Cargando…
The PRISMATIC project: protocol for a research programme on novel methods to improve reporting and peer review of systematic reviews of health evidence
BACKGROUND: Incomplete reporting about what systematic reviewers did and what they found prevents users of the report from being able to fully interpret the findings and understand the limitations of the underlying evidence. Reporting guidelines such as the PRISMA statement and its extensions are de...
Autores principales: | Page, Matthew J., Moher, David, Brennan, Sue, McKenzie, Joanne E. |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10571343/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37833767 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13643-023-02363-6 |
Ejemplares similares
-
The REPRISE project: protocol for an evaluation of REProducibility and Replicability In Syntheses of Evidence
por: Page, Matthew J., et al.
Publicado: (2021) -
Evidence map of studies evaluating methods for conducting, interpreting and reporting overviews of systematic reviews of interventions: rationale and design
por: Lunny, Carole, et al.
Publicado: (2016) -
Effectiveness of aromatherapy for prevention or treatment of disease, medical or preclinical conditions, and injury: protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis
por: Brennan, Sue E., et al.
Publicado: (2022) -
An empirical investigation of the potential impact of selective inclusion of results in systematic reviews of interventions: study protocol
por: Page, Matthew J, et al.
Publicado: (2013) -
The use of ‘PICO for synthesis’ and methods for synthesis without meta-analysis: protocol for a survey of current practice in systematic reviews of health interventions
por: Cumpston, Miranda S., et al.
Publicado: (2021)