Cargando…

Instrumented lumbar fusion in patients over 75 years of age: is it worthwhile?—a comparative study of the improvement in quality of life between elderly and young patients

BACKGROUND: Surgical treatment of degenerative lumbar disease in the elderly is controversial. Elderly patients have an increased risk for medical and surgical complications commensurate with their comorbidities, and concerns over complications have led to frequent cases of insufficient decompressio...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Tomé-Bermejo, Félix, Moreno-Mateo, Fernando, Piñera-Parrilla, Ángel, Cervera-Irimia, Javier, Mengis-Palleck, Charles Louis, Gallego-Bustos, Jesús, Garzón-Márquez, Francisco, Rodríguez-Arguisjuela, María G., Sanz-Aguilera, Sylvia, de la Rosa-Zabala, Kelman Luis, Avilés-Morente, Carmen, Oliveros-Escudero, Beatriz, Núñez-Torrealba, Alexa Anaís, Alvarez-Galovich, Luis
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: AME Publishing Company 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10570654/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37841795
http://dx.doi.org/10.21037/jss-22-115
_version_ 1785119816893333504
author Tomé-Bermejo, Félix
Moreno-Mateo, Fernando
Piñera-Parrilla, Ángel
Cervera-Irimia, Javier
Mengis-Palleck, Charles Louis
Gallego-Bustos, Jesús
Garzón-Márquez, Francisco
Rodríguez-Arguisjuela, María G.
Sanz-Aguilera, Sylvia
de la Rosa-Zabala, Kelman Luis
Avilés-Morente, Carmen
Oliveros-Escudero, Beatriz
Núñez-Torrealba, Alexa Anaís
Alvarez-Galovich, Luis
author_facet Tomé-Bermejo, Félix
Moreno-Mateo, Fernando
Piñera-Parrilla, Ángel
Cervera-Irimia, Javier
Mengis-Palleck, Charles Louis
Gallego-Bustos, Jesús
Garzón-Márquez, Francisco
Rodríguez-Arguisjuela, María G.
Sanz-Aguilera, Sylvia
de la Rosa-Zabala, Kelman Luis
Avilés-Morente, Carmen
Oliveros-Escudero, Beatriz
Núñez-Torrealba, Alexa Anaís
Alvarez-Galovich, Luis
author_sort Tomé-Bermejo, Félix
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Surgical treatment of degenerative lumbar disease in the elderly is controversial. Elderly patients have an increased risk for medical and surgical complications commensurate with their comorbidities, and concerns over complications have led to frequent cases of insufficient decompression to avoid the need for instrumentation. The purpose of this study was to evaluate clinical outcome between older and younger patients undergoing lumbar instrumented arthrodesis. METHODS: This is a retrospective, comparative study of prospectively collected outcomes. One hundred and fifty-four patients underwent 1- or 2-level posterolateral lumbar fusion. Patients were divided into two groups. Group 1: 87 patients ≤65 years of age who underwent decompression and posterolateral instrumented fusion; Group 2: 67 patients ≥75 years of age who underwent the same procedures with polymethylmethacrylate (PMMA) pedicle-screw augmentation. Mean follow-up 27.47 months (range, 76–24 months). RESULTS: Mean age was 49.1 years old (range, 24–65) for the younger group and 77.8 (range, 75–86) in the elderly group. Patients ≥75 years of age showed higher preoperative comorbidity (American Society of Anesthesiology, ASA: 1.7 vs. 2.4), and ≥2 systemic diseases with greater frequency (12.5% vs. 44.7%). No significant differences were found between the two groups in terms of postoperative complications, fusion, or revision rate. During follow-up, adjacent disc disease and adjacent fracture occurred significantly more in Group 2 (P<0.05). At the end of follow-up, there were no significant differences between the two groups in any of the clinical and health-related quality of life scores or satisfaction with treatment received. CONCLUSIONS: Osteoporosis represents a major consideration before performing spine surgery. Despite an obvious increased risk of complications in elderly patients, PMMA-augmented fenestrated pedicle screw instrumentation in spine fusion represents a safe and effective surgical treatment option to elderly patients with poor bone quality. Age itself should not be considered a contraindication in otherwise appropriately selected patients.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10570654
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher AME Publishing Company
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-105706542023-10-14 Instrumented lumbar fusion in patients over 75 years of age: is it worthwhile?—a comparative study of the improvement in quality of life between elderly and young patients Tomé-Bermejo, Félix Moreno-Mateo, Fernando Piñera-Parrilla, Ángel Cervera-Irimia, Javier Mengis-Palleck, Charles Louis Gallego-Bustos, Jesús Garzón-Márquez, Francisco Rodríguez-Arguisjuela, María G. Sanz-Aguilera, Sylvia de la Rosa-Zabala, Kelman Luis Avilés-Morente, Carmen Oliveros-Escudero, Beatriz Núñez-Torrealba, Alexa Anaís Alvarez-Galovich, Luis J Spine Surg Original Article BACKGROUND: Surgical treatment of degenerative lumbar disease in the elderly is controversial. Elderly patients have an increased risk for medical and surgical complications commensurate with their comorbidities, and concerns over complications have led to frequent cases of insufficient decompression to avoid the need for instrumentation. The purpose of this study was to evaluate clinical outcome between older and younger patients undergoing lumbar instrumented arthrodesis. METHODS: This is a retrospective, comparative study of prospectively collected outcomes. One hundred and fifty-four patients underwent 1- or 2-level posterolateral lumbar fusion. Patients were divided into two groups. Group 1: 87 patients ≤65 years of age who underwent decompression and posterolateral instrumented fusion; Group 2: 67 patients ≥75 years of age who underwent the same procedures with polymethylmethacrylate (PMMA) pedicle-screw augmentation. Mean follow-up 27.47 months (range, 76–24 months). RESULTS: Mean age was 49.1 years old (range, 24–65) for the younger group and 77.8 (range, 75–86) in the elderly group. Patients ≥75 years of age showed higher preoperative comorbidity (American Society of Anesthesiology, ASA: 1.7 vs. 2.4), and ≥2 systemic diseases with greater frequency (12.5% vs. 44.7%). No significant differences were found between the two groups in terms of postoperative complications, fusion, or revision rate. During follow-up, adjacent disc disease and adjacent fracture occurred significantly more in Group 2 (P<0.05). At the end of follow-up, there were no significant differences between the two groups in any of the clinical and health-related quality of life scores or satisfaction with treatment received. CONCLUSIONS: Osteoporosis represents a major consideration before performing spine surgery. Despite an obvious increased risk of complications in elderly patients, PMMA-augmented fenestrated pedicle screw instrumentation in spine fusion represents a safe and effective surgical treatment option to elderly patients with poor bone quality. Age itself should not be considered a contraindication in otherwise appropriately selected patients. AME Publishing Company 2023-09-22 2023-09-22 /pmc/articles/PMC10570654/ /pubmed/37841795 http://dx.doi.org/10.21037/jss-22-115 Text en 2023 Journal of Spine Surgery. All rights reserved. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/Open Access Statement: This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0), which permits the non-commercial replication and distribution of the article with the strict proviso that no changes or edits are made and the original work is properly cited (including links to both the formal publication through the relevant DOI and the license). See: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0 (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Original Article
Tomé-Bermejo, Félix
Moreno-Mateo, Fernando
Piñera-Parrilla, Ángel
Cervera-Irimia, Javier
Mengis-Palleck, Charles Louis
Gallego-Bustos, Jesús
Garzón-Márquez, Francisco
Rodríguez-Arguisjuela, María G.
Sanz-Aguilera, Sylvia
de la Rosa-Zabala, Kelman Luis
Avilés-Morente, Carmen
Oliveros-Escudero, Beatriz
Núñez-Torrealba, Alexa Anaís
Alvarez-Galovich, Luis
Instrumented lumbar fusion in patients over 75 years of age: is it worthwhile?—a comparative study of the improvement in quality of life between elderly and young patients
title Instrumented lumbar fusion in patients over 75 years of age: is it worthwhile?—a comparative study of the improvement in quality of life between elderly and young patients
title_full Instrumented lumbar fusion in patients over 75 years of age: is it worthwhile?—a comparative study of the improvement in quality of life between elderly and young patients
title_fullStr Instrumented lumbar fusion in patients over 75 years of age: is it worthwhile?—a comparative study of the improvement in quality of life between elderly and young patients
title_full_unstemmed Instrumented lumbar fusion in patients over 75 years of age: is it worthwhile?—a comparative study of the improvement in quality of life between elderly and young patients
title_short Instrumented lumbar fusion in patients over 75 years of age: is it worthwhile?—a comparative study of the improvement in quality of life between elderly and young patients
title_sort instrumented lumbar fusion in patients over 75 years of age: is it worthwhile?—a comparative study of the improvement in quality of life between elderly and young patients
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10570654/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37841795
http://dx.doi.org/10.21037/jss-22-115
work_keys_str_mv AT tomebermejofelix instrumentedlumbarfusioninpatientsover75yearsofageisitworthwhileacomparativestudyoftheimprovementinqualityoflifebetweenelderlyandyoungpatients
AT morenomateofernando instrumentedlumbarfusioninpatientsover75yearsofageisitworthwhileacomparativestudyoftheimprovementinqualityoflifebetweenelderlyandyoungpatients
AT pineraparrillaangel instrumentedlumbarfusioninpatientsover75yearsofageisitworthwhileacomparativestudyoftheimprovementinqualityoflifebetweenelderlyandyoungpatients
AT cerverairimiajavier instrumentedlumbarfusioninpatientsover75yearsofageisitworthwhileacomparativestudyoftheimprovementinqualityoflifebetweenelderlyandyoungpatients
AT mengispalleckcharleslouis instrumentedlumbarfusioninpatientsover75yearsofageisitworthwhileacomparativestudyoftheimprovementinqualityoflifebetweenelderlyandyoungpatients
AT gallegobustosjesus instrumentedlumbarfusioninpatientsover75yearsofageisitworthwhileacomparativestudyoftheimprovementinqualityoflifebetweenelderlyandyoungpatients
AT garzonmarquezfrancisco instrumentedlumbarfusioninpatientsover75yearsofageisitworthwhileacomparativestudyoftheimprovementinqualityoflifebetweenelderlyandyoungpatients
AT rodriguezarguisjuelamariag instrumentedlumbarfusioninpatientsover75yearsofageisitworthwhileacomparativestudyoftheimprovementinqualityoflifebetweenelderlyandyoungpatients
AT sanzaguilerasylvia instrumentedlumbarfusioninpatientsover75yearsofageisitworthwhileacomparativestudyoftheimprovementinqualityoflifebetweenelderlyandyoungpatients
AT delarosazabalakelmanluis instrumentedlumbarfusioninpatientsover75yearsofageisitworthwhileacomparativestudyoftheimprovementinqualityoflifebetweenelderlyandyoungpatients
AT avilesmorentecarmen instrumentedlumbarfusioninpatientsover75yearsofageisitworthwhileacomparativestudyoftheimprovementinqualityoflifebetweenelderlyandyoungpatients
AT oliverosescuderobeatriz instrumentedlumbarfusioninpatientsover75yearsofageisitworthwhileacomparativestudyoftheimprovementinqualityoflifebetweenelderlyandyoungpatients
AT nuneztorrealbaalexaanais instrumentedlumbarfusioninpatientsover75yearsofageisitworthwhileacomparativestudyoftheimprovementinqualityoflifebetweenelderlyandyoungpatients
AT alvarezgalovichluis instrumentedlumbarfusioninpatientsover75yearsofageisitworthwhileacomparativestudyoftheimprovementinqualityoflifebetweenelderlyandyoungpatients