Cargando…
The PRISMATIC project: protocol for a research programme on novel methods to improve reporting and peer review of systematic reviews of health evidence
BACKGROUND: Incomplete reporting about what systematic reviewers did and what they found prevents users of the report from being able to fully interpret the findings and understand the limitations of the underlying evidence. Reporting guidelines such as the PRISMA statement and its extensions are de...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10571343/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37833767 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13643-023-02363-6 |
_version_ | 1785119968776421376 |
---|---|
author | Page, Matthew J. Moher, David Brennan, Sue McKenzie, Joanne E. |
author_facet | Page, Matthew J. Moher, David Brennan, Sue McKenzie, Joanne E. |
author_sort | Page, Matthew J. |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Incomplete reporting about what systematic reviewers did and what they found prevents users of the report from being able to fully interpret the findings and understand the limitations of the underlying evidence. Reporting guidelines such as the PRISMA statement and its extensions are designed to improve reporting. However, there are important inconsistencies across the various PRISMA reporting guidelines, which causes confusion and misinterpretation. Coupled with this, users might need to consult multiple guidelines to gain a full understanding of the guidance. Furthermore, the current passive strategy of implementing PRISMA has not fully brought about needed improvements in the completeness of systematic review reporting. METHODS: The PRISMATIC (‘PRISMA, Technology, and Implementation to enhance reporting Completeness’) project aims to use novel methods to enable more efficient and effective translation of PRISMA reporting guidelines into practice. We will establish a working group who will develop a unified PRISMA statement that harmonises content across the main PRISMA guideline and several of its extensions. We will then develop a web application that generates a reporting template and checklist customised to the characteristics and methods of a systematic review (‘PRISMA-Web app’) and conduct a randomised trial to evaluate its impact on authors’ reporting. We will also develop a web application that helps peer reviewers appraise systematic review manuscripts (‘PRISMA-Peer app’) and conduct a diagnostic accuracy study to evaluate its impact on peer reviewers’ detection of incomplete reporting. DISCUSSION: We anticipate the novel guidance and web-based apps developed throughout the project will substantively enhance the completeness of reporting of systematic reviews of health evidence, ultimately benefiting users who rely on systematic reviews to inform health care decision-making. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10571343 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-105713432023-10-14 The PRISMATIC project: protocol for a research programme on novel methods to improve reporting and peer review of systematic reviews of health evidence Page, Matthew J. Moher, David Brennan, Sue McKenzie, Joanne E. Syst Rev Protocol BACKGROUND: Incomplete reporting about what systematic reviewers did and what they found prevents users of the report from being able to fully interpret the findings and understand the limitations of the underlying evidence. Reporting guidelines such as the PRISMA statement and its extensions are designed to improve reporting. However, there are important inconsistencies across the various PRISMA reporting guidelines, which causes confusion and misinterpretation. Coupled with this, users might need to consult multiple guidelines to gain a full understanding of the guidance. Furthermore, the current passive strategy of implementing PRISMA has not fully brought about needed improvements in the completeness of systematic review reporting. METHODS: The PRISMATIC (‘PRISMA, Technology, and Implementation to enhance reporting Completeness’) project aims to use novel methods to enable more efficient and effective translation of PRISMA reporting guidelines into practice. We will establish a working group who will develop a unified PRISMA statement that harmonises content across the main PRISMA guideline and several of its extensions. We will then develop a web application that generates a reporting template and checklist customised to the characteristics and methods of a systematic review (‘PRISMA-Web app’) and conduct a randomised trial to evaluate its impact on authors’ reporting. We will also develop a web application that helps peer reviewers appraise systematic review manuscripts (‘PRISMA-Peer app’) and conduct a diagnostic accuracy study to evaluate its impact on peer reviewers’ detection of incomplete reporting. DISCUSSION: We anticipate the novel guidance and web-based apps developed throughout the project will substantively enhance the completeness of reporting of systematic reviews of health evidence, ultimately benefiting users who rely on systematic reviews to inform health care decision-making. BioMed Central 2023-10-13 /pmc/articles/PMC10571343/ /pubmed/37833767 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13643-023-02363-6 Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. |
spellingShingle | Protocol Page, Matthew J. Moher, David Brennan, Sue McKenzie, Joanne E. The PRISMATIC project: protocol for a research programme on novel methods to improve reporting and peer review of systematic reviews of health evidence |
title | The PRISMATIC project: protocol for a research programme on novel methods to improve reporting and peer review of systematic reviews of health evidence |
title_full | The PRISMATIC project: protocol for a research programme on novel methods to improve reporting and peer review of systematic reviews of health evidence |
title_fullStr | The PRISMATIC project: protocol for a research programme on novel methods to improve reporting and peer review of systematic reviews of health evidence |
title_full_unstemmed | The PRISMATIC project: protocol for a research programme on novel methods to improve reporting and peer review of systematic reviews of health evidence |
title_short | The PRISMATIC project: protocol for a research programme on novel methods to improve reporting and peer review of systematic reviews of health evidence |
title_sort | prismatic project: protocol for a research programme on novel methods to improve reporting and peer review of systematic reviews of health evidence |
topic | Protocol |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10571343/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37833767 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13643-023-02363-6 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT pagematthewj theprismaticprojectprotocolforaresearchprogrammeonnovelmethodstoimprovereportingandpeerreviewofsystematicreviewsofhealthevidence AT moherdavid theprismaticprojectprotocolforaresearchprogrammeonnovelmethodstoimprovereportingandpeerreviewofsystematicreviewsofhealthevidence AT brennansue theprismaticprojectprotocolforaresearchprogrammeonnovelmethodstoimprovereportingandpeerreviewofsystematicreviewsofhealthevidence AT mckenziejoannee theprismaticprojectprotocolforaresearchprogrammeonnovelmethodstoimprovereportingandpeerreviewofsystematicreviewsofhealthevidence AT pagematthewj prismaticprojectprotocolforaresearchprogrammeonnovelmethodstoimprovereportingandpeerreviewofsystematicreviewsofhealthevidence AT moherdavid prismaticprojectprotocolforaresearchprogrammeonnovelmethodstoimprovereportingandpeerreviewofsystematicreviewsofhealthevidence AT brennansue prismaticprojectprotocolforaresearchprogrammeonnovelmethodstoimprovereportingandpeerreviewofsystematicreviewsofhealthevidence AT mckenziejoannee prismaticprojectprotocolforaresearchprogrammeonnovelmethodstoimprovereportingandpeerreviewofsystematicreviewsofhealthevidence |