Cargando…

Risk factors associated with monozygotic twinning in offspring conceived by assisted reproductive technology

STUDY QUESTION: What are the factors influencing the occurrence of monozygotic (MZ) twins in offspring conceived by assisted reproductive technology (ART)? SUMMARY ANSWER: Parental ages, the transfer of fresh versus frozen embryos, and the grade of blastocysts are all related to MZ twinning in ART o...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Chen, Na, Li, Jingyu, Li, Yexing, Zhang, Yiyuan, Li, Jiarong, Gao, Jie, Hu, Jingmei, Cui, Linlin, Chen, Zi-Jiang
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10570986/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37840637
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/hropen/hoad035
_version_ 1785119885200719872
author Chen, Na
Li, Jingyu
Li, Yexing
Zhang, Yiyuan
Li, Jiarong
Gao, Jie
Hu, Jingmei
Cui, Linlin
Chen, Zi-Jiang
author_facet Chen, Na
Li, Jingyu
Li, Yexing
Zhang, Yiyuan
Li, Jiarong
Gao, Jie
Hu, Jingmei
Cui, Linlin
Chen, Zi-Jiang
author_sort Chen, Na
collection PubMed
description STUDY QUESTION: What are the factors influencing the occurrence of monozygotic (MZ) twins in offspring conceived by assisted reproductive technology (ART)? SUMMARY ANSWER: Parental ages, the transfer of fresh versus frozen embryos, and the grade of blastocysts are all related to MZ twinning in ART offspring. WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY: Offspring conceived by ART have significantly increased risk of MZ twins, which may be due to the characteristics of the infertile population. The objective of this study was to explore the incidence of monozygotic (MZ) twins after ART and to clarify the risk factors for MZ twinning. STUDY DESIGN, SIZE, DURATION: A total of 255 monozygotic twins were enrolled in this cohort study, and then matched with singletons at a ratio of 1:4 randomly (with 1020 in the control group). All offspring were conceived by single embryo transfer. PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS, SETTING, METHODS: The collected data were divided into the following three aspects for analysis: characteristics of the infertile population, gamete or embryo manipulations, and factors related to embryo development. MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE: The incidence of MZ twins was 1.638% (255 out of 15 567 pregnancies after single embryo transfers). Compared to singleton births, a significantly lower rate of frozen embryo transfers (FET; 78.0% vs 86.1% P = 0.002) was seen amongst the MZ twins. Amongst fresh ETs, the rate of blastocyst transfers in the MZ twins group was higher compared to that in the control group (92.9% vs 75.4%, P = 0.005). We also found that certain grades of blastocysts in terms of trophectoderm (TE) development, inner cell mass + TE development and the classification of ‘top-quality’ embryos were associated with the incidence of MZ twinning (P = 0.025, P = 0.012, P = 0.020, respectively). Logistic regression analysis revealed that higher paternal age (odds ratio (OR) = 0.94, 95% CI = 0.89–1.00, P = 0.029) and FET (OR = 0.48, 95% CI = 0.33–0.68, P = 0.001) may be protective factors against MZ twinning. However, higher maternal age (OR = 1.07, 95% CI = 1.01–1.13, P = 0.027) and the transfer of blastocysts (OR = 4.31, 95% CI = 1.46–12.73, P = 0.008) appeared to be associated with an increased risk of MZ twinning. Amongst blastocyst transfers, a C grade TE may be protective factor against MZ twinning (B: OR = 1.90, 95% CI = 1.18–3.07, P = 0.009; A: OR = 1.58, 95% CI = 0.93–2.67, P = 0.089). LIMITATIONS, REASONS FOR CAUTION: First, our definition of MZ twins was based on twins’ birth after single embryo transfers (SET), rather than ultrasound examination during early pregnancy. Second, the parental characteristics of the two groups were homogenous, so it was difficult to find any associations between infertility factors and the incidence of MZ twins. WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE FINDINGS: This multifaceted analysis of the risk factors for MZ twinning provides some information for clinical interventions in high-risk populations. STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTEREST(S): This study was supported by the National Key Technology Research and Developmental Program of China (2022YFC2704404), CAMS Innovation Fund for Medical Sciences (2021-I2M-5-001), Taishan Scholars Program for Young Experts of Shandong Province (tsqn201909195), the Basic Science Center Program (31988101), and the Shandong Provincial Key Research and Development Program (2020ZLYS02). All authors have no conflicts of interest to declare. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: N/A.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10570986
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-105709862023-10-14 Risk factors associated with monozygotic twinning in offspring conceived by assisted reproductive technology Chen, Na Li, Jingyu Li, Yexing Zhang, Yiyuan Li, Jiarong Gao, Jie Hu, Jingmei Cui, Linlin Chen, Zi-Jiang Hum Reprod Open Original Article STUDY QUESTION: What are the factors influencing the occurrence of monozygotic (MZ) twins in offspring conceived by assisted reproductive technology (ART)? SUMMARY ANSWER: Parental ages, the transfer of fresh versus frozen embryos, and the grade of blastocysts are all related to MZ twinning in ART offspring. WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY: Offspring conceived by ART have significantly increased risk of MZ twins, which may be due to the characteristics of the infertile population. The objective of this study was to explore the incidence of monozygotic (MZ) twins after ART and to clarify the risk factors for MZ twinning. STUDY DESIGN, SIZE, DURATION: A total of 255 monozygotic twins were enrolled in this cohort study, and then matched with singletons at a ratio of 1:4 randomly (with 1020 in the control group). All offspring were conceived by single embryo transfer. PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS, SETTING, METHODS: The collected data were divided into the following three aspects for analysis: characteristics of the infertile population, gamete or embryo manipulations, and factors related to embryo development. MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE: The incidence of MZ twins was 1.638% (255 out of 15 567 pregnancies after single embryo transfers). Compared to singleton births, a significantly lower rate of frozen embryo transfers (FET; 78.0% vs 86.1% P = 0.002) was seen amongst the MZ twins. Amongst fresh ETs, the rate of blastocyst transfers in the MZ twins group was higher compared to that in the control group (92.9% vs 75.4%, P = 0.005). We also found that certain grades of blastocysts in terms of trophectoderm (TE) development, inner cell mass + TE development and the classification of ‘top-quality’ embryos were associated with the incidence of MZ twinning (P = 0.025, P = 0.012, P = 0.020, respectively). Logistic regression analysis revealed that higher paternal age (odds ratio (OR) = 0.94, 95% CI = 0.89–1.00, P = 0.029) and FET (OR = 0.48, 95% CI = 0.33–0.68, P = 0.001) may be protective factors against MZ twinning. However, higher maternal age (OR = 1.07, 95% CI = 1.01–1.13, P = 0.027) and the transfer of blastocysts (OR = 4.31, 95% CI = 1.46–12.73, P = 0.008) appeared to be associated with an increased risk of MZ twinning. Amongst blastocyst transfers, a C grade TE may be protective factor against MZ twinning (B: OR = 1.90, 95% CI = 1.18–3.07, P = 0.009; A: OR = 1.58, 95% CI = 0.93–2.67, P = 0.089). LIMITATIONS, REASONS FOR CAUTION: First, our definition of MZ twins was based on twins’ birth after single embryo transfers (SET), rather than ultrasound examination during early pregnancy. Second, the parental characteristics of the two groups were homogenous, so it was difficult to find any associations between infertility factors and the incidence of MZ twins. WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE FINDINGS: This multifaceted analysis of the risk factors for MZ twinning provides some information for clinical interventions in high-risk populations. STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTEREST(S): This study was supported by the National Key Technology Research and Developmental Program of China (2022YFC2704404), CAMS Innovation Fund for Medical Sciences (2021-I2M-5-001), Taishan Scholars Program for Young Experts of Shandong Province (tsqn201909195), the Basic Science Center Program (31988101), and the Shandong Provincial Key Research and Development Program (2020ZLYS02). All authors have no conflicts of interest to declare. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: N/A. Oxford University Press 2023-09-14 /pmc/articles/PMC10570986/ /pubmed/37840637 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/hropen/hoad035 Text en © The Author(s) 2023. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted reuse, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Chen, Na
Li, Jingyu
Li, Yexing
Zhang, Yiyuan
Li, Jiarong
Gao, Jie
Hu, Jingmei
Cui, Linlin
Chen, Zi-Jiang
Risk factors associated with monozygotic twinning in offspring conceived by assisted reproductive technology
title Risk factors associated with monozygotic twinning in offspring conceived by assisted reproductive technology
title_full Risk factors associated with monozygotic twinning in offspring conceived by assisted reproductive technology
title_fullStr Risk factors associated with monozygotic twinning in offspring conceived by assisted reproductive technology
title_full_unstemmed Risk factors associated with monozygotic twinning in offspring conceived by assisted reproductive technology
title_short Risk factors associated with monozygotic twinning in offspring conceived by assisted reproductive technology
title_sort risk factors associated with monozygotic twinning in offspring conceived by assisted reproductive technology
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10570986/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37840637
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/hropen/hoad035
work_keys_str_mv AT chenna riskfactorsassociatedwithmonozygotictwinninginoffspringconceivedbyassistedreproductivetechnology
AT lijingyu riskfactorsassociatedwithmonozygotictwinninginoffspringconceivedbyassistedreproductivetechnology
AT liyexing riskfactorsassociatedwithmonozygotictwinninginoffspringconceivedbyassistedreproductivetechnology
AT zhangyiyuan riskfactorsassociatedwithmonozygotictwinninginoffspringconceivedbyassistedreproductivetechnology
AT lijiarong riskfactorsassociatedwithmonozygotictwinninginoffspringconceivedbyassistedreproductivetechnology
AT gaojie riskfactorsassociatedwithmonozygotictwinninginoffspringconceivedbyassistedreproductivetechnology
AT hujingmei riskfactorsassociatedwithmonozygotictwinninginoffspringconceivedbyassistedreproductivetechnology
AT cuilinlin riskfactorsassociatedwithmonozygotictwinninginoffspringconceivedbyassistedreproductivetechnology
AT chenzijiang riskfactorsassociatedwithmonozygotictwinninginoffspringconceivedbyassistedreproductivetechnology