Cargando…

Vertebral bone quality different in magnetic resonance imaging parameters

OBJECTIVE: This was a single-center retrospective study that aimed to measure the vertebral bone quality (VBQ) in people of all ages and compare changes in VBQ across ages. Differences in VBQ under various MRI parameters were compared. METHODS: We first screened patients without underlying disease a...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Liu, Xiang-Ge, Chen, Xin, Chen, Biao, Liang, Pei-Jie, Liu, Han-Hui, Fu, Meiqi
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10571331/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37828514
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13018-023-04268-5
_version_ 1785119966209507328
author Liu, Xiang-Ge
Chen, Xin
Chen, Biao
Liang, Pei-Jie
Liu, Han-Hui
Fu, Meiqi
author_facet Liu, Xiang-Ge
Chen, Xin
Chen, Biao
Liang, Pei-Jie
Liu, Han-Hui
Fu, Meiqi
author_sort Liu, Xiang-Ge
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: This was a single-center retrospective study that aimed to measure the vertebral bone quality (VBQ) in people of all ages and compare changes in VBQ across ages. Differences in VBQ under various MRI parameters were compared. METHODS: We first screened patients without underlying disease and no history of fractures who underwent lumbar MRI in our center in the past four years. Over the span of 10 years, 200 patients (100 males and 100 females) were randomly recruited into each cohort to undergo 1.5 T and 3.0 T MRI scans. Subsequently, we tabulated the number of patients admitted to our hospital with OVCF over the past four years. There were 30 healthy adults under 4 times of MRI scans in different parameters to determine the differentiation of VBQ. The 30 healthy adults were recruited to validate the differentiation of VBQ under various parameters. RESULTS: A total of 2400 patients without OVCF and 405 patients with OVCF were enrolled. The VBQ value of 1.5 T was significantly higher compared with that of 3.0 T (2.769 ± 0.494 > 2.199 ± 0.432, P < 0.0001). VBQ of 43.31 kHz in 1.5 T was significantly lower than that of 35.36 kHz (2.447 ± 0.350 < 2.632 ± 0.280, P < 0.05). The differentiation of VBQ in 1.5 T and 3.0 T was validated using results of healthy adults. CONCLUSIONS: VBQ is an effective tool for differentiating patients with OVCF and can be used as a primary screening tool for osteoporosis. However, VBQ is significantly affected by magnetic field intensity and bandwidth and cannot achieve its universality as it originally proposed.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10571331
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-105713312023-10-14 Vertebral bone quality different in magnetic resonance imaging parameters Liu, Xiang-Ge Chen, Xin Chen, Biao Liang, Pei-Jie Liu, Han-Hui Fu, Meiqi J Orthop Surg Res Correspondence OBJECTIVE: This was a single-center retrospective study that aimed to measure the vertebral bone quality (VBQ) in people of all ages and compare changes in VBQ across ages. Differences in VBQ under various MRI parameters were compared. METHODS: We first screened patients without underlying disease and no history of fractures who underwent lumbar MRI in our center in the past four years. Over the span of 10 years, 200 patients (100 males and 100 females) were randomly recruited into each cohort to undergo 1.5 T and 3.0 T MRI scans. Subsequently, we tabulated the number of patients admitted to our hospital with OVCF over the past four years. There were 30 healthy adults under 4 times of MRI scans in different parameters to determine the differentiation of VBQ. The 30 healthy adults were recruited to validate the differentiation of VBQ under various parameters. RESULTS: A total of 2400 patients without OVCF and 405 patients with OVCF were enrolled. The VBQ value of 1.5 T was significantly higher compared with that of 3.0 T (2.769 ± 0.494 > 2.199 ± 0.432, P < 0.0001). VBQ of 43.31 kHz in 1.5 T was significantly lower than that of 35.36 kHz (2.447 ± 0.350 < 2.632 ± 0.280, P < 0.05). The differentiation of VBQ in 1.5 T and 3.0 T was validated using results of healthy adults. CONCLUSIONS: VBQ is an effective tool for differentiating patients with OVCF and can be used as a primary screening tool for osteoporosis. However, VBQ is significantly affected by magnetic field intensity and bandwidth and cannot achieve its universality as it originally proposed. BioMed Central 2023-10-12 /pmc/articles/PMC10571331/ /pubmed/37828514 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13018-023-04268-5 Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Correspondence
Liu, Xiang-Ge
Chen, Xin
Chen, Biao
Liang, Pei-Jie
Liu, Han-Hui
Fu, Meiqi
Vertebral bone quality different in magnetic resonance imaging parameters
title Vertebral bone quality different in magnetic resonance imaging parameters
title_full Vertebral bone quality different in magnetic resonance imaging parameters
title_fullStr Vertebral bone quality different in magnetic resonance imaging parameters
title_full_unstemmed Vertebral bone quality different in magnetic resonance imaging parameters
title_short Vertebral bone quality different in magnetic resonance imaging parameters
title_sort vertebral bone quality different in magnetic resonance imaging parameters
topic Correspondence
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10571331/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37828514
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13018-023-04268-5
work_keys_str_mv AT liuxiangge vertebralbonequalitydifferentinmagneticresonanceimagingparameters
AT chenxin vertebralbonequalitydifferentinmagneticresonanceimagingparameters
AT chenbiao vertebralbonequalitydifferentinmagneticresonanceimagingparameters
AT liangpeijie vertebralbonequalitydifferentinmagneticresonanceimagingparameters
AT liuhanhui vertebralbonequalitydifferentinmagneticresonanceimagingparameters
AT fumeiqi vertebralbonequalitydifferentinmagneticresonanceimagingparameters