Interventions with Social Integration Components Addressing Psychosocial Outcomes of Young- and Middle-Aged Adult Cancer Individuals: A Systematic Review

SIMPLE SUMMARY: Adult cancer patients and survivors often experience social integration and connectedness chal-lenges. This systematic review summarizes the effect of social integration or social connectedness interventions among young- and middle-aged cancer patients and survivors based on 28 empirical studies published between 2000 and 2021. We found that social integration interventions that utilize technology- and/or non-technology-based platforms show improved social outcomes, increased awareness about available cancer-related resources, decreased perceived isolation, increased knowledge and access to cancer survivorship resources, and improved patient-reported outcomes among cancer individuals versus the comparison individuals. We recommend utilizing suitable platforms, whether technological or non-technological, to facilitate connections between cancer patients/survivors with friends, fellow cancer patients, or society members. This will enable pa-tients/survivors to access essential resources and support, thus enhancing their ability to cope with challenging life situations and ultimately improving social well-being and health outcomes. ABSTRACT: Background: The majority of adult cancer patients/survivors encounter social challenges (e.g., obtaining social support, maintaining social relationships, feelings of social isolation). This systematic review summarizes intervention studies addressing social integration or social connectedness issues among young- and middle-aged cancer patients/survivors. Methods: We searched the PubMed, CINAHL, and Web of Science databases (January 2000–May 2021) to identify intervention studies that addressed social integration, social connectedness, social support, and social isolation for cancer patients/survivors in young- and middle-aged adulthood (18–64.9 years) through a randomized controlled trial (RCT). We categorized the interventions as technology-based, non-technology-based, and mixed-type (technology- and non-technology-based). Results: A total of 28 studies were identified. These interventions demonstrated improved social outcomes (e.g., increased social support, decreased loneliness), increased awareness of available cancer-related resources, and better patient-reported outcomes among patients/survivors versus controls. Specifically, the use of internet-based discussion sessions was associated with improved social cohesion and social support. Receiving social support from peers through networking sites was associated with improved physical activity. Additionally, implementing mixed-type interventions led to better social support from peer survivors, less fear of social interactions, and improved social connectedness. Conclusions: Using existing technology- and/or non-technology-based platforms to facilitate social connectedness among cancer patients/survivors in young- or middle-aged adulthood can help them cope with stressful life circumstances and improve quality-of-life. Further interventions targeting social integration (e.g., social network interventions) are needed to improve the complex social integration challenges experienced by cancer patients and survivors.