Cargando…

Minimally invasive versus open pancreatoduodenectomy for pancreatic and peri-ampullary neoplasm (DIPLOMA-2): study protocol for an international multicenter patient-blinded randomized controlled trial

BACKGROUND: Minimally invasive pancreatoduodenectomy (MIPD) aims to reduce the negative impact of surgery as compared to open pancreatoduodenectomy (OPD) and is increasingly becoming part of clinical practice for selected patients worldwide. However, the safety of MIPD remains a topic of debate and...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: de Graaf, Nine, Emmen, Anouk M. L. H., Ramera, Marco, Björnsson, Bergthor, Boggi, Ugo, Bruna, Caro L., Busch, Olivier R., Daams, Freek, Ferrari, Giovanni, Festen, Sebastiaan, van Hilst, Jony, D’Hondt, Mathieu, Ielpo, Benedetto, Keck, Tobias, Khatkov, Igor E., Koerkamp, Bas Groot, Lips, Daan J., Luyer, Misha D. P., Mieog, J. Sven D., Morelli, Luca, Molenaar, I. Quintus, van Santvoort, Hjalmar C., Sprangers, Mirjam A. G., Ferrari, Clarissa, Berkhof, Johannes, Maisonneuve, Patrick, Abu Hilal, Mohammad, Besselink, Marc G.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10571285/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37828593
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13063-023-07657-7
_version_ 1785119955036930048
author de Graaf, Nine
Emmen, Anouk M. L. H.
Ramera, Marco
Björnsson, Bergthor
Boggi, Ugo
Bruna, Caro L.
Busch, Olivier R.
Daams, Freek
Ferrari, Giovanni
Festen, Sebastiaan
van Hilst, Jony
D’Hondt, Mathieu
Ielpo, Benedetto
Keck, Tobias
Khatkov, Igor E.
Koerkamp, Bas Groot
Lips, Daan J.
Luyer, Misha D. P.
Mieog, J. Sven D.
Morelli, Luca
Molenaar, I. Quintus
van Santvoort, Hjalmar C.
Sprangers, Mirjam A. G.
Ferrari, Clarissa
Berkhof, Johannes
Maisonneuve, Patrick
Abu Hilal, Mohammad
Besselink, Marc G.
author_facet de Graaf, Nine
Emmen, Anouk M. L. H.
Ramera, Marco
Björnsson, Bergthor
Boggi, Ugo
Bruna, Caro L.
Busch, Olivier R.
Daams, Freek
Ferrari, Giovanni
Festen, Sebastiaan
van Hilst, Jony
D’Hondt, Mathieu
Ielpo, Benedetto
Keck, Tobias
Khatkov, Igor E.
Koerkamp, Bas Groot
Lips, Daan J.
Luyer, Misha D. P.
Mieog, J. Sven D.
Morelli, Luca
Molenaar, I. Quintus
van Santvoort, Hjalmar C.
Sprangers, Mirjam A. G.
Ferrari, Clarissa
Berkhof, Johannes
Maisonneuve, Patrick
Abu Hilal, Mohammad
Besselink, Marc G.
author_sort de Graaf, Nine
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Minimally invasive pancreatoduodenectomy (MIPD) aims to reduce the negative impact of surgery as compared to open pancreatoduodenectomy (OPD) and is increasingly becoming part of clinical practice for selected patients worldwide. However, the safety of MIPD remains a topic of debate and the potential shorter time to functional recovery needs to be confirmed. To guide safe implementation of MIPD, large-scale international randomized trials comparing MIPD and OPD in experienced high-volume centers are needed. We hypothesize that MIPD is non-inferior in terms of overall complications, but superior regarding time to functional recovery, as compared to OPD. METHODS/DESIGN: The DIPLOMA-2 trial is an international randomized controlled, patient-blinded, non-inferiority trial performed in 14 high-volume pancreatic centers in Europe with a minimum annual volume of 30 MIPD and 30 OPD. A total of 288 patients with an indication for elective pancreatoduodenectomy for pre-malignant and malignant disease, eligible for both open and minimally invasive approach, are randomly allocated for MIPD or OPD in a 2:1 ratio. Centers perform either laparoscopic or robot-assisted MIPD based on their surgical expertise. The primary outcome is the Comprehensive Complication Index (CCI®), measuring all complications graded according to the Clavien-Dindo classification up to 90 days after surgery. The sample size is calculated with the following assumptions: 2.5% one-sided significance level (α), 80% power (1-β), expected difference of the mean CCI® score of 0 points between MIPD and OPD, and a non-inferiority margin of 7.5 points. The main secondary outcome is time to functional recovery, which will be analyzed for superiority. Other secondary outcomes include post-operative 90-day Fitbit™ measured activity, operative outcomes (e.g., blood loss, operative time, conversion to open surgery, surgeon-reported outcomes), oncological findings in case of malignancy (e.g., R0-resection rate, time to adjuvant treatment, survival), postoperative outcomes (e.g., clinically relevant complications), healthcare resource utilization (length of stay, readmissions, intensive care stay), quality of life, and costs. Postoperative follow-up is up to 36 months. DISCUSSION: The DIPLOMA-2 trial aims to establish the safety of MIPD as the new standard of care for this selected patient population undergoing pancreatoduodenectomy in high-volume centers, ultimately aiming for superior patient recovery. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ISRCTN27483786. Registered on August 2, 2023
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10571285
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-105712852023-10-14 Minimally invasive versus open pancreatoduodenectomy for pancreatic and peri-ampullary neoplasm (DIPLOMA-2): study protocol for an international multicenter patient-blinded randomized controlled trial de Graaf, Nine Emmen, Anouk M. L. H. Ramera, Marco Björnsson, Bergthor Boggi, Ugo Bruna, Caro L. Busch, Olivier R. Daams, Freek Ferrari, Giovanni Festen, Sebastiaan van Hilst, Jony D’Hondt, Mathieu Ielpo, Benedetto Keck, Tobias Khatkov, Igor E. Koerkamp, Bas Groot Lips, Daan J. Luyer, Misha D. P. Mieog, J. Sven D. Morelli, Luca Molenaar, I. Quintus van Santvoort, Hjalmar C. Sprangers, Mirjam A. G. Ferrari, Clarissa Berkhof, Johannes Maisonneuve, Patrick Abu Hilal, Mohammad Besselink, Marc G. Trials Study Protocol BACKGROUND: Minimally invasive pancreatoduodenectomy (MIPD) aims to reduce the negative impact of surgery as compared to open pancreatoduodenectomy (OPD) and is increasingly becoming part of clinical practice for selected patients worldwide. However, the safety of MIPD remains a topic of debate and the potential shorter time to functional recovery needs to be confirmed. To guide safe implementation of MIPD, large-scale international randomized trials comparing MIPD and OPD in experienced high-volume centers are needed. We hypothesize that MIPD is non-inferior in terms of overall complications, but superior regarding time to functional recovery, as compared to OPD. METHODS/DESIGN: The DIPLOMA-2 trial is an international randomized controlled, patient-blinded, non-inferiority trial performed in 14 high-volume pancreatic centers in Europe with a minimum annual volume of 30 MIPD and 30 OPD. A total of 288 patients with an indication for elective pancreatoduodenectomy for pre-malignant and malignant disease, eligible for both open and minimally invasive approach, are randomly allocated for MIPD or OPD in a 2:1 ratio. Centers perform either laparoscopic or robot-assisted MIPD based on their surgical expertise. The primary outcome is the Comprehensive Complication Index (CCI®), measuring all complications graded according to the Clavien-Dindo classification up to 90 days after surgery. The sample size is calculated with the following assumptions: 2.5% one-sided significance level (α), 80% power (1-β), expected difference of the mean CCI® score of 0 points between MIPD and OPD, and a non-inferiority margin of 7.5 points. The main secondary outcome is time to functional recovery, which will be analyzed for superiority. Other secondary outcomes include post-operative 90-day Fitbit™ measured activity, operative outcomes (e.g., blood loss, operative time, conversion to open surgery, surgeon-reported outcomes), oncological findings in case of malignancy (e.g., R0-resection rate, time to adjuvant treatment, survival), postoperative outcomes (e.g., clinically relevant complications), healthcare resource utilization (length of stay, readmissions, intensive care stay), quality of life, and costs. Postoperative follow-up is up to 36 months. DISCUSSION: The DIPLOMA-2 trial aims to establish the safety of MIPD as the new standard of care for this selected patient population undergoing pancreatoduodenectomy in high-volume centers, ultimately aiming for superior patient recovery. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ISRCTN27483786. Registered on August 2, 2023 BioMed Central 2023-10-12 /pmc/articles/PMC10571285/ /pubmed/37828593 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13063-023-07657-7 Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Study Protocol
de Graaf, Nine
Emmen, Anouk M. L. H.
Ramera, Marco
Björnsson, Bergthor
Boggi, Ugo
Bruna, Caro L.
Busch, Olivier R.
Daams, Freek
Ferrari, Giovanni
Festen, Sebastiaan
van Hilst, Jony
D’Hondt, Mathieu
Ielpo, Benedetto
Keck, Tobias
Khatkov, Igor E.
Koerkamp, Bas Groot
Lips, Daan J.
Luyer, Misha D. P.
Mieog, J. Sven D.
Morelli, Luca
Molenaar, I. Quintus
van Santvoort, Hjalmar C.
Sprangers, Mirjam A. G.
Ferrari, Clarissa
Berkhof, Johannes
Maisonneuve, Patrick
Abu Hilal, Mohammad
Besselink, Marc G.
Minimally invasive versus open pancreatoduodenectomy for pancreatic and peri-ampullary neoplasm (DIPLOMA-2): study protocol for an international multicenter patient-blinded randomized controlled trial
title Minimally invasive versus open pancreatoduodenectomy for pancreatic and peri-ampullary neoplasm (DIPLOMA-2): study protocol for an international multicenter patient-blinded randomized controlled trial
title_full Minimally invasive versus open pancreatoduodenectomy for pancreatic and peri-ampullary neoplasm (DIPLOMA-2): study protocol for an international multicenter patient-blinded randomized controlled trial
title_fullStr Minimally invasive versus open pancreatoduodenectomy for pancreatic and peri-ampullary neoplasm (DIPLOMA-2): study protocol for an international multicenter patient-blinded randomized controlled trial
title_full_unstemmed Minimally invasive versus open pancreatoduodenectomy for pancreatic and peri-ampullary neoplasm (DIPLOMA-2): study protocol for an international multicenter patient-blinded randomized controlled trial
title_short Minimally invasive versus open pancreatoduodenectomy for pancreatic and peri-ampullary neoplasm (DIPLOMA-2): study protocol for an international multicenter patient-blinded randomized controlled trial
title_sort minimally invasive versus open pancreatoduodenectomy for pancreatic and peri-ampullary neoplasm (diploma-2): study protocol for an international multicenter patient-blinded randomized controlled trial
topic Study Protocol
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10571285/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37828593
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13063-023-07657-7
work_keys_str_mv AT degraafnine minimallyinvasiveversusopenpancreatoduodenectomyforpancreaticandperiampullaryneoplasmdiploma2studyprotocolforaninternationalmulticenterpatientblindedrandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT emmenanoukmlh minimallyinvasiveversusopenpancreatoduodenectomyforpancreaticandperiampullaryneoplasmdiploma2studyprotocolforaninternationalmulticenterpatientblindedrandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT rameramarco minimallyinvasiveversusopenpancreatoduodenectomyforpancreaticandperiampullaryneoplasmdiploma2studyprotocolforaninternationalmulticenterpatientblindedrandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT bjornssonbergthor minimallyinvasiveversusopenpancreatoduodenectomyforpancreaticandperiampullaryneoplasmdiploma2studyprotocolforaninternationalmulticenterpatientblindedrandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT boggiugo minimallyinvasiveversusopenpancreatoduodenectomyforpancreaticandperiampullaryneoplasmdiploma2studyprotocolforaninternationalmulticenterpatientblindedrandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT brunacarol minimallyinvasiveversusopenpancreatoduodenectomyforpancreaticandperiampullaryneoplasmdiploma2studyprotocolforaninternationalmulticenterpatientblindedrandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT buscholivierr minimallyinvasiveversusopenpancreatoduodenectomyforpancreaticandperiampullaryneoplasmdiploma2studyprotocolforaninternationalmulticenterpatientblindedrandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT daamsfreek minimallyinvasiveversusopenpancreatoduodenectomyforpancreaticandperiampullaryneoplasmdiploma2studyprotocolforaninternationalmulticenterpatientblindedrandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT ferrarigiovanni minimallyinvasiveversusopenpancreatoduodenectomyforpancreaticandperiampullaryneoplasmdiploma2studyprotocolforaninternationalmulticenterpatientblindedrandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT festensebastiaan minimallyinvasiveversusopenpancreatoduodenectomyforpancreaticandperiampullaryneoplasmdiploma2studyprotocolforaninternationalmulticenterpatientblindedrandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT vanhilstjony minimallyinvasiveversusopenpancreatoduodenectomyforpancreaticandperiampullaryneoplasmdiploma2studyprotocolforaninternationalmulticenterpatientblindedrandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT dhondtmathieu minimallyinvasiveversusopenpancreatoduodenectomyforpancreaticandperiampullaryneoplasmdiploma2studyprotocolforaninternationalmulticenterpatientblindedrandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT ielpobenedetto minimallyinvasiveversusopenpancreatoduodenectomyforpancreaticandperiampullaryneoplasmdiploma2studyprotocolforaninternationalmulticenterpatientblindedrandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT kecktobias minimallyinvasiveversusopenpancreatoduodenectomyforpancreaticandperiampullaryneoplasmdiploma2studyprotocolforaninternationalmulticenterpatientblindedrandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT khatkovigore minimallyinvasiveversusopenpancreatoduodenectomyforpancreaticandperiampullaryneoplasmdiploma2studyprotocolforaninternationalmulticenterpatientblindedrandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT koerkampbasgroot minimallyinvasiveversusopenpancreatoduodenectomyforpancreaticandperiampullaryneoplasmdiploma2studyprotocolforaninternationalmulticenterpatientblindedrandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT lipsdaanj minimallyinvasiveversusopenpancreatoduodenectomyforpancreaticandperiampullaryneoplasmdiploma2studyprotocolforaninternationalmulticenterpatientblindedrandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT luyermishadp minimallyinvasiveversusopenpancreatoduodenectomyforpancreaticandperiampullaryneoplasmdiploma2studyprotocolforaninternationalmulticenterpatientblindedrandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT mieogjsvend minimallyinvasiveversusopenpancreatoduodenectomyforpancreaticandperiampullaryneoplasmdiploma2studyprotocolforaninternationalmulticenterpatientblindedrandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT morelliluca minimallyinvasiveversusopenpancreatoduodenectomyforpancreaticandperiampullaryneoplasmdiploma2studyprotocolforaninternationalmulticenterpatientblindedrandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT molenaariquintus minimallyinvasiveversusopenpancreatoduodenectomyforpancreaticandperiampullaryneoplasmdiploma2studyprotocolforaninternationalmulticenterpatientblindedrandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT vansantvoorthjalmarc minimallyinvasiveversusopenpancreatoduodenectomyforpancreaticandperiampullaryneoplasmdiploma2studyprotocolforaninternationalmulticenterpatientblindedrandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT sprangersmirjamag minimallyinvasiveversusopenpancreatoduodenectomyforpancreaticandperiampullaryneoplasmdiploma2studyprotocolforaninternationalmulticenterpatientblindedrandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT ferrariclarissa minimallyinvasiveversusopenpancreatoduodenectomyforpancreaticandperiampullaryneoplasmdiploma2studyprotocolforaninternationalmulticenterpatientblindedrandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT berkhofjohannes minimallyinvasiveversusopenpancreatoduodenectomyforpancreaticandperiampullaryneoplasmdiploma2studyprotocolforaninternationalmulticenterpatientblindedrandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT maisonneuvepatrick minimallyinvasiveversusopenpancreatoduodenectomyforpancreaticandperiampullaryneoplasmdiploma2studyprotocolforaninternationalmulticenterpatientblindedrandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT abuhilalmohammad minimallyinvasiveversusopenpancreatoduodenectomyforpancreaticandperiampullaryneoplasmdiploma2studyprotocolforaninternationalmulticenterpatientblindedrandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT besselinkmarcg minimallyinvasiveversusopenpancreatoduodenectomyforpancreaticandperiampullaryneoplasmdiploma2studyprotocolforaninternationalmulticenterpatientblindedrandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT minimallyinvasiveversusopenpancreatoduodenectomyforpancreaticandperiampullaryneoplasmdiploma2studyprotocolforaninternationalmulticenterpatientblindedrandomizedcontrolledtrial