Cargando…

Biomarkers in Alzheimer’s disease: role in early and differential diagnosis and recognition of atypical variants

BACKGROUND: Development of in vivo biomarkers has shifted the diagnosis of Alzheimer’s disease (AD) from the later dementia stages of disease towards the earlier stages and has introduced the potential for pre-symptomatic diagnosis. The International Working Group recommends that AD diagnosis is res...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Dubois, Bruno, von Arnim, Christine A. F., Burnie, Nerida, Bozeat, Sasha, Cummings, Jeffrey
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10571241/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37833762
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13195-023-01314-6
_version_ 1785119944291123200
author Dubois, Bruno
von Arnim, Christine A. F.
Burnie, Nerida
Bozeat, Sasha
Cummings, Jeffrey
author_facet Dubois, Bruno
von Arnim, Christine A. F.
Burnie, Nerida
Bozeat, Sasha
Cummings, Jeffrey
author_sort Dubois, Bruno
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Development of in vivo biomarkers has shifted the diagnosis of Alzheimer’s disease (AD) from the later dementia stages of disease towards the earlier stages and has introduced the potential for pre-symptomatic diagnosis. The International Working Group recommends that AD diagnosis is restricted in the clinical setting to people with specific AD phenotypes and supportive biomarker findings. MAIN BODY: In this review, we discuss the phenotypic presentation and use of biomarkers for the early diagnosis of typical and atypical AD and describe how this can support clinical decision making, benefit patient communication, and improve the patient journey. Early diagnosis is essential to optimize the benefits of available and emerging treatments. As atypical presentations of AD often mimic other dementias, differential diagnosis can be challenging and can be facilitated using AD biomarkers. However, AD biomarkers alone are not sufficient to confidently diagnose AD or predict disease progression and should be supplementary to clinical assessment to help inform the diagnosis of AD. CONCLUSIONS: Use of AD biomarkers with incorporation of atypical AD phenotypes into diagnostic criteria will allow earlier diagnosis of patients with atypical clinical presentations that otherwise would have been misdiagnosed and treated inappropriately. Early diagnosis is essential to guide informed discussion, appropriate care and support, and individualized treatment. It is hoped that disease-modifying treatments will impact the underlying AD pathology; thus, determining the patient’s AD phenotype will be a critical factor in guiding the therapeutic approach and the assessment of the effects of interventions.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10571241
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-105712412023-10-14 Biomarkers in Alzheimer’s disease: role in early and differential diagnosis and recognition of atypical variants Dubois, Bruno von Arnim, Christine A. F. Burnie, Nerida Bozeat, Sasha Cummings, Jeffrey Alzheimers Res Ther Review BACKGROUND: Development of in vivo biomarkers has shifted the diagnosis of Alzheimer’s disease (AD) from the later dementia stages of disease towards the earlier stages and has introduced the potential for pre-symptomatic diagnosis. The International Working Group recommends that AD diagnosis is restricted in the clinical setting to people with specific AD phenotypes and supportive biomarker findings. MAIN BODY: In this review, we discuss the phenotypic presentation and use of biomarkers for the early diagnosis of typical and atypical AD and describe how this can support clinical decision making, benefit patient communication, and improve the patient journey. Early diagnosis is essential to optimize the benefits of available and emerging treatments. As atypical presentations of AD often mimic other dementias, differential diagnosis can be challenging and can be facilitated using AD biomarkers. However, AD biomarkers alone are not sufficient to confidently diagnose AD or predict disease progression and should be supplementary to clinical assessment to help inform the diagnosis of AD. CONCLUSIONS: Use of AD biomarkers with incorporation of atypical AD phenotypes into diagnostic criteria will allow earlier diagnosis of patients with atypical clinical presentations that otherwise would have been misdiagnosed and treated inappropriately. Early diagnosis is essential to guide informed discussion, appropriate care and support, and individualized treatment. It is hoped that disease-modifying treatments will impact the underlying AD pathology; thus, determining the patient’s AD phenotype will be a critical factor in guiding the therapeutic approach and the assessment of the effects of interventions. BioMed Central 2023-10-13 /pmc/articles/PMC10571241/ /pubmed/37833762 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13195-023-01314-6 Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Review
Dubois, Bruno
von Arnim, Christine A. F.
Burnie, Nerida
Bozeat, Sasha
Cummings, Jeffrey
Biomarkers in Alzheimer’s disease: role in early and differential diagnosis and recognition of atypical variants
title Biomarkers in Alzheimer’s disease: role in early and differential diagnosis and recognition of atypical variants
title_full Biomarkers in Alzheimer’s disease: role in early and differential diagnosis and recognition of atypical variants
title_fullStr Biomarkers in Alzheimer’s disease: role in early and differential diagnosis and recognition of atypical variants
title_full_unstemmed Biomarkers in Alzheimer’s disease: role in early and differential diagnosis and recognition of atypical variants
title_short Biomarkers in Alzheimer’s disease: role in early and differential diagnosis and recognition of atypical variants
title_sort biomarkers in alzheimer’s disease: role in early and differential diagnosis and recognition of atypical variants
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10571241/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37833762
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13195-023-01314-6
work_keys_str_mv AT duboisbruno biomarkersinalzheimersdiseaseroleinearlyanddifferentialdiagnosisandrecognitionofatypicalvariants
AT vonarnimchristineaf biomarkersinalzheimersdiseaseroleinearlyanddifferentialdiagnosisandrecognitionofatypicalvariants
AT burnienerida biomarkersinalzheimersdiseaseroleinearlyanddifferentialdiagnosisandrecognitionofatypicalvariants
AT bozeatsasha biomarkersinalzheimersdiseaseroleinearlyanddifferentialdiagnosisandrecognitionofatypicalvariants
AT cummingsjeffrey biomarkersinalzheimersdiseaseroleinearlyanddifferentialdiagnosisandrecognitionofatypicalvariants