Cargando…
SG-APSIC1056: Finding the right fit: Our experience in quantitative N95 respirator fit-testing
Objectives: Following a cluster of COVID-19 cases in a Singapore public hospital in April 2021, the local health authority mandated the use of N95 respirators in all inpatient wards. This increased the demand for N95 mask fit-testing to ensure that healthcare workers were donning respirators that fi...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Cambridge University Press
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10571171/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/ash.2023.61 |
_version_ | 1785119926666657792 |
---|---|
author | Ong, Jin Min Sheena Ismail, Bushra Binte Shaik Min, Sheena Ong Jin Xin, Gillian Lee Li Chee, Lee Lai Bien, Molly How Kue Lin, Ling Moi |
author_facet | Ong, Jin Min Sheena Ismail, Bushra Binte Shaik Min, Sheena Ong Jin Xin, Gillian Lee Li Chee, Lee Lai Bien, Molly How Kue Lin, Ling Moi |
author_sort | Ong, Jin Min Sheena |
collection | PubMed |
description | Objectives: Following a cluster of COVID-19 cases in a Singapore public hospital in April 2021, the local health authority mandated the use of N95 respirators in all inpatient wards. This increased the demand for N95 mask fit-testing to ensure that healthcare workers were donning respirators that fit their facial characteristics and hence provided protection through a good facial seal. The demand for fit-testing during the pandemic highlighted the scarcity of manpower and ergonomics concern, such as carpel tunnel syndrome experienced in long hours of qualitative fit-testing sessions. We evaluated the operational efficiency, cost-effectiveness, and difference in passing rate after the introduction of the quantitative method. Methods: Conventional qualitative fit-testing was conducted using manual pumping of a challenge agent, enabling the user to determine the fit of the respirator. The quantitative fit-testing protocol used a condensation particle counter (CPC) to measure the concentration of particles inside the mask and the atmosphere to determine the fit of respirator. The Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA)–approved minimum fit factor of 100 was used as the criterion for a successful N95 respirator fit. Tubes used during quantitative fit-testing were reprocessed using thermal disinfection. Results: Quantitative mask fit-testing provided an objective numerical measure to assess adequate fit of N95 respirator, which provided users with confidence in the respirator fit. It addressed a manpower limitation issue because it did not require qualified trainers to conduct the test, and automation also prevented any potential occupational hazard from repeated actions required in qualitative fit-testing. An increase in the passing rate for N95 fit-testing from 94.5% to 95.5% was observed. However, the high cost of equipment, annual recalibration, and consumables must be considered. Conclusions: Quantitative N95 fit-testing, when adopted with careful consideration of its cost, is an approach to consider for hospital-wide fit-testing. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10571171 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | Cambridge University Press |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-105711712023-10-14 SG-APSIC1056: Finding the right fit: Our experience in quantitative N95 respirator fit-testing Ong, Jin Min Sheena Ismail, Bushra Binte Shaik Min, Sheena Ong Jin Xin, Gillian Lee Li Chee, Lee Lai Bien, Molly How Kue Lin, Ling Moi Antimicrob Steward Healthc Epidemiol Improvement Science (Quality Improvement) Objectives: Following a cluster of COVID-19 cases in a Singapore public hospital in April 2021, the local health authority mandated the use of N95 respirators in all inpatient wards. This increased the demand for N95 mask fit-testing to ensure that healthcare workers were donning respirators that fit their facial characteristics and hence provided protection through a good facial seal. The demand for fit-testing during the pandemic highlighted the scarcity of manpower and ergonomics concern, such as carpel tunnel syndrome experienced in long hours of qualitative fit-testing sessions. We evaluated the operational efficiency, cost-effectiveness, and difference in passing rate after the introduction of the quantitative method. Methods: Conventional qualitative fit-testing was conducted using manual pumping of a challenge agent, enabling the user to determine the fit of the respirator. The quantitative fit-testing protocol used a condensation particle counter (CPC) to measure the concentration of particles inside the mask and the atmosphere to determine the fit of respirator. The Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA)–approved minimum fit factor of 100 was used as the criterion for a successful N95 respirator fit. Tubes used during quantitative fit-testing were reprocessed using thermal disinfection. Results: Quantitative mask fit-testing provided an objective numerical measure to assess adequate fit of N95 respirator, which provided users with confidence in the respirator fit. It addressed a manpower limitation issue because it did not require qualified trainers to conduct the test, and automation also prevented any potential occupational hazard from repeated actions required in qualitative fit-testing. An increase in the passing rate for N95 fit-testing from 94.5% to 95.5% was observed. However, the high cost of equipment, annual recalibration, and consumables must be considered. Conclusions: Quantitative N95 fit-testing, when adopted with careful consideration of its cost, is an approach to consider for hospital-wide fit-testing. Cambridge University Press 2023-03-16 /pmc/articles/PMC10571171/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/ash.2023.61 Text en © The Society for Healthcare Epidemiology of America 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Improvement Science (Quality Improvement) Ong, Jin Min Sheena Ismail, Bushra Binte Shaik Min, Sheena Ong Jin Xin, Gillian Lee Li Chee, Lee Lai Bien, Molly How Kue Lin, Ling Moi SG-APSIC1056: Finding the right fit: Our experience in quantitative N95 respirator fit-testing |
title | SG-APSIC1056: Finding the right fit: Our experience in quantitative N95 respirator fit-testing |
title_full | SG-APSIC1056: Finding the right fit: Our experience in quantitative N95 respirator fit-testing |
title_fullStr | SG-APSIC1056: Finding the right fit: Our experience in quantitative N95 respirator fit-testing |
title_full_unstemmed | SG-APSIC1056: Finding the right fit: Our experience in quantitative N95 respirator fit-testing |
title_short | SG-APSIC1056: Finding the right fit: Our experience in quantitative N95 respirator fit-testing |
title_sort | sg-apsic1056: finding the right fit: our experience in quantitative n95 respirator fit-testing |
topic | Improvement Science (Quality Improvement) |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10571171/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/ash.2023.61 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT ongjinminsheena sgapsic1056findingtherightfitourexperienceinquantitativen95respiratorfittesting AT ismailbushrabinteshaik sgapsic1056findingtherightfitourexperienceinquantitativen95respiratorfittesting AT minsheenaongjin sgapsic1056findingtherightfitourexperienceinquantitativen95respiratorfittesting AT xingillianleeli sgapsic1056findingtherightfitourexperienceinquantitativen95respiratorfittesting AT cheeleelai sgapsic1056findingtherightfitourexperienceinquantitativen95respiratorfittesting AT bienmollyhowkue sgapsic1056findingtherightfitourexperienceinquantitativen95respiratorfittesting AT linlingmoi sgapsic1056findingtherightfitourexperienceinquantitativen95respiratorfittesting |