Cargando…
Comparison of McGrath Videolaryngoscope versus Macintosh Laryngoscope in Tracheal Intubation: An Updated Systematic Review
(1) Background: In the last few years, many randomized controlled trials (RCTs) have compared direct Macintosh laryngoscopy with McGrath videolaryngoscopy in order to assess the potential benefits of the latter; the results were sometimes controversial. (2) Methods: We conducted a comprehensive lite...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10573091/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37834812 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm12196168 |
_version_ | 1785120384689897472 |
---|---|
author | Sansone, Pasquale Giaccari, Luca Gregorio Bonomo, Antonio Gargano, Francesca Aurilio, Caterina Coppolino, Francesco Passavanti, Maria Beatrice Pota, Vincenzo Pace, Maria Caterina |
author_facet | Sansone, Pasquale Giaccari, Luca Gregorio Bonomo, Antonio Gargano, Francesca Aurilio, Caterina Coppolino, Francesco Passavanti, Maria Beatrice Pota, Vincenzo Pace, Maria Caterina |
author_sort | Sansone, Pasquale |
collection | PubMed |
description | (1) Background: In the last few years, many randomized controlled trials (RCTs) have compared direct Macintosh laryngoscopy with McGrath videolaryngoscopy in order to assess the potential benefits of the latter; the results were sometimes controversial. (2) Methods: We conducted a comprehensive literature search to identify our articles according to inclusion and exclusion criteria: to be included, each study had to be a prospective randomized trial or comparison between the McGrath videolaryngoscope and the Macintosh laryngoscope in an adult population. We did not include manikin trials or studies involving double-lumen tubes. (3) Results: 10 studies met the inclusion criteria necessary. In total, 655 patients were intubated with the McGrath and 629 with the Macintosh. In total, 1268 of 1284 patients were successfully intubated, showing equivalent results for the two devices: 648 of 655 patients with the McGrath videolaryngoscope and 620 of 629 patients with the Macintosh laryngoscope. No differences were noted in terms of hemodynamic changes or the incidence of adverse events. (4) Conclusions: We can assert that the McGrath videolaryngoscope and Macintosh laryngoscope, even if with equivalent tracheal intubation results, supplement each other. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10573091 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-105730912023-10-14 Comparison of McGrath Videolaryngoscope versus Macintosh Laryngoscope in Tracheal Intubation: An Updated Systematic Review Sansone, Pasquale Giaccari, Luca Gregorio Bonomo, Antonio Gargano, Francesca Aurilio, Caterina Coppolino, Francesco Passavanti, Maria Beatrice Pota, Vincenzo Pace, Maria Caterina J Clin Med Systematic Review (1) Background: In the last few years, many randomized controlled trials (RCTs) have compared direct Macintosh laryngoscopy with McGrath videolaryngoscopy in order to assess the potential benefits of the latter; the results were sometimes controversial. (2) Methods: We conducted a comprehensive literature search to identify our articles according to inclusion and exclusion criteria: to be included, each study had to be a prospective randomized trial or comparison between the McGrath videolaryngoscope and the Macintosh laryngoscope in an adult population. We did not include manikin trials or studies involving double-lumen tubes. (3) Results: 10 studies met the inclusion criteria necessary. In total, 655 patients were intubated with the McGrath and 629 with the Macintosh. In total, 1268 of 1284 patients were successfully intubated, showing equivalent results for the two devices: 648 of 655 patients with the McGrath videolaryngoscope and 620 of 629 patients with the Macintosh laryngoscope. No differences were noted in terms of hemodynamic changes or the incidence of adverse events. (4) Conclusions: We can assert that the McGrath videolaryngoscope and Macintosh laryngoscope, even if with equivalent tracheal intubation results, supplement each other. MDPI 2023-09-24 /pmc/articles/PMC10573091/ /pubmed/37834812 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm12196168 Text en © 2023 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Systematic Review Sansone, Pasquale Giaccari, Luca Gregorio Bonomo, Antonio Gargano, Francesca Aurilio, Caterina Coppolino, Francesco Passavanti, Maria Beatrice Pota, Vincenzo Pace, Maria Caterina Comparison of McGrath Videolaryngoscope versus Macintosh Laryngoscope in Tracheal Intubation: An Updated Systematic Review |
title | Comparison of McGrath Videolaryngoscope versus Macintosh Laryngoscope in Tracheal Intubation: An Updated Systematic Review |
title_full | Comparison of McGrath Videolaryngoscope versus Macintosh Laryngoscope in Tracheal Intubation: An Updated Systematic Review |
title_fullStr | Comparison of McGrath Videolaryngoscope versus Macintosh Laryngoscope in Tracheal Intubation: An Updated Systematic Review |
title_full_unstemmed | Comparison of McGrath Videolaryngoscope versus Macintosh Laryngoscope in Tracheal Intubation: An Updated Systematic Review |
title_short | Comparison of McGrath Videolaryngoscope versus Macintosh Laryngoscope in Tracheal Intubation: An Updated Systematic Review |
title_sort | comparison of mcgrath videolaryngoscope versus macintosh laryngoscope in tracheal intubation: an updated systematic review |
topic | Systematic Review |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10573091/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37834812 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm12196168 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT sansonepasquale comparisonofmcgrathvideolaryngoscopeversusmacintoshlaryngoscopeintrachealintubationanupdatedsystematicreview AT giaccarilucagregorio comparisonofmcgrathvideolaryngoscopeversusmacintoshlaryngoscopeintrachealintubationanupdatedsystematicreview AT bonomoantonio comparisonofmcgrathvideolaryngoscopeversusmacintoshlaryngoscopeintrachealintubationanupdatedsystematicreview AT garganofrancesca comparisonofmcgrathvideolaryngoscopeversusmacintoshlaryngoscopeintrachealintubationanupdatedsystematicreview AT auriliocaterina comparisonofmcgrathvideolaryngoscopeversusmacintoshlaryngoscopeintrachealintubationanupdatedsystematicreview AT coppolinofrancesco comparisonofmcgrathvideolaryngoscopeversusmacintoshlaryngoscopeintrachealintubationanupdatedsystematicreview AT passavantimariabeatrice comparisonofmcgrathvideolaryngoscopeversusmacintoshlaryngoscopeintrachealintubationanupdatedsystematicreview AT potavincenzo comparisonofmcgrathvideolaryngoscopeversusmacintoshlaryngoscopeintrachealintubationanupdatedsystematicreview AT pacemariacaterina comparisonofmcgrathvideolaryngoscopeversusmacintoshlaryngoscopeintrachealintubationanupdatedsystematicreview |