Cargando…
Artificial Intelligence and Radiomics: Clinical Applications for Patients with Advanced Melanoma Treated with Immunotherapy
Immunotherapy has greatly improved the outcomes of patients with metastatic melanoma. However, it has also led to new patterns of response and progression, creating an unmet need for better biomarkers to identify patients likely to achieve a lasting clinical benefit or experience immune-related adve...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10573034/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37835808 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics13193065 |
_version_ | 1785120371759906816 |
---|---|
author | McGale, Jeremy Hama, Jakob Yeh, Randy Vercellino, Laetitia Sun, Roger Lopci, Egesta Ammari, Samy Dercle, Laurent |
author_facet | McGale, Jeremy Hama, Jakob Yeh, Randy Vercellino, Laetitia Sun, Roger Lopci, Egesta Ammari, Samy Dercle, Laurent |
author_sort | McGale, Jeremy |
collection | PubMed |
description | Immunotherapy has greatly improved the outcomes of patients with metastatic melanoma. However, it has also led to new patterns of response and progression, creating an unmet need for better biomarkers to identify patients likely to achieve a lasting clinical benefit or experience immune-related adverse events. In this study, we performed a focused literature survey covering the application of artificial intelligence (AI; in the form of radiomics, machine learning, and deep learning) to patients diagnosed with melanoma and treated with immunotherapy, reviewing 12 studies relevant to the topic published up to early 2022. The most commonly investigated imaging modality was CT imaging in isolation (n = 9, 75.0%), while patient cohorts were most frequently recruited retrospectively and from single institutions (n = 7, 58.3%). Most studies concerned the development of AI tools to assist in prognostication (n = 5, 41.7%) or the prediction of treatment response (n = 6, 50.0%). Validation methods were disparate, with two studies (16.7%) performing no validation and equal numbers using cross-validation (n = 3, 25%), a validation set (n = 3, 25%), or a test set (n = 3, 25%). Only one study used both validation and test sets (n = 1, 8.3%). Overall, promising results have been observed for the application of AI to immunotherapy-treated melanoma. Further improvement and eventual integration into clinical practice may be achieved through the implementation of rigorous validation using heterogeneous, prospective patient cohorts. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10573034 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-105730342023-10-14 Artificial Intelligence and Radiomics: Clinical Applications for Patients with Advanced Melanoma Treated with Immunotherapy McGale, Jeremy Hama, Jakob Yeh, Randy Vercellino, Laetitia Sun, Roger Lopci, Egesta Ammari, Samy Dercle, Laurent Diagnostics (Basel) Review Immunotherapy has greatly improved the outcomes of patients with metastatic melanoma. However, it has also led to new patterns of response and progression, creating an unmet need for better biomarkers to identify patients likely to achieve a lasting clinical benefit or experience immune-related adverse events. In this study, we performed a focused literature survey covering the application of artificial intelligence (AI; in the form of radiomics, machine learning, and deep learning) to patients diagnosed with melanoma and treated with immunotherapy, reviewing 12 studies relevant to the topic published up to early 2022. The most commonly investigated imaging modality was CT imaging in isolation (n = 9, 75.0%), while patient cohorts were most frequently recruited retrospectively and from single institutions (n = 7, 58.3%). Most studies concerned the development of AI tools to assist in prognostication (n = 5, 41.7%) or the prediction of treatment response (n = 6, 50.0%). Validation methods were disparate, with two studies (16.7%) performing no validation and equal numbers using cross-validation (n = 3, 25%), a validation set (n = 3, 25%), or a test set (n = 3, 25%). Only one study used both validation and test sets (n = 1, 8.3%). Overall, promising results have been observed for the application of AI to immunotherapy-treated melanoma. Further improvement and eventual integration into clinical practice may be achieved through the implementation of rigorous validation using heterogeneous, prospective patient cohorts. MDPI 2023-09-27 /pmc/articles/PMC10573034/ /pubmed/37835808 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics13193065 Text en © 2023 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Review McGale, Jeremy Hama, Jakob Yeh, Randy Vercellino, Laetitia Sun, Roger Lopci, Egesta Ammari, Samy Dercle, Laurent Artificial Intelligence and Radiomics: Clinical Applications for Patients with Advanced Melanoma Treated with Immunotherapy |
title | Artificial Intelligence and Radiomics: Clinical Applications for Patients with Advanced Melanoma Treated with Immunotherapy |
title_full | Artificial Intelligence and Radiomics: Clinical Applications for Patients with Advanced Melanoma Treated with Immunotherapy |
title_fullStr | Artificial Intelligence and Radiomics: Clinical Applications for Patients with Advanced Melanoma Treated with Immunotherapy |
title_full_unstemmed | Artificial Intelligence and Radiomics: Clinical Applications for Patients with Advanced Melanoma Treated with Immunotherapy |
title_short | Artificial Intelligence and Radiomics: Clinical Applications for Patients with Advanced Melanoma Treated with Immunotherapy |
title_sort | artificial intelligence and radiomics: clinical applications for patients with advanced melanoma treated with immunotherapy |
topic | Review |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10573034/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37835808 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics13193065 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT mcgalejeremy artificialintelligenceandradiomicsclinicalapplicationsforpatientswithadvancedmelanomatreatedwithimmunotherapy AT hamajakob artificialintelligenceandradiomicsclinicalapplicationsforpatientswithadvancedmelanomatreatedwithimmunotherapy AT yehrandy artificialintelligenceandradiomicsclinicalapplicationsforpatientswithadvancedmelanomatreatedwithimmunotherapy AT vercellinolaetitia artificialintelligenceandradiomicsclinicalapplicationsforpatientswithadvancedmelanomatreatedwithimmunotherapy AT sunroger artificialintelligenceandradiomicsclinicalapplicationsforpatientswithadvancedmelanomatreatedwithimmunotherapy AT lopciegesta artificialintelligenceandradiomicsclinicalapplicationsforpatientswithadvancedmelanomatreatedwithimmunotherapy AT ammarisamy artificialintelligenceandradiomicsclinicalapplicationsforpatientswithadvancedmelanomatreatedwithimmunotherapy AT derclelaurent artificialintelligenceandradiomicsclinicalapplicationsforpatientswithadvancedmelanomatreatedwithimmunotherapy |