Cargando…

Complementary and alternative medicine for long COVID: a systematic review of randomized controlled trials

BACKGROUND: Complementary and alternative medicine (CAM) interventions are growing in popularity as possible treatments for long COVID symptoms. However, comprehensive analysis of current evidence in this setting is still lacking. OBJECTIVE: This study aims to review existing published studies on th...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Yang, Juan, Lim, Kia Hui, Lim, Kia Teng, Woods, Jeffrey T., Mohabbat, Arya B., Wahner-Roedler, Dietlind L., Ganesh, Ravindra, Bauer, Brent A.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: SAGE Publications 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10571674/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37841213
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/20406223231204727
_version_ 1785120056426889216
author Yang, Juan
Lim, Kia Hui
Lim, Kia Teng
Woods, Jeffrey T.
Mohabbat, Arya B.
Wahner-Roedler, Dietlind L.
Ganesh, Ravindra
Bauer, Brent A.
author_facet Yang, Juan
Lim, Kia Hui
Lim, Kia Teng
Woods, Jeffrey T.
Mohabbat, Arya B.
Wahner-Roedler, Dietlind L.
Ganesh, Ravindra
Bauer, Brent A.
author_sort Yang, Juan
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Complementary and alternative medicine (CAM) interventions are growing in popularity as possible treatments for long COVID symptoms. However, comprehensive analysis of current evidence in this setting is still lacking. OBJECTIVE: This study aims to review existing published studies on the use of CAM interventions for patients experiencing long COVID through a systematic review. DESIGN: Systematic review of randomized controlled trials (RCTs). METHODS: A comprehensive electronic literature search was performed in multiple databases and clinical trial registries from September 2019 to January 2023. RCTs evaluating efficacy and safety of CAM for long COVID were included. Methodological quality of each included trial was appraised with the Cochrane ‘risk of bias’ tool. A qualitative analysis was conducted due to heterogeneity of included studies. RESULTS: A total of 14 RCTs with 1195 participants were included in this review. Study findings demonstrated that CAM interventions could benefit patients with long COVID, especially those suffering from neuropsychiatric disorders, olfactory dysfunction, cognitive impairment, fatigue, breathlessness, and mild-to-moderate lung fibrosis. The main interventions reported were self-administered transcutaneous auricular vagus nerve stimulation, neuro-meditation, dietary supplements, olfactory training, aromatherapy, inspiratory muscle training, concurrent training, and an online breathing and well-being program. CONCLUSION: CAM interventions may be effective, safe, and acceptable to patients with symptoms of long COVID. However, the findings from this systematic review should be interpreted with caution due to various methodological limitations. More rigorous trials focused on CAM for long COVID are warranted in the future.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10571674
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher SAGE Publications
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-105716742023-10-14 Complementary and alternative medicine for long COVID: a systematic review of randomized controlled trials Yang, Juan Lim, Kia Hui Lim, Kia Teng Woods, Jeffrey T. Mohabbat, Arya B. Wahner-Roedler, Dietlind L. Ganesh, Ravindra Bauer, Brent A. Ther Adv Chronic Dis Systematic Review BACKGROUND: Complementary and alternative medicine (CAM) interventions are growing in popularity as possible treatments for long COVID symptoms. However, comprehensive analysis of current evidence in this setting is still lacking. OBJECTIVE: This study aims to review existing published studies on the use of CAM interventions for patients experiencing long COVID through a systematic review. DESIGN: Systematic review of randomized controlled trials (RCTs). METHODS: A comprehensive electronic literature search was performed in multiple databases and clinical trial registries from September 2019 to January 2023. RCTs evaluating efficacy and safety of CAM for long COVID were included. Methodological quality of each included trial was appraised with the Cochrane ‘risk of bias’ tool. A qualitative analysis was conducted due to heterogeneity of included studies. RESULTS: A total of 14 RCTs with 1195 participants were included in this review. Study findings demonstrated that CAM interventions could benefit patients with long COVID, especially those suffering from neuropsychiatric disorders, olfactory dysfunction, cognitive impairment, fatigue, breathlessness, and mild-to-moderate lung fibrosis. The main interventions reported were self-administered transcutaneous auricular vagus nerve stimulation, neuro-meditation, dietary supplements, olfactory training, aromatherapy, inspiratory muscle training, concurrent training, and an online breathing and well-being program. CONCLUSION: CAM interventions may be effective, safe, and acceptable to patients with symptoms of long COVID. However, the findings from this systematic review should be interpreted with caution due to various methodological limitations. More rigorous trials focused on CAM for long COVID are warranted in the future. SAGE Publications 2023-10-11 /pmc/articles/PMC10571674/ /pubmed/37841213 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/20406223231204727 Text en © The Author(s), 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits non-commercial use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access pages (https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage).
spellingShingle Systematic Review
Yang, Juan
Lim, Kia Hui
Lim, Kia Teng
Woods, Jeffrey T.
Mohabbat, Arya B.
Wahner-Roedler, Dietlind L.
Ganesh, Ravindra
Bauer, Brent A.
Complementary and alternative medicine for long COVID: a systematic review of randomized controlled trials
title Complementary and alternative medicine for long COVID: a systematic review of randomized controlled trials
title_full Complementary and alternative medicine for long COVID: a systematic review of randomized controlled trials
title_fullStr Complementary and alternative medicine for long COVID: a systematic review of randomized controlled trials
title_full_unstemmed Complementary and alternative medicine for long COVID: a systematic review of randomized controlled trials
title_short Complementary and alternative medicine for long COVID: a systematic review of randomized controlled trials
title_sort complementary and alternative medicine for long covid: a systematic review of randomized controlled trials
topic Systematic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10571674/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37841213
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/20406223231204727
work_keys_str_mv AT yangjuan complementaryandalternativemedicineforlongcovidasystematicreviewofrandomizedcontrolledtrials
AT limkiahui complementaryandalternativemedicineforlongcovidasystematicreviewofrandomizedcontrolledtrials
AT limkiateng complementaryandalternativemedicineforlongcovidasystematicreviewofrandomizedcontrolledtrials
AT woodsjeffreyt complementaryandalternativemedicineforlongcovidasystematicreviewofrandomizedcontrolledtrials
AT mohabbataryab complementaryandalternativemedicineforlongcovidasystematicreviewofrandomizedcontrolledtrials
AT wahnerroedlerdietlindl complementaryandalternativemedicineforlongcovidasystematicreviewofrandomizedcontrolledtrials
AT ganeshravindra complementaryandalternativemedicineforlongcovidasystematicreviewofrandomizedcontrolledtrials
AT bauerbrenta complementaryandalternativemedicineforlongcovidasystematicreviewofrandomizedcontrolledtrials