Cargando…

Comparative analysis between ultrasonic shears versus advanced bipolar device in transoral endoscopic thyroidectomy: a randomized controlled trial

BACKGROUND: The transoral endoscopic thyroidectomy vestibular approach (TOETVA) is the most recently developed minimally invasive technique with no skin incision. For tissue dissection and bleeding control, the use of proper energy devices is very important in endoscopic thyroid surgery. To date, th...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Park, Shin-Young, Shin, Myung Ho, Hwang, Young Mi, Choi, Yun Suk, Yi, Jin Wook
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: AME Publishing Company 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10570978/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37842523
http://dx.doi.org/10.21037/gs-23-227
_version_ 1785119883552358400
author Park, Shin-Young
Shin, Myung Ho
Hwang, Young Mi
Choi, Yun Suk
Yi, Jin Wook
author_facet Park, Shin-Young
Shin, Myung Ho
Hwang, Young Mi
Choi, Yun Suk
Yi, Jin Wook
author_sort Park, Shin-Young
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The transoral endoscopic thyroidectomy vestibular approach (TOETVA) is the most recently developed minimally invasive technique with no skin incision. For tissue dissection and bleeding control, the use of proper energy devices is very important in endoscopic thyroid surgery. To date, there have been no clinical studies reported regarding which energy device is better in TOETVA, ultrasonic shears or advanced bipolar device. The aim of our study is to determine which energy device is more useful for TOETVA. METHODS: This study was designed as an open-label, prospective randomized controlled trial in a single university hospital. Patients were randomly assigned to the ultrasonic group or advanced bipolar group before the surgery. From June 2020 to May 2022, 40 patients were enrolled (20 patients were assigned to the ultrasonic group, and 20 patients were assigned to the advanced bipolar group). Primary endpoints were operation time for lobectomy, number of camera cleanings, and blood loss during the lobectomy. Secondary endpoints were pain score, postoperative drainage, and blood chemistry. A single endocrine surgeon had performed all surgeries. RESULTS: There were no significant differences between the two groups in age, sex, body mass index (BMI), tumor location, preoperative cytology, or surgical extent. The time for lobectomy was significantly shorter in the advanced bipolar group (33.8±6.4 vs. 41.9±9.0 minutes, P=0.002). The number of camera cleanings was significantly lower in the advanced bipolar group (2.9±1.6 vs. 5.8±2.5 times, P<0.001). Estimated blood loss was also significantly less in the advanced bipolar group (11.5±17.3 vs. 81.8±99.5 mL, P=0.004). Postoperative hospital stays, drainage, pain score, laboratory findings, and complications were not significantly different between the two groups. CONCLUSIONS: According to this study, advanced bipolar device showed better performance, with a shorter operation time, less camera cleaning, and less blood loss. We suggest that advanced bipolar device can be a better choice in TOETVA. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT04320901.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10570978
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher AME Publishing Company
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-105709782023-10-14 Comparative analysis between ultrasonic shears versus advanced bipolar device in transoral endoscopic thyroidectomy: a randomized controlled trial Park, Shin-Young Shin, Myung Ho Hwang, Young Mi Choi, Yun Suk Yi, Jin Wook Gland Surg Original Article BACKGROUND: The transoral endoscopic thyroidectomy vestibular approach (TOETVA) is the most recently developed minimally invasive technique with no skin incision. For tissue dissection and bleeding control, the use of proper energy devices is very important in endoscopic thyroid surgery. To date, there have been no clinical studies reported regarding which energy device is better in TOETVA, ultrasonic shears or advanced bipolar device. The aim of our study is to determine which energy device is more useful for TOETVA. METHODS: This study was designed as an open-label, prospective randomized controlled trial in a single university hospital. Patients were randomly assigned to the ultrasonic group or advanced bipolar group before the surgery. From June 2020 to May 2022, 40 patients were enrolled (20 patients were assigned to the ultrasonic group, and 20 patients were assigned to the advanced bipolar group). Primary endpoints were operation time for lobectomy, number of camera cleanings, and blood loss during the lobectomy. Secondary endpoints were pain score, postoperative drainage, and blood chemistry. A single endocrine surgeon had performed all surgeries. RESULTS: There were no significant differences between the two groups in age, sex, body mass index (BMI), tumor location, preoperative cytology, or surgical extent. The time for lobectomy was significantly shorter in the advanced bipolar group (33.8±6.4 vs. 41.9±9.0 minutes, P=0.002). The number of camera cleanings was significantly lower in the advanced bipolar group (2.9±1.6 vs. 5.8±2.5 times, P<0.001). Estimated blood loss was also significantly less in the advanced bipolar group (11.5±17.3 vs. 81.8±99.5 mL, P=0.004). Postoperative hospital stays, drainage, pain score, laboratory findings, and complications were not significantly different between the two groups. CONCLUSIONS: According to this study, advanced bipolar device showed better performance, with a shorter operation time, less camera cleaning, and less blood loss. We suggest that advanced bipolar device can be a better choice in TOETVA. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT04320901. AME Publishing Company 2023-09-18 2023-09-25 /pmc/articles/PMC10570978/ /pubmed/37842523 http://dx.doi.org/10.21037/gs-23-227 Text en 2023 Gland Surgery. All rights reserved. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/Open Access Statement: This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0), which permits the non-commercial replication and distribution of the article with the strict proviso that no changes or edits are made and the original work is properly cited (including links to both the formal publication through the relevant DOI and the license). See: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0 (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Original Article
Park, Shin-Young
Shin, Myung Ho
Hwang, Young Mi
Choi, Yun Suk
Yi, Jin Wook
Comparative analysis between ultrasonic shears versus advanced bipolar device in transoral endoscopic thyroidectomy: a randomized controlled trial
title Comparative analysis between ultrasonic shears versus advanced bipolar device in transoral endoscopic thyroidectomy: a randomized controlled trial
title_full Comparative analysis between ultrasonic shears versus advanced bipolar device in transoral endoscopic thyroidectomy: a randomized controlled trial
title_fullStr Comparative analysis between ultrasonic shears versus advanced bipolar device in transoral endoscopic thyroidectomy: a randomized controlled trial
title_full_unstemmed Comparative analysis between ultrasonic shears versus advanced bipolar device in transoral endoscopic thyroidectomy: a randomized controlled trial
title_short Comparative analysis between ultrasonic shears versus advanced bipolar device in transoral endoscopic thyroidectomy: a randomized controlled trial
title_sort comparative analysis between ultrasonic shears versus advanced bipolar device in transoral endoscopic thyroidectomy: a randomized controlled trial
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10570978/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37842523
http://dx.doi.org/10.21037/gs-23-227
work_keys_str_mv AT parkshinyoung comparativeanalysisbetweenultrasonicshearsversusadvancedbipolardeviceintransoralendoscopicthyroidectomyarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT shinmyungho comparativeanalysisbetweenultrasonicshearsversusadvancedbipolardeviceintransoralendoscopicthyroidectomyarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT hwangyoungmi comparativeanalysisbetweenultrasonicshearsversusadvancedbipolardeviceintransoralendoscopicthyroidectomyarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT choiyunsuk comparativeanalysisbetweenultrasonicshearsversusadvancedbipolardeviceintransoralendoscopicthyroidectomyarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT yijinwook comparativeanalysisbetweenultrasonicshearsversusadvancedbipolardeviceintransoralendoscopicthyroidectomyarandomizedcontrolledtrial