expert judgement of collaborative cloud classroom quality and its criteria using the many-facets rasch model
title_short Expert judgement of collaborative cloud classroom quality and its criteria using the many-facets rasch model
title_sort expert judgement of collaborative cloud classroom quality and its criteria using the many-facets rasch model
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10570598/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37842603
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e20596
work_keys_str_mv AT ramadhanirahmi expertjudgementofcollaborativecloudclassroomqualityanditscriteriausingthemanyfacetsraschmodel
AT syahputraedi expertjudgementofcollaborativecloudclassroomqualityanditscriteriausingthemanyfacetsraschmodel
AT simamoraelmanani expertjudgementofcollaborativecloudclassroomqualityanditscriteriausingthemanyfacetsraschmodel
AT soehartosoeharto expertjudgementofcollaborativecloudclassroomqualityanditscriteriausingthemanyfacetsraschmodel