Enhanced Photovoltaic Properties of Y6 Derivatives with Asymmetric Terminal Groups: A Theoretical Insight

Y6 derivatives with asymmetric terminal groups have attracted considerable attention in recent years. However, the effects of the asymmetric modification of terminal groups on the photovoltaic performance of Y6 derivatives are not well understood yet. Therefore, we designed a series of Y6-based acceptors with asymmetric terminal groups by endowing them with various electron-withdrawing abilities and different conjugated rings to conduct systematic research. The electron-withdrawing ability of the Y6-D1 terminal group (substituted by IC-2F and IC-2NO(2) terminals) is strongest, followed by Y6 (substituted by two same IC-2F terminals), Y6-D2 (substituted by IC-2F and 2-(4-oxo-4,5-dihydro-6H-cyclopenta[b]thiophen-6-ylidene)malononitrile terminals), Y6-D4 (substituted by IC-2F and indene ring), and Y6-D3 (substituted by IC-2F and thiazole ring). Computed results show that A–A stacking is the main molecular packing mode of Y6 and four other asymmetric Y6 derivatives. The ratios of A–A stacking face-on configuration of Y6-D1, Y6-D2, Y6-D3, Y6-D4, and Y6 are 51.6%, 55.0%, 43.5%, 59.3%, and 62.4%, respectively. Except for Y6-D1 substituted by the IC-2F and IC-2NO(2) (the strongest electron-withdrawing capacity) terminal groups, the other three asymmetric molecules are mainly electron-transporting and can therefore act as acceptors. The open-circuit voltages of organic solar cells (OSCs) based on Y6-D2, Y6-D3, and Y6-D4, except for Y6-D1, may be higher than those of OSCs based on the Y6 acceptor because of their higher energy levels of lowest unoccupied molecular orbital (LUMO). PM6/Y6-D3 and PM6/Y6-D4 have better light absorption properties than PM6/Y6 due to their higher total oscillator strength. These results indicate that Y6-D3 and Y6-D4 can be employed as good acceptors.