Cargando…

A Clinical Incivility Management Module for Nursing Students: A Quasi-Experimental Study

Background: Incivility experienced by pre-licensure nursing students in clinical settings continues to grow. Interventions for clinical incivility to nursing students are needed. Our study aimed to examine the effects of a piloted two-hour interactive incivility management module on nursing students...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kim, Younglee, Kim, Sook Young, Hong, Eunhee, Brandt, Cheryl
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10572766/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37830717
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/healthcare11192680
Descripción
Sumario:Background: Incivility experienced by pre-licensure nursing students in clinical settings continues to grow. Interventions for clinical incivility to nursing students are needed. Our study aimed to examine the effects of a piloted two-hour interactive incivility management module on nursing students’ perceived stress and general self-efficacy levels and preparedness for responding professionally to clinical incivility. Methods: A quasi-experimental post-test-only non-equivalent comparison design with control and experimental groups was used. Senior nursing students enrolled in a Bachelor of Science in Nursing program from a nursing college located in Seoul, South Korea, were recruited. The control group (n = 94) completed a self-administered online survey without the clinical incivility management module. The experimental group (n = 93) completed the same survey after receiving the clinical incivility management module. The two groups’ survey data were compared; qualitative data from the experimental group’s post-module debriefing session were also analyzed. Results: The prevalence of reported clinical incivility was 72.73% (n = 137 out of 187 participants). Clinical incivility experienced by the experimental group was significantly lower than that of the control group (z = −4.865, p < 0.001). However, there was no significant difference in stress levels and self-efficacy between the two groups. The mean score of the experimental group on preparedness for responding professionally to clinical incivility was statistically higher than the control group’s mean score (z = −2.850, p = 0.004). Conclusions: Interventions to prepare students for the experience of clinical incivility are useful; they can positively affect the students’ ability to respond professionally.