Cargando…
Surgical outcomes of laparoscopic proximal gastrectomy for upper-third gastric cancer: esophagogastrostomy, gastric tube reconstruction, and double-tract reconstruction
BACKGROUND: There is no consensus on the optimal reconstruction technique after proximal gastrectomy. The purpose of this study was to retrospectively compare the surgical outcomes among esophagogastrostomy (EG) anastomosis, gastric tube (GT) reconstruction and double-tract (DT) reconstruction in pa...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10571476/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37828530 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12893-023-02219-9 |
_version_ | 1785120010604118016 |
---|---|
author | Chen, Jianhua Wang, Fei Gao, Shuyang Yang, Yapeng Zhao, Ziming Shi, Jiahao Wang, Liuhua Ren, Jun |
author_facet | Chen, Jianhua Wang, Fei Gao, Shuyang Yang, Yapeng Zhao, Ziming Shi, Jiahao Wang, Liuhua Ren, Jun |
author_sort | Chen, Jianhua |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: There is no consensus on the optimal reconstruction technique after proximal gastrectomy. The purpose of this study was to retrospectively compare the surgical outcomes among esophagogastrostomy (EG) anastomosis, gastric tube (GT) reconstruction and double-tract (DT) reconstruction in patients who underwent laparoscopic proximal gastrectomy (LPG) to clarify the superior reconstruction method. METHODS: This study enrolled 164 patients who underwent LPG at the Northern Jiangsu People's Hospital in Jiangsu between January 2017 to January 2022 (EG: 51 patients; GT: 77 patients; DT: 36 patients). We compared the clinical and pathological characteristics, surgical features, postoperative complications, nutritional status, and quality of life (QOL) among the above three groups. RESULTS: Mean operative time was longer with the DT group than the remaining two groups (p = 0.001). With regard to postoperative complications, considerable differences in the postoperative reflux symptoms (p = 0.042) and reflux esophagitis (p = 0.040) among the three groups were found. For the nutritional status, total protein, hemoglobin and albumin reduction rates in the GT group were significantly higher than the other two groups at 12 months postoperatively. In the PGSAS-45, three assessment items were better in the DT group significantly compared with the esophageal reflux subscale (p = 0.047, Cohen’s d = 0.44), dissatisfaction at the meal (p = 0.009, Cohen’s d = 0.58), and dissatisfaction for daily life subscale (p = 0.012, Cohen’s d = 0.56). CONCLUSIONS: DT after LPG is a valuable reconstruction technique with satisfactory surgical outcomes, especially regarding reduced reflux symptoms, improving the postoperative nutritional status and QOL. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10571476 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-105714762023-10-14 Surgical outcomes of laparoscopic proximal gastrectomy for upper-third gastric cancer: esophagogastrostomy, gastric tube reconstruction, and double-tract reconstruction Chen, Jianhua Wang, Fei Gao, Shuyang Yang, Yapeng Zhao, Ziming Shi, Jiahao Wang, Liuhua Ren, Jun BMC Surg Research BACKGROUND: There is no consensus on the optimal reconstruction technique after proximal gastrectomy. The purpose of this study was to retrospectively compare the surgical outcomes among esophagogastrostomy (EG) anastomosis, gastric tube (GT) reconstruction and double-tract (DT) reconstruction in patients who underwent laparoscopic proximal gastrectomy (LPG) to clarify the superior reconstruction method. METHODS: This study enrolled 164 patients who underwent LPG at the Northern Jiangsu People's Hospital in Jiangsu between January 2017 to January 2022 (EG: 51 patients; GT: 77 patients; DT: 36 patients). We compared the clinical and pathological characteristics, surgical features, postoperative complications, nutritional status, and quality of life (QOL) among the above three groups. RESULTS: Mean operative time was longer with the DT group than the remaining two groups (p = 0.001). With regard to postoperative complications, considerable differences in the postoperative reflux symptoms (p = 0.042) and reflux esophagitis (p = 0.040) among the three groups were found. For the nutritional status, total protein, hemoglobin and albumin reduction rates in the GT group were significantly higher than the other two groups at 12 months postoperatively. In the PGSAS-45, three assessment items were better in the DT group significantly compared with the esophageal reflux subscale (p = 0.047, Cohen’s d = 0.44), dissatisfaction at the meal (p = 0.009, Cohen’s d = 0.58), and dissatisfaction for daily life subscale (p = 0.012, Cohen’s d = 0.56). CONCLUSIONS: DT after LPG is a valuable reconstruction technique with satisfactory surgical outcomes, especially regarding reduced reflux symptoms, improving the postoperative nutritional status and QOL. BioMed Central 2023-10-12 /pmc/articles/PMC10571476/ /pubmed/37828530 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12893-023-02219-9 Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. |
spellingShingle | Research Chen, Jianhua Wang, Fei Gao, Shuyang Yang, Yapeng Zhao, Ziming Shi, Jiahao Wang, Liuhua Ren, Jun Surgical outcomes of laparoscopic proximal gastrectomy for upper-third gastric cancer: esophagogastrostomy, gastric tube reconstruction, and double-tract reconstruction |
title | Surgical outcomes of laparoscopic proximal gastrectomy for upper-third gastric cancer: esophagogastrostomy, gastric tube reconstruction, and double-tract reconstruction |
title_full | Surgical outcomes of laparoscopic proximal gastrectomy for upper-third gastric cancer: esophagogastrostomy, gastric tube reconstruction, and double-tract reconstruction |
title_fullStr | Surgical outcomes of laparoscopic proximal gastrectomy for upper-third gastric cancer: esophagogastrostomy, gastric tube reconstruction, and double-tract reconstruction |
title_full_unstemmed | Surgical outcomes of laparoscopic proximal gastrectomy for upper-third gastric cancer: esophagogastrostomy, gastric tube reconstruction, and double-tract reconstruction |
title_short | Surgical outcomes of laparoscopic proximal gastrectomy for upper-third gastric cancer: esophagogastrostomy, gastric tube reconstruction, and double-tract reconstruction |
title_sort | surgical outcomes of laparoscopic proximal gastrectomy for upper-third gastric cancer: esophagogastrostomy, gastric tube reconstruction, and double-tract reconstruction |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10571476/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37828530 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12893-023-02219-9 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT chenjianhua surgicaloutcomesoflaparoscopicproximalgastrectomyforupperthirdgastriccanceresophagogastrostomygastrictubereconstructionanddoubletractreconstruction AT wangfei surgicaloutcomesoflaparoscopicproximalgastrectomyforupperthirdgastriccanceresophagogastrostomygastrictubereconstructionanddoubletractreconstruction AT gaoshuyang surgicaloutcomesoflaparoscopicproximalgastrectomyforupperthirdgastriccanceresophagogastrostomygastrictubereconstructionanddoubletractreconstruction AT yangyapeng surgicaloutcomesoflaparoscopicproximalgastrectomyforupperthirdgastriccanceresophagogastrostomygastrictubereconstructionanddoubletractreconstruction AT zhaoziming surgicaloutcomesoflaparoscopicproximalgastrectomyforupperthirdgastriccanceresophagogastrostomygastrictubereconstructionanddoubletractreconstruction AT shijiahao surgicaloutcomesoflaparoscopicproximalgastrectomyforupperthirdgastriccanceresophagogastrostomygastrictubereconstructionanddoubletractreconstruction AT wangliuhua surgicaloutcomesoflaparoscopicproximalgastrectomyforupperthirdgastriccanceresophagogastrostomygastrictubereconstructionanddoubletractreconstruction AT renjun surgicaloutcomesoflaparoscopicproximalgastrectomyforupperthirdgastriccanceresophagogastrostomygastrictubereconstructionanddoubletractreconstruction |