Cargando…
A thematic content analysis of 2010–2015 state tobacco control legislation in the United States: Bill rationales and priority populations
OBJECTIVE: Tobacco use causes numerous types of cancers, heart diseases, and chronic illnesses, and is responsible for nearly 1 in every 5 deaths in the United States (U.S.) annually. This study assessed whether tobacco control laws introduced in state legislatures between 2010 and 2015 provided a r...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10570700/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37840595 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.pmedr.2023.102446 |
_version_ | 1785119827438862336 |
---|---|
author | Kong, Amanda Y. Qingzi Tao, Vivian Golden, Shelley D. |
author_facet | Kong, Amanda Y. Qingzi Tao, Vivian Golden, Shelley D. |
author_sort | Kong, Amanda Y. |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVE: Tobacco use causes numerous types of cancers, heart diseases, and chronic illnesses, and is responsible for nearly 1 in every 5 deaths in the United States (U.S.) annually. This study assessed whether tobacco control laws introduced in state legislatures between 2010 and 2015 provided a rationale for the proposed bill and/or specified priority population groups, and we then examined emerging themes in the text that did so. METHODS: Using LexisNexis® State Net®, we identified tobacco control bills introduced in all states and coded their bill rationales and population category. We then conducted qualitative thematic analysis on a sample of bills with rationales or specified populations. RESULTS: Of the 2815 tobacco control bills introduced in state legislatures in the analysis period, 422 (15.0%) included a bill rationale, and 1309 (46.5%) specified at least one priority population. Four overarching themes emerged: 1) Addressing tobacco-related health harms and financial costs incurred to society; 2) Protecting the public from tobacco-related harms as a government responsibility; 3) Providing services to priority populations; 4) Exempting or preempting some population groups and localities. CONCLUSIONS: Rationalizing tobacco control legislation by focusing on both health and cost implications was a key feature of tobacco policy bill text we analyzed; given the history of this approach, it is likely to remain so in the future. Our study may serve as a benchmark for tracking current and future tobacco control legislation to examine whether there is a growth in prioritizing populations experiencing unjust burdens of tobacco use and related disease. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10570700 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-105707002023-10-14 A thematic content analysis of 2010–2015 state tobacco control legislation in the United States: Bill rationales and priority populations Kong, Amanda Y. Qingzi Tao, Vivian Golden, Shelley D. Prev Med Rep Regular Article OBJECTIVE: Tobacco use causes numerous types of cancers, heart diseases, and chronic illnesses, and is responsible for nearly 1 in every 5 deaths in the United States (U.S.) annually. This study assessed whether tobacco control laws introduced in state legislatures between 2010 and 2015 provided a rationale for the proposed bill and/or specified priority population groups, and we then examined emerging themes in the text that did so. METHODS: Using LexisNexis® State Net®, we identified tobacco control bills introduced in all states and coded their bill rationales and population category. We then conducted qualitative thematic analysis on a sample of bills with rationales or specified populations. RESULTS: Of the 2815 tobacco control bills introduced in state legislatures in the analysis period, 422 (15.0%) included a bill rationale, and 1309 (46.5%) specified at least one priority population. Four overarching themes emerged: 1) Addressing tobacco-related health harms and financial costs incurred to society; 2) Protecting the public from tobacco-related harms as a government responsibility; 3) Providing services to priority populations; 4) Exempting or preempting some population groups and localities. CONCLUSIONS: Rationalizing tobacco control legislation by focusing on both health and cost implications was a key feature of tobacco policy bill text we analyzed; given the history of this approach, it is likely to remain so in the future. Our study may serve as a benchmark for tracking current and future tobacco control legislation to examine whether there is a growth in prioritizing populations experiencing unjust burdens of tobacco use and related disease. 2023-09-27 /pmc/articles/PMC10570700/ /pubmed/37840595 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.pmedr.2023.102446 Text en © 2023 The Authors https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Regular Article Kong, Amanda Y. Qingzi Tao, Vivian Golden, Shelley D. A thematic content analysis of 2010–2015 state tobacco control legislation in the United States: Bill rationales and priority populations |
title | A thematic content analysis of 2010–2015 state tobacco control legislation in the United States: Bill rationales and priority populations |
title_full | A thematic content analysis of 2010–2015 state tobacco control legislation in the United States: Bill rationales and priority populations |
title_fullStr | A thematic content analysis of 2010–2015 state tobacco control legislation in the United States: Bill rationales and priority populations |
title_full_unstemmed | A thematic content analysis of 2010–2015 state tobacco control legislation in the United States: Bill rationales and priority populations |
title_short | A thematic content analysis of 2010–2015 state tobacco control legislation in the United States: Bill rationales and priority populations |
title_sort | thematic content analysis of 2010–2015 state tobacco control legislation in the united states: bill rationales and priority populations |
topic | Regular Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10570700/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37840595 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.pmedr.2023.102446 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT kongamanday athematiccontentanalysisof20102015statetobaccocontrollegislationintheunitedstatesbillrationalesandprioritypopulations AT qingzitaovivian athematiccontentanalysisof20102015statetobaccocontrollegislationintheunitedstatesbillrationalesandprioritypopulations AT goldenshelleyd athematiccontentanalysisof20102015statetobaccocontrollegislationintheunitedstatesbillrationalesandprioritypopulations AT kongamanday thematiccontentanalysisof20102015statetobaccocontrollegislationintheunitedstatesbillrationalesandprioritypopulations AT qingzitaovivian thematiccontentanalysisof20102015statetobaccocontrollegislationintheunitedstatesbillrationalesandprioritypopulations AT goldenshelleyd thematiccontentanalysisof20102015statetobaccocontrollegislationintheunitedstatesbillrationalesandprioritypopulations |