Penile-Sparing Surgery for Tumour Recurrence after Previous Glansectomy/Partial Penectomy: Treatment Feasibility and Oncological Outcomes

SIMPLE SUMMARY: To date, no specific analyses focusing on penile-sparing surgery for local tumour recurrence after previous glansectomy or partial penectomy have been reported. We addressed this void and we considered a retrospective series of consecutive patients treated at a single institution. We...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Musi, Gennaro, Molinari, Filippo, Mistretta, Francesco A., Piccinelli, Mattia Luca, Guzzo, Sonia, Tozzi, Marco, Lievore, Elena, Blezien, Oskar, Fontana, Matteo, Cioffi, Antonio, Cullurà, Daniela, Verri, Elena, Cossu Rocca, Maria, Nolè, Franco, Ferro, Matteo, de Cobelli, Ottavio, Luzzago, Stefano
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2023
Materias:
Article
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10571586/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37835501
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/cancers15194807
Descripción
Sumario:SIMPLE SUMMARY: To date, no specific analyses focusing on penile-sparing surgery for local tumour recurrence after previous glansectomy or partial penectomy have been reported. We addressed this void and we considered a retrospective series of consecutive patients treated at a single institution. We focused on: (1) treatment feasibility, (2) complications, and (3) oncological outcomes. ABSTRACT: We tested the feasibility and oncological outcomes after penile-sparing surgery (PSS) for local recurrent penile cancer after a previous glansectomy/partial penectomy. We retrospectively analysed 13 patients (1997–2022) with local recurrence of penile cancer after a previous glansectomy or partial penectomy. All patients underwent PSS: circumcision, excision, or laser ablation. First, technical feasibility, treatment setting, and complications (Clavien–Dindo) were recorded. Second, Kaplan–Meier plots depicted overall and local recurrences over time. Overall, 11 (84.5%) vs. 2 (15.5%) patients were previously treated with glansectomy vs. partial penectomy. The median (IQR) time to disease recurrence was 56 (13–88) months. Six (46%) vs. two (15.5%) vs. five (38.5%) patients were treated with, respectively, local excision vs. local excision + circumcision vs. laser ablation. All procedures, except one, were performed in an outpatient setting. Only one Clavien–Dindo 2 complication was recorded. The median follow-up time was 41 months. Overall, three (23%) vs. four (30.5%) patients experienced local vs. overall recurrence, respectively. All local recurrences were safely treated with salvage surgery. In conclusion, we reported the results of a preliminary analysis testing safety, feasibility, and early oncological outcomes of PSS procedures for patients with local recurrence after previous glansectomy or partial penectomy. Stronger oncological outcomes should be tested in other series to optimise patient selection.

Ejemplares similares