Cargando…

Surgical outcomes of laparoscopic proximal gastrectomy for upper-third gastric cancer: esophagogastrostomy, gastric tube reconstruction, and double-tract reconstruction

BACKGROUND: There is no consensus on the optimal reconstruction technique after proximal gastrectomy. The purpose of this study was to retrospectively compare the surgical outcomes among esophagogastrostomy (EG) anastomosis, gastric tube (GT) reconstruction and double-tract (DT) reconstruction in pa...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Chen, Jianhua, Wang, Fei, Gao, Shuyang, Yang, Yapeng, Zhao, Ziming, Shi, Jiahao, Wang, Liuhua, Ren, Jun
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10571476/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37828530
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12893-023-02219-9
_version_ 1785120010604118016
author Chen, Jianhua
Wang, Fei
Gao, Shuyang
Yang, Yapeng
Zhao, Ziming
Shi, Jiahao
Wang, Liuhua
Ren, Jun
author_facet Chen, Jianhua
Wang, Fei
Gao, Shuyang
Yang, Yapeng
Zhao, Ziming
Shi, Jiahao
Wang, Liuhua
Ren, Jun
author_sort Chen, Jianhua
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: There is no consensus on the optimal reconstruction technique after proximal gastrectomy. The purpose of this study was to retrospectively compare the surgical outcomes among esophagogastrostomy (EG) anastomosis, gastric tube (GT) reconstruction and double-tract (DT) reconstruction in patients who underwent laparoscopic proximal gastrectomy (LPG) to clarify the superior reconstruction method. METHODS: This study enrolled 164 patients who underwent LPG at the Northern Jiangsu People's Hospital in Jiangsu between January 2017 to January 2022 (EG: 51 patients; GT: 77 patients; DT: 36 patients). We compared the clinical and pathological characteristics, surgical features, postoperative complications, nutritional status, and quality of life (QOL) among the above three groups. RESULTS: Mean operative time was longer with the DT group than the remaining two groups (p = 0.001). With regard to postoperative complications, considerable differences in the postoperative reflux symptoms (p = 0.042) and reflux esophagitis (p = 0.040) among the three groups were found. For the nutritional status, total protein, hemoglobin and albumin reduction rates in the GT group were significantly higher than the other two groups at 12 months postoperatively. In the PGSAS-45, three assessment items were better in the DT group significantly compared with the esophageal reflux subscale (p = 0.047, Cohen’s d = 0.44), dissatisfaction at the meal (p = 0.009, Cohen’s d = 0.58), and dissatisfaction for daily life subscale (p = 0.012, Cohen’s d = 0.56). CONCLUSIONS: DT after LPG is a valuable reconstruction technique with satisfactory surgical outcomes, especially regarding reduced reflux symptoms, improving the postoperative nutritional status and QOL.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10571476
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-105714762023-10-14 Surgical outcomes of laparoscopic proximal gastrectomy for upper-third gastric cancer: esophagogastrostomy, gastric tube reconstruction, and double-tract reconstruction Chen, Jianhua Wang, Fei Gao, Shuyang Yang, Yapeng Zhao, Ziming Shi, Jiahao Wang, Liuhua Ren, Jun BMC Surg Research BACKGROUND: There is no consensus on the optimal reconstruction technique after proximal gastrectomy. The purpose of this study was to retrospectively compare the surgical outcomes among esophagogastrostomy (EG) anastomosis, gastric tube (GT) reconstruction and double-tract (DT) reconstruction in patients who underwent laparoscopic proximal gastrectomy (LPG) to clarify the superior reconstruction method. METHODS: This study enrolled 164 patients who underwent LPG at the Northern Jiangsu People's Hospital in Jiangsu between January 2017 to January 2022 (EG: 51 patients; GT: 77 patients; DT: 36 patients). We compared the clinical and pathological characteristics, surgical features, postoperative complications, nutritional status, and quality of life (QOL) among the above three groups. RESULTS: Mean operative time was longer with the DT group than the remaining two groups (p = 0.001). With regard to postoperative complications, considerable differences in the postoperative reflux symptoms (p = 0.042) and reflux esophagitis (p = 0.040) among the three groups were found. For the nutritional status, total protein, hemoglobin and albumin reduction rates in the GT group were significantly higher than the other two groups at 12 months postoperatively. In the PGSAS-45, three assessment items were better in the DT group significantly compared with the esophageal reflux subscale (p = 0.047, Cohen’s d = 0.44), dissatisfaction at the meal (p = 0.009, Cohen’s d = 0.58), and dissatisfaction for daily life subscale (p = 0.012, Cohen’s d = 0.56). CONCLUSIONS: DT after LPG is a valuable reconstruction technique with satisfactory surgical outcomes, especially regarding reduced reflux symptoms, improving the postoperative nutritional status and QOL. BioMed Central 2023-10-12 /pmc/articles/PMC10571476/ /pubmed/37828530 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12893-023-02219-9 Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research
Chen, Jianhua
Wang, Fei
Gao, Shuyang
Yang, Yapeng
Zhao, Ziming
Shi, Jiahao
Wang, Liuhua
Ren, Jun
Surgical outcomes of laparoscopic proximal gastrectomy for upper-third gastric cancer: esophagogastrostomy, gastric tube reconstruction, and double-tract reconstruction
title Surgical outcomes of laparoscopic proximal gastrectomy for upper-third gastric cancer: esophagogastrostomy, gastric tube reconstruction, and double-tract reconstruction
title_full Surgical outcomes of laparoscopic proximal gastrectomy for upper-third gastric cancer: esophagogastrostomy, gastric tube reconstruction, and double-tract reconstruction
title_fullStr Surgical outcomes of laparoscopic proximal gastrectomy for upper-third gastric cancer: esophagogastrostomy, gastric tube reconstruction, and double-tract reconstruction
title_full_unstemmed Surgical outcomes of laparoscopic proximal gastrectomy for upper-third gastric cancer: esophagogastrostomy, gastric tube reconstruction, and double-tract reconstruction
title_short Surgical outcomes of laparoscopic proximal gastrectomy for upper-third gastric cancer: esophagogastrostomy, gastric tube reconstruction, and double-tract reconstruction
title_sort surgical outcomes of laparoscopic proximal gastrectomy for upper-third gastric cancer: esophagogastrostomy, gastric tube reconstruction, and double-tract reconstruction
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10571476/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37828530
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12893-023-02219-9
work_keys_str_mv AT chenjianhua surgicaloutcomesoflaparoscopicproximalgastrectomyforupperthirdgastriccanceresophagogastrostomygastrictubereconstructionanddoubletractreconstruction
AT wangfei surgicaloutcomesoflaparoscopicproximalgastrectomyforupperthirdgastriccanceresophagogastrostomygastrictubereconstructionanddoubletractreconstruction
AT gaoshuyang surgicaloutcomesoflaparoscopicproximalgastrectomyforupperthirdgastriccanceresophagogastrostomygastrictubereconstructionanddoubletractreconstruction
AT yangyapeng surgicaloutcomesoflaparoscopicproximalgastrectomyforupperthirdgastriccanceresophagogastrostomygastrictubereconstructionanddoubletractreconstruction
AT zhaoziming surgicaloutcomesoflaparoscopicproximalgastrectomyforupperthirdgastriccanceresophagogastrostomygastrictubereconstructionanddoubletractreconstruction
AT shijiahao surgicaloutcomesoflaparoscopicproximalgastrectomyforupperthirdgastriccanceresophagogastrostomygastrictubereconstructionanddoubletractreconstruction
AT wangliuhua surgicaloutcomesoflaparoscopicproximalgastrectomyforupperthirdgastriccanceresophagogastrostomygastrictubereconstructionanddoubletractreconstruction
AT renjun surgicaloutcomesoflaparoscopicproximalgastrectomyforupperthirdgastriccanceresophagogastrostomygastrictubereconstructionanddoubletractreconstruction