Cargando…
Minimally invasive versus open pancreatoduodenectomy for pancreatic and peri-ampullary neoplasm (DIPLOMA-2): study protocol for an international multicenter patient-blinded randomized controlled trial
BACKGROUND: Minimally invasive pancreatoduodenectomy (MIPD) aims to reduce the negative impact of surgery as compared to open pancreatoduodenectomy (OPD) and is increasingly becoming part of clinical practice for selected patients worldwide. However, the safety of MIPD remains a topic of debate and...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10571285/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37828593 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13063-023-07657-7 |
_version_ | 1785119955036930048 |
---|---|
author | de Graaf, Nine Emmen, Anouk M. L. H. Ramera, Marco Björnsson, Bergthor Boggi, Ugo Bruna, Caro L. Busch, Olivier R. Daams, Freek Ferrari, Giovanni Festen, Sebastiaan van Hilst, Jony D’Hondt, Mathieu Ielpo, Benedetto Keck, Tobias Khatkov, Igor E. Koerkamp, Bas Groot Lips, Daan J. Luyer, Misha D. P. Mieog, J. Sven D. Morelli, Luca Molenaar, I. Quintus van Santvoort, Hjalmar C. Sprangers, Mirjam A. G. Ferrari, Clarissa Berkhof, Johannes Maisonneuve, Patrick Abu Hilal, Mohammad Besselink, Marc G. |
author_facet | de Graaf, Nine Emmen, Anouk M. L. H. Ramera, Marco Björnsson, Bergthor Boggi, Ugo Bruna, Caro L. Busch, Olivier R. Daams, Freek Ferrari, Giovanni Festen, Sebastiaan van Hilst, Jony D’Hondt, Mathieu Ielpo, Benedetto Keck, Tobias Khatkov, Igor E. Koerkamp, Bas Groot Lips, Daan J. Luyer, Misha D. P. Mieog, J. Sven D. Morelli, Luca Molenaar, I. Quintus van Santvoort, Hjalmar C. Sprangers, Mirjam A. G. Ferrari, Clarissa Berkhof, Johannes Maisonneuve, Patrick Abu Hilal, Mohammad Besselink, Marc G. |
author_sort | de Graaf, Nine |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Minimally invasive pancreatoduodenectomy (MIPD) aims to reduce the negative impact of surgery as compared to open pancreatoduodenectomy (OPD) and is increasingly becoming part of clinical practice for selected patients worldwide. However, the safety of MIPD remains a topic of debate and the potential shorter time to functional recovery needs to be confirmed. To guide safe implementation of MIPD, large-scale international randomized trials comparing MIPD and OPD in experienced high-volume centers are needed. We hypothesize that MIPD is non-inferior in terms of overall complications, but superior regarding time to functional recovery, as compared to OPD. METHODS/DESIGN: The DIPLOMA-2 trial is an international randomized controlled, patient-blinded, non-inferiority trial performed in 14 high-volume pancreatic centers in Europe with a minimum annual volume of 30 MIPD and 30 OPD. A total of 288 patients with an indication for elective pancreatoduodenectomy for pre-malignant and malignant disease, eligible for both open and minimally invasive approach, are randomly allocated for MIPD or OPD in a 2:1 ratio. Centers perform either laparoscopic or robot-assisted MIPD based on their surgical expertise. The primary outcome is the Comprehensive Complication Index (CCI®), measuring all complications graded according to the Clavien-Dindo classification up to 90 days after surgery. The sample size is calculated with the following assumptions: 2.5% one-sided significance level (α), 80% power (1-β), expected difference of the mean CCI® score of 0 points between MIPD and OPD, and a non-inferiority margin of 7.5 points. The main secondary outcome is time to functional recovery, which will be analyzed for superiority. Other secondary outcomes include post-operative 90-day Fitbit™ measured activity, operative outcomes (e.g., blood loss, operative time, conversion to open surgery, surgeon-reported outcomes), oncological findings in case of malignancy (e.g., R0-resection rate, time to adjuvant treatment, survival), postoperative outcomes (e.g., clinically relevant complications), healthcare resource utilization (length of stay, readmissions, intensive care stay), quality of life, and costs. Postoperative follow-up is up to 36 months. DISCUSSION: The DIPLOMA-2 trial aims to establish the safety of MIPD as the new standard of care for this selected patient population undergoing pancreatoduodenectomy in high-volume centers, ultimately aiming for superior patient recovery. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ISRCTN27483786. Registered on August 2, 2023 |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10571285 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-105712852023-10-14 Minimally invasive versus open pancreatoduodenectomy for pancreatic and peri-ampullary neoplasm (DIPLOMA-2): study protocol for an international multicenter patient-blinded randomized controlled trial de Graaf, Nine Emmen, Anouk M. L. H. Ramera, Marco Björnsson, Bergthor Boggi, Ugo Bruna, Caro L. Busch, Olivier R. Daams, Freek Ferrari, Giovanni Festen, Sebastiaan van Hilst, Jony D’Hondt, Mathieu Ielpo, Benedetto Keck, Tobias Khatkov, Igor E. Koerkamp, Bas Groot Lips, Daan J. Luyer, Misha D. P. Mieog, J. Sven D. Morelli, Luca Molenaar, I. Quintus van Santvoort, Hjalmar C. Sprangers, Mirjam A. G. Ferrari, Clarissa Berkhof, Johannes Maisonneuve, Patrick Abu Hilal, Mohammad Besselink, Marc G. Trials Study Protocol BACKGROUND: Minimally invasive pancreatoduodenectomy (MIPD) aims to reduce the negative impact of surgery as compared to open pancreatoduodenectomy (OPD) and is increasingly becoming part of clinical practice for selected patients worldwide. However, the safety of MIPD remains a topic of debate and the potential shorter time to functional recovery needs to be confirmed. To guide safe implementation of MIPD, large-scale international randomized trials comparing MIPD and OPD in experienced high-volume centers are needed. We hypothesize that MIPD is non-inferior in terms of overall complications, but superior regarding time to functional recovery, as compared to OPD. METHODS/DESIGN: The DIPLOMA-2 trial is an international randomized controlled, patient-blinded, non-inferiority trial performed in 14 high-volume pancreatic centers in Europe with a minimum annual volume of 30 MIPD and 30 OPD. A total of 288 patients with an indication for elective pancreatoduodenectomy for pre-malignant and malignant disease, eligible for both open and minimally invasive approach, are randomly allocated for MIPD or OPD in a 2:1 ratio. Centers perform either laparoscopic or robot-assisted MIPD based on their surgical expertise. The primary outcome is the Comprehensive Complication Index (CCI®), measuring all complications graded according to the Clavien-Dindo classification up to 90 days after surgery. The sample size is calculated with the following assumptions: 2.5% one-sided significance level (α), 80% power (1-β), expected difference of the mean CCI® score of 0 points between MIPD and OPD, and a non-inferiority margin of 7.5 points. The main secondary outcome is time to functional recovery, which will be analyzed for superiority. Other secondary outcomes include post-operative 90-day Fitbit™ measured activity, operative outcomes (e.g., blood loss, operative time, conversion to open surgery, surgeon-reported outcomes), oncological findings in case of malignancy (e.g., R0-resection rate, time to adjuvant treatment, survival), postoperative outcomes (e.g., clinically relevant complications), healthcare resource utilization (length of stay, readmissions, intensive care stay), quality of life, and costs. Postoperative follow-up is up to 36 months. DISCUSSION: The DIPLOMA-2 trial aims to establish the safety of MIPD as the new standard of care for this selected patient population undergoing pancreatoduodenectomy in high-volume centers, ultimately aiming for superior patient recovery. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ISRCTN27483786. Registered on August 2, 2023 BioMed Central 2023-10-12 /pmc/articles/PMC10571285/ /pubmed/37828593 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13063-023-07657-7 Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. |
spellingShingle | Study Protocol de Graaf, Nine Emmen, Anouk M. L. H. Ramera, Marco Björnsson, Bergthor Boggi, Ugo Bruna, Caro L. Busch, Olivier R. Daams, Freek Ferrari, Giovanni Festen, Sebastiaan van Hilst, Jony D’Hondt, Mathieu Ielpo, Benedetto Keck, Tobias Khatkov, Igor E. Koerkamp, Bas Groot Lips, Daan J. Luyer, Misha D. P. Mieog, J. Sven D. Morelli, Luca Molenaar, I. Quintus van Santvoort, Hjalmar C. Sprangers, Mirjam A. G. Ferrari, Clarissa Berkhof, Johannes Maisonneuve, Patrick Abu Hilal, Mohammad Besselink, Marc G. Minimally invasive versus open pancreatoduodenectomy for pancreatic and peri-ampullary neoplasm (DIPLOMA-2): study protocol for an international multicenter patient-blinded randomized controlled trial |
title | Minimally invasive versus open pancreatoduodenectomy for pancreatic and peri-ampullary neoplasm (DIPLOMA-2): study protocol for an international multicenter patient-blinded randomized controlled trial |
title_full | Minimally invasive versus open pancreatoduodenectomy for pancreatic and peri-ampullary neoplasm (DIPLOMA-2): study protocol for an international multicenter patient-blinded randomized controlled trial |
title_fullStr | Minimally invasive versus open pancreatoduodenectomy for pancreatic and peri-ampullary neoplasm (DIPLOMA-2): study protocol for an international multicenter patient-blinded randomized controlled trial |
title_full_unstemmed | Minimally invasive versus open pancreatoduodenectomy for pancreatic and peri-ampullary neoplasm (DIPLOMA-2): study protocol for an international multicenter patient-blinded randomized controlled trial |
title_short | Minimally invasive versus open pancreatoduodenectomy for pancreatic and peri-ampullary neoplasm (DIPLOMA-2): study protocol for an international multicenter patient-blinded randomized controlled trial |
title_sort | minimally invasive versus open pancreatoduodenectomy for pancreatic and peri-ampullary neoplasm (diploma-2): study protocol for an international multicenter patient-blinded randomized controlled trial |
topic | Study Protocol |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10571285/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37828593 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13063-023-07657-7 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT degraafnine minimallyinvasiveversusopenpancreatoduodenectomyforpancreaticandperiampullaryneoplasmdiploma2studyprotocolforaninternationalmulticenterpatientblindedrandomizedcontrolledtrial AT emmenanoukmlh minimallyinvasiveversusopenpancreatoduodenectomyforpancreaticandperiampullaryneoplasmdiploma2studyprotocolforaninternationalmulticenterpatientblindedrandomizedcontrolledtrial AT rameramarco minimallyinvasiveversusopenpancreatoduodenectomyforpancreaticandperiampullaryneoplasmdiploma2studyprotocolforaninternationalmulticenterpatientblindedrandomizedcontrolledtrial AT bjornssonbergthor minimallyinvasiveversusopenpancreatoduodenectomyforpancreaticandperiampullaryneoplasmdiploma2studyprotocolforaninternationalmulticenterpatientblindedrandomizedcontrolledtrial AT boggiugo minimallyinvasiveversusopenpancreatoduodenectomyforpancreaticandperiampullaryneoplasmdiploma2studyprotocolforaninternationalmulticenterpatientblindedrandomizedcontrolledtrial AT brunacarol minimallyinvasiveversusopenpancreatoduodenectomyforpancreaticandperiampullaryneoplasmdiploma2studyprotocolforaninternationalmulticenterpatientblindedrandomizedcontrolledtrial AT buscholivierr minimallyinvasiveversusopenpancreatoduodenectomyforpancreaticandperiampullaryneoplasmdiploma2studyprotocolforaninternationalmulticenterpatientblindedrandomizedcontrolledtrial AT daamsfreek minimallyinvasiveversusopenpancreatoduodenectomyforpancreaticandperiampullaryneoplasmdiploma2studyprotocolforaninternationalmulticenterpatientblindedrandomizedcontrolledtrial AT ferrarigiovanni minimallyinvasiveversusopenpancreatoduodenectomyforpancreaticandperiampullaryneoplasmdiploma2studyprotocolforaninternationalmulticenterpatientblindedrandomizedcontrolledtrial AT festensebastiaan minimallyinvasiveversusopenpancreatoduodenectomyforpancreaticandperiampullaryneoplasmdiploma2studyprotocolforaninternationalmulticenterpatientblindedrandomizedcontrolledtrial AT vanhilstjony minimallyinvasiveversusopenpancreatoduodenectomyforpancreaticandperiampullaryneoplasmdiploma2studyprotocolforaninternationalmulticenterpatientblindedrandomizedcontrolledtrial AT dhondtmathieu minimallyinvasiveversusopenpancreatoduodenectomyforpancreaticandperiampullaryneoplasmdiploma2studyprotocolforaninternationalmulticenterpatientblindedrandomizedcontrolledtrial AT ielpobenedetto minimallyinvasiveversusopenpancreatoduodenectomyforpancreaticandperiampullaryneoplasmdiploma2studyprotocolforaninternationalmulticenterpatientblindedrandomizedcontrolledtrial AT kecktobias minimallyinvasiveversusopenpancreatoduodenectomyforpancreaticandperiampullaryneoplasmdiploma2studyprotocolforaninternationalmulticenterpatientblindedrandomizedcontrolledtrial AT khatkovigore minimallyinvasiveversusopenpancreatoduodenectomyforpancreaticandperiampullaryneoplasmdiploma2studyprotocolforaninternationalmulticenterpatientblindedrandomizedcontrolledtrial AT koerkampbasgroot minimallyinvasiveversusopenpancreatoduodenectomyforpancreaticandperiampullaryneoplasmdiploma2studyprotocolforaninternationalmulticenterpatientblindedrandomizedcontrolledtrial AT lipsdaanj minimallyinvasiveversusopenpancreatoduodenectomyforpancreaticandperiampullaryneoplasmdiploma2studyprotocolforaninternationalmulticenterpatientblindedrandomizedcontrolledtrial AT luyermishadp minimallyinvasiveversusopenpancreatoduodenectomyforpancreaticandperiampullaryneoplasmdiploma2studyprotocolforaninternationalmulticenterpatientblindedrandomizedcontrolledtrial AT mieogjsvend minimallyinvasiveversusopenpancreatoduodenectomyforpancreaticandperiampullaryneoplasmdiploma2studyprotocolforaninternationalmulticenterpatientblindedrandomizedcontrolledtrial AT morelliluca minimallyinvasiveversusopenpancreatoduodenectomyforpancreaticandperiampullaryneoplasmdiploma2studyprotocolforaninternationalmulticenterpatientblindedrandomizedcontrolledtrial AT molenaariquintus minimallyinvasiveversusopenpancreatoduodenectomyforpancreaticandperiampullaryneoplasmdiploma2studyprotocolforaninternationalmulticenterpatientblindedrandomizedcontrolledtrial AT vansantvoorthjalmarc minimallyinvasiveversusopenpancreatoduodenectomyforpancreaticandperiampullaryneoplasmdiploma2studyprotocolforaninternationalmulticenterpatientblindedrandomizedcontrolledtrial AT sprangersmirjamag minimallyinvasiveversusopenpancreatoduodenectomyforpancreaticandperiampullaryneoplasmdiploma2studyprotocolforaninternationalmulticenterpatientblindedrandomizedcontrolledtrial AT ferrariclarissa minimallyinvasiveversusopenpancreatoduodenectomyforpancreaticandperiampullaryneoplasmdiploma2studyprotocolforaninternationalmulticenterpatientblindedrandomizedcontrolledtrial AT berkhofjohannes minimallyinvasiveversusopenpancreatoduodenectomyforpancreaticandperiampullaryneoplasmdiploma2studyprotocolforaninternationalmulticenterpatientblindedrandomizedcontrolledtrial AT maisonneuvepatrick minimallyinvasiveversusopenpancreatoduodenectomyforpancreaticandperiampullaryneoplasmdiploma2studyprotocolforaninternationalmulticenterpatientblindedrandomizedcontrolledtrial AT abuhilalmohammad minimallyinvasiveversusopenpancreatoduodenectomyforpancreaticandperiampullaryneoplasmdiploma2studyprotocolforaninternationalmulticenterpatientblindedrandomizedcontrolledtrial AT besselinkmarcg minimallyinvasiveversusopenpancreatoduodenectomyforpancreaticandperiampullaryneoplasmdiploma2studyprotocolforaninternationalmulticenterpatientblindedrandomizedcontrolledtrial AT minimallyinvasiveversusopenpancreatoduodenectomyforpancreaticandperiampullaryneoplasmdiploma2studyprotocolforaninternationalmulticenterpatientblindedrandomizedcontrolledtrial |