Cargando…

Comparison of McGrath Videolaryngoscope versus Macintosh Laryngoscope in Tracheal Intubation: An Updated Systematic Review

(1) Background: In the last few years, many randomized controlled trials (RCTs) have compared direct Macintosh laryngoscopy with McGrath videolaryngoscopy in order to assess the potential benefits of the latter; the results were sometimes controversial. (2) Methods: We conducted a comprehensive lite...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Sansone, Pasquale, Giaccari, Luca Gregorio, Bonomo, Antonio, Gargano, Francesca, Aurilio, Caterina, Coppolino, Francesco, Passavanti, Maria Beatrice, Pota, Vincenzo, Pace, Maria Caterina
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10573091/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37834812
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm12196168
_version_ 1785120384689897472
author Sansone, Pasquale
Giaccari, Luca Gregorio
Bonomo, Antonio
Gargano, Francesca
Aurilio, Caterina
Coppolino, Francesco
Passavanti, Maria Beatrice
Pota, Vincenzo
Pace, Maria Caterina
author_facet Sansone, Pasquale
Giaccari, Luca Gregorio
Bonomo, Antonio
Gargano, Francesca
Aurilio, Caterina
Coppolino, Francesco
Passavanti, Maria Beatrice
Pota, Vincenzo
Pace, Maria Caterina
author_sort Sansone, Pasquale
collection PubMed
description (1) Background: In the last few years, many randomized controlled trials (RCTs) have compared direct Macintosh laryngoscopy with McGrath videolaryngoscopy in order to assess the potential benefits of the latter; the results were sometimes controversial. (2) Methods: We conducted a comprehensive literature search to identify our articles according to inclusion and exclusion criteria: to be included, each study had to be a prospective randomized trial or comparison between the McGrath videolaryngoscope and the Macintosh laryngoscope in an adult population. We did not include manikin trials or studies involving double-lumen tubes. (3) Results: 10 studies met the inclusion criteria necessary. In total, 655 patients were intubated with the McGrath and 629 with the Macintosh. In total, 1268 of 1284 patients were successfully intubated, showing equivalent results for the two devices: 648 of 655 patients with the McGrath videolaryngoscope and 620 of 629 patients with the Macintosh laryngoscope. No differences were noted in terms of hemodynamic changes or the incidence of adverse events. (4) Conclusions: We can assert that the McGrath videolaryngoscope and Macintosh laryngoscope, even if with equivalent tracheal intubation results, supplement each other.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10573091
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-105730912023-10-14 Comparison of McGrath Videolaryngoscope versus Macintosh Laryngoscope in Tracheal Intubation: An Updated Systematic Review Sansone, Pasquale Giaccari, Luca Gregorio Bonomo, Antonio Gargano, Francesca Aurilio, Caterina Coppolino, Francesco Passavanti, Maria Beatrice Pota, Vincenzo Pace, Maria Caterina J Clin Med Systematic Review (1) Background: In the last few years, many randomized controlled trials (RCTs) have compared direct Macintosh laryngoscopy with McGrath videolaryngoscopy in order to assess the potential benefits of the latter; the results were sometimes controversial. (2) Methods: We conducted a comprehensive literature search to identify our articles according to inclusion and exclusion criteria: to be included, each study had to be a prospective randomized trial or comparison between the McGrath videolaryngoscope and the Macintosh laryngoscope in an adult population. We did not include manikin trials or studies involving double-lumen tubes. (3) Results: 10 studies met the inclusion criteria necessary. In total, 655 patients were intubated with the McGrath and 629 with the Macintosh. In total, 1268 of 1284 patients were successfully intubated, showing equivalent results for the two devices: 648 of 655 patients with the McGrath videolaryngoscope and 620 of 629 patients with the Macintosh laryngoscope. No differences were noted in terms of hemodynamic changes or the incidence of adverse events. (4) Conclusions: We can assert that the McGrath videolaryngoscope and Macintosh laryngoscope, even if with equivalent tracheal intubation results, supplement each other. MDPI 2023-09-24 /pmc/articles/PMC10573091/ /pubmed/37834812 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm12196168 Text en © 2023 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Systematic Review
Sansone, Pasquale
Giaccari, Luca Gregorio
Bonomo, Antonio
Gargano, Francesca
Aurilio, Caterina
Coppolino, Francesco
Passavanti, Maria Beatrice
Pota, Vincenzo
Pace, Maria Caterina
Comparison of McGrath Videolaryngoscope versus Macintosh Laryngoscope in Tracheal Intubation: An Updated Systematic Review
title Comparison of McGrath Videolaryngoscope versus Macintosh Laryngoscope in Tracheal Intubation: An Updated Systematic Review
title_full Comparison of McGrath Videolaryngoscope versus Macintosh Laryngoscope in Tracheal Intubation: An Updated Systematic Review
title_fullStr Comparison of McGrath Videolaryngoscope versus Macintosh Laryngoscope in Tracheal Intubation: An Updated Systematic Review
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of McGrath Videolaryngoscope versus Macintosh Laryngoscope in Tracheal Intubation: An Updated Systematic Review
title_short Comparison of McGrath Videolaryngoscope versus Macintosh Laryngoscope in Tracheal Intubation: An Updated Systematic Review
title_sort comparison of mcgrath videolaryngoscope versus macintosh laryngoscope in tracheal intubation: an updated systematic review
topic Systematic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10573091/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37834812
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm12196168
work_keys_str_mv AT sansonepasquale comparisonofmcgrathvideolaryngoscopeversusmacintoshlaryngoscopeintrachealintubationanupdatedsystematicreview
AT giaccarilucagregorio comparisonofmcgrathvideolaryngoscopeversusmacintoshlaryngoscopeintrachealintubationanupdatedsystematicreview
AT bonomoantonio comparisonofmcgrathvideolaryngoscopeversusmacintoshlaryngoscopeintrachealintubationanupdatedsystematicreview
AT garganofrancesca comparisonofmcgrathvideolaryngoscopeversusmacintoshlaryngoscopeintrachealintubationanupdatedsystematicreview
AT auriliocaterina comparisonofmcgrathvideolaryngoscopeversusmacintoshlaryngoscopeintrachealintubationanupdatedsystematicreview
AT coppolinofrancesco comparisonofmcgrathvideolaryngoscopeversusmacintoshlaryngoscopeintrachealintubationanupdatedsystematicreview
AT passavantimariabeatrice comparisonofmcgrathvideolaryngoscopeversusmacintoshlaryngoscopeintrachealintubationanupdatedsystematicreview
AT potavincenzo comparisonofmcgrathvideolaryngoscopeversusmacintoshlaryngoscopeintrachealintubationanupdatedsystematicreview
AT pacemariacaterina comparisonofmcgrathvideolaryngoscopeversusmacintoshlaryngoscopeintrachealintubationanupdatedsystematicreview