Cargando…

Cost-effectiveness analysis of atezolizumab in patients with non-small-cell lung cancer ineligible for treatment with a platinum-containing regimen: a United Kingdom health care perspective

BACKGROUND: Cost-effectiveness of atezolizumab, as a treatment for advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients who cannot receive a platinum-containing regimen,was still unknown. Our objective was to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of atezolizumab vs. chemotherapy in this indication from th...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Jiang, Yunlin, Zhao, Mingye, Xi, Jiayi, Li, Jiaqi, Tang, Wenxi, Zheng, Xueping
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10570614/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37841712
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2023.1282374
_version_ 1785119808006651904
author Jiang, Yunlin
Zhao, Mingye
Xi, Jiayi
Li, Jiaqi
Tang, Wenxi
Zheng, Xueping
author_facet Jiang, Yunlin
Zhao, Mingye
Xi, Jiayi
Li, Jiaqi
Tang, Wenxi
Zheng, Xueping
author_sort Jiang, Yunlin
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Cost-effectiveness of atezolizumab, as a treatment for advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients who cannot receive a platinum-containing regimen,was still unknown. Our objective was to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of atezolizumab vs. chemotherapy in this indication from the perspective of UK healthcare system. METHODS: From the global, randomised, open-label, phase III IPSOS trial, clinical inputs and patient characteristics were obtained. A partitioned survival model with three health states was built: Progression-free survival, progressed disease and death. A lifetime time horizon was applied, with an annual discount rate of 3.5%. Additionally, the willingness-to-pay threshold of £50,000/QALY was utilized. Primary outcomes were quality-adjusted life-year (QALY), costs, and incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER). Sensitivity, scenario, and subgroup analyses were used to assess the reliability of base-case results. Price simulations were carried out in order to provide information for the pricing strategy at specific willingness-to-pay threshold. RESULTS: In the base-case analysis, atezolizumab resulted in a gain of 0.28 QALYs and an ICER of £94,873/QALY compared to chemotherapy, demonstrating no cost-effectiveness. Price simulation results revealed that atezolizumab would be preferred at a price lower than £2,215 (a reduction of 41.8%) at the willingness-to-pay threshold of £50,000. Sensitivity, scenario and subgroup analyses revealed these conclusions were generally robust, the model was most sensitive to the price of atezolizumab and subsequent medication. Furthermore, atezolizumab was found to be more cost-effective for patients displaying a positive PD-L1 expression, with an ICER of £72,098/QALY as compared to chemotherapy. CONCLUSION: Atezolizumab is not cost-effective for patients with advanced NSCLC ineligible for platinum-containing regimen, potential price reduction is necessary.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10570614
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-105706142023-10-14 Cost-effectiveness analysis of atezolizumab in patients with non-small-cell lung cancer ineligible for treatment with a platinum-containing regimen: a United Kingdom health care perspective Jiang, Yunlin Zhao, Mingye Xi, Jiayi Li, Jiaqi Tang, Wenxi Zheng, Xueping Front Public Health Public Health BACKGROUND: Cost-effectiveness of atezolizumab, as a treatment for advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients who cannot receive a platinum-containing regimen,was still unknown. Our objective was to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of atezolizumab vs. chemotherapy in this indication from the perspective of UK healthcare system. METHODS: From the global, randomised, open-label, phase III IPSOS trial, clinical inputs and patient characteristics were obtained. A partitioned survival model with three health states was built: Progression-free survival, progressed disease and death. A lifetime time horizon was applied, with an annual discount rate of 3.5%. Additionally, the willingness-to-pay threshold of £50,000/QALY was utilized. Primary outcomes were quality-adjusted life-year (QALY), costs, and incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER). Sensitivity, scenario, and subgroup analyses were used to assess the reliability of base-case results. Price simulations were carried out in order to provide information for the pricing strategy at specific willingness-to-pay threshold. RESULTS: In the base-case analysis, atezolizumab resulted in a gain of 0.28 QALYs and an ICER of £94,873/QALY compared to chemotherapy, demonstrating no cost-effectiveness. Price simulation results revealed that atezolizumab would be preferred at a price lower than £2,215 (a reduction of 41.8%) at the willingness-to-pay threshold of £50,000. Sensitivity, scenario and subgroup analyses revealed these conclusions were generally robust, the model was most sensitive to the price of atezolizumab and subsequent medication. Furthermore, atezolizumab was found to be more cost-effective for patients displaying a positive PD-L1 expression, with an ICER of £72,098/QALY as compared to chemotherapy. CONCLUSION: Atezolizumab is not cost-effective for patients with advanced NSCLC ineligible for platinum-containing regimen, potential price reduction is necessary. Frontiers Media S.A. 2023-09-29 /pmc/articles/PMC10570614/ /pubmed/37841712 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2023.1282374 Text en Copyright © 2023 Jiang, Zhao, Xi, Li, Tang and Zheng. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Public Health
Jiang, Yunlin
Zhao, Mingye
Xi, Jiayi
Li, Jiaqi
Tang, Wenxi
Zheng, Xueping
Cost-effectiveness analysis of atezolizumab in patients with non-small-cell lung cancer ineligible for treatment with a platinum-containing regimen: a United Kingdom health care perspective
title Cost-effectiveness analysis of atezolizumab in patients with non-small-cell lung cancer ineligible for treatment with a platinum-containing regimen: a United Kingdom health care perspective
title_full Cost-effectiveness analysis of atezolizumab in patients with non-small-cell lung cancer ineligible for treatment with a platinum-containing regimen: a United Kingdom health care perspective
title_fullStr Cost-effectiveness analysis of atezolizumab in patients with non-small-cell lung cancer ineligible for treatment with a platinum-containing regimen: a United Kingdom health care perspective
title_full_unstemmed Cost-effectiveness analysis of atezolizumab in patients with non-small-cell lung cancer ineligible for treatment with a platinum-containing regimen: a United Kingdom health care perspective
title_short Cost-effectiveness analysis of atezolizumab in patients with non-small-cell lung cancer ineligible for treatment with a platinum-containing regimen: a United Kingdom health care perspective
title_sort cost-effectiveness analysis of atezolizumab in patients with non-small-cell lung cancer ineligible for treatment with a platinum-containing regimen: a united kingdom health care perspective
topic Public Health
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10570614/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37841712
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2023.1282374
work_keys_str_mv AT jiangyunlin costeffectivenessanalysisofatezolizumabinpatientswithnonsmallcelllungcancerineligiblefortreatmentwithaplatinumcontainingregimenaunitedkingdomhealthcareperspective
AT zhaomingye costeffectivenessanalysisofatezolizumabinpatientswithnonsmallcelllungcancerineligiblefortreatmentwithaplatinumcontainingregimenaunitedkingdomhealthcareperspective
AT xijiayi costeffectivenessanalysisofatezolizumabinpatientswithnonsmallcelllungcancerineligiblefortreatmentwithaplatinumcontainingregimenaunitedkingdomhealthcareperspective
AT lijiaqi costeffectivenessanalysisofatezolizumabinpatientswithnonsmallcelllungcancerineligiblefortreatmentwithaplatinumcontainingregimenaunitedkingdomhealthcareperspective
AT tangwenxi costeffectivenessanalysisofatezolizumabinpatientswithnonsmallcelllungcancerineligiblefortreatmentwithaplatinumcontainingregimenaunitedkingdomhealthcareperspective
AT zhengxueping costeffectivenessanalysisofatezolizumabinpatientswithnonsmallcelllungcancerineligiblefortreatmentwithaplatinumcontainingregimenaunitedkingdomhealthcareperspective