Cargando…

SG-APSIC1066: Costs and surgical-site infection outcomes using ChloraPrep versus aqueous povidone iodine after colorectal surgeries in Australian public hospitals

Objectives: In Australia, the prevalence of SSI is 3.6%, with a particularly high burden in colorectal procedures of 8.7%. ChloraPrep (2% chlorhexidine gluconate (CHG)–70% isopropyl alcohol formulation) is a preoperative sterile alcoholic CHG solution prefilled in a ready-to-use applicator. We compa...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Tan, Kristin Hui Xian, Ma, Yan
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Cambridge University Press 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10571114/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/ash.2023.89
_version_ 1785119912720596992
author Tan, Kristin Hui Xian
Ma, Yan
author_facet Tan, Kristin Hui Xian
Ma, Yan
author_sort Tan, Kristin Hui Xian
collection PubMed
description Objectives: In Australia, the prevalence of SSI is 3.6%, with a particularly high burden in colorectal procedures of 8.7%. ChloraPrep (2% chlorhexidine gluconate (CHG)–70% isopropyl alcohol formulation) is a preoperative sterile alcoholic CHG solution prefilled in a ready-to-use applicator. We compared the costs and SSI outcomes of adopting ChloraPrep versus a bulk aqueous povidone iodine (PVI) solution for colorectal procedures in a public hospital setting. Methods: We used a budget-impact tool to evaluate the clinical and economic impacts of skin preparation methods. The PVI SSI rate was assumed to be the baseline rate observed in Australia (8.7%). The ChloraPrep SSI rate was derived by applying the demonstrated ChloraPrep SSI reduction versus PVI (41%) to the PVI SSI rate. The cost of ChloraPrep was AU$8 (US $5.50) and the cost of PVI solution was AU$3 (US $2). The PVI equipment cost AU$2.13 (US $1.47). Additional average length of stay was 9.4 days, and the daily average cost was AU$2,347 (US $1,618). The average skin preparation time was 3.5 minutes using ChloraPrep and 8.5 minutes using PVI. The hospital-acquired complication (HAC) penalty for SSI was calculated using the national efficient price (AU $5,797 or US $3,996), national weighted activity unit (4.6261), and adjustment rate for patient complexity levels (high, 4.8%; moderate, 5.9%; and low, 7.9%). Results: The model estimated SSI rates were 5.1% using ChloraPrep and 8.7% for PVI. For every 1,000 patients, skin preparation cost was estimated to be AU$8,100 (US $5.583) using ChloraPrep and AU$5,200 (US $3.585) using PVI. SSI treatment cost was estimated to be AU$449,900 (US $310,127) for ChloraPrep and AU$762,500 (US $525,610) for PVI. In addition, 330 bed days could be avoided and at least 80 operating room hours could be saved with 35 SSIs avoided. With 35 SSIs avoided, a potential reduction of AU$26,500 (US $18,267) in HAC penalty could be expected. This intervention could yield an overall cost savings of AU$336,300 (US $231,820). Conclusions: Using ChloraPrep for skin preparation prior to colorectal procedures could result in lower SSI rates and cost savings from treating fewer SSIs. Operational efficiency might also be improved.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10571114
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Cambridge University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-105711142023-10-14 SG-APSIC1066: Costs and surgical-site infection outcomes using ChloraPrep versus aqueous povidone iodine after colorectal surgeries in Australian public hospitals Tan, Kristin Hui Xian Ma, Yan Antimicrob Steward Healthc Epidemiol SSIs Objectives: In Australia, the prevalence of SSI is 3.6%, with a particularly high burden in colorectal procedures of 8.7%. ChloraPrep (2% chlorhexidine gluconate (CHG)–70% isopropyl alcohol formulation) is a preoperative sterile alcoholic CHG solution prefilled in a ready-to-use applicator. We compared the costs and SSI outcomes of adopting ChloraPrep versus a bulk aqueous povidone iodine (PVI) solution for colorectal procedures in a public hospital setting. Methods: We used a budget-impact tool to evaluate the clinical and economic impacts of skin preparation methods. The PVI SSI rate was assumed to be the baseline rate observed in Australia (8.7%). The ChloraPrep SSI rate was derived by applying the demonstrated ChloraPrep SSI reduction versus PVI (41%) to the PVI SSI rate. The cost of ChloraPrep was AU$8 (US $5.50) and the cost of PVI solution was AU$3 (US $2). The PVI equipment cost AU$2.13 (US $1.47). Additional average length of stay was 9.4 days, and the daily average cost was AU$2,347 (US $1,618). The average skin preparation time was 3.5 minutes using ChloraPrep and 8.5 minutes using PVI. The hospital-acquired complication (HAC) penalty for SSI was calculated using the national efficient price (AU $5,797 or US $3,996), national weighted activity unit (4.6261), and adjustment rate for patient complexity levels (high, 4.8%; moderate, 5.9%; and low, 7.9%). Results: The model estimated SSI rates were 5.1% using ChloraPrep and 8.7% for PVI. For every 1,000 patients, skin preparation cost was estimated to be AU$8,100 (US $5.583) using ChloraPrep and AU$5,200 (US $3.585) using PVI. SSI treatment cost was estimated to be AU$449,900 (US $310,127) for ChloraPrep and AU$762,500 (US $525,610) for PVI. In addition, 330 bed days could be avoided and at least 80 operating room hours could be saved with 35 SSIs avoided. With 35 SSIs avoided, a potential reduction of AU$26,500 (US $18,267) in HAC penalty could be expected. This intervention could yield an overall cost savings of AU$336,300 (US $231,820). Conclusions: Using ChloraPrep for skin preparation prior to colorectal procedures could result in lower SSI rates and cost savings from treating fewer SSIs. Operational efficiency might also be improved. Cambridge University Press 2023-03-16 /pmc/articles/PMC10571114/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/ash.2023.89 Text en © The Society for Healthcare Epidemiology of America 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle SSIs
Tan, Kristin Hui Xian
Ma, Yan
SG-APSIC1066: Costs and surgical-site infection outcomes using ChloraPrep versus aqueous povidone iodine after colorectal surgeries in Australian public hospitals
title SG-APSIC1066: Costs and surgical-site infection outcomes using ChloraPrep versus aqueous povidone iodine after colorectal surgeries in Australian public hospitals
title_full SG-APSIC1066: Costs and surgical-site infection outcomes using ChloraPrep versus aqueous povidone iodine after colorectal surgeries in Australian public hospitals
title_fullStr SG-APSIC1066: Costs and surgical-site infection outcomes using ChloraPrep versus aqueous povidone iodine after colorectal surgeries in Australian public hospitals
title_full_unstemmed SG-APSIC1066: Costs and surgical-site infection outcomes using ChloraPrep versus aqueous povidone iodine after colorectal surgeries in Australian public hospitals
title_short SG-APSIC1066: Costs and surgical-site infection outcomes using ChloraPrep versus aqueous povidone iodine after colorectal surgeries in Australian public hospitals
title_sort sg-apsic1066: costs and surgical-site infection outcomes using chloraprep versus aqueous povidone iodine after colorectal surgeries in australian public hospitals
topic SSIs
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10571114/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/ash.2023.89
work_keys_str_mv AT tankristinhuixian sgapsic1066costsandsurgicalsiteinfectionoutcomesusingchloraprepversusaqueouspovidoneiodineaftercolorectalsurgeriesinaustralianpublichospitals
AT mayan sgapsic1066costsandsurgicalsiteinfectionoutcomesusingchloraprepversusaqueouspovidoneiodineaftercolorectalsurgeriesinaustralianpublichospitals