Cargando…

Good Mid-Term Implant Survival of a Novel Single-Design Rotating-Hinge Total Knee Arthroplasty

Background: Rotating-hinge knee (RHK) implants are an option for knee arthroplasty in cases of instability or severe bone loss. However, the revision rate can be increased compared to unconstrained implants which mandate improvements in implant design. This study investigates a novel RHK design for...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Schlechter, Matthias, Theil, Christoph, Gosheger, Georg, Moellenbeck, Burkhard, Schwarze, Jan, Puetzler, Jan, Bockholt, Sebastian
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10573219/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37834758
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm12196113
_version_ 1785120411888910336
author Schlechter, Matthias
Theil, Christoph
Gosheger, Georg
Moellenbeck, Burkhard
Schwarze, Jan
Puetzler, Jan
Bockholt, Sebastian
author_facet Schlechter, Matthias
Theil, Christoph
Gosheger, Georg
Moellenbeck, Burkhard
Schwarze, Jan
Puetzler, Jan
Bockholt, Sebastian
author_sort Schlechter, Matthias
collection PubMed
description Background: Rotating-hinge knee (RHK) implants are an option for knee arthroplasty in cases of instability or severe bone loss. However, the revision rate can be increased compared to unconstrained implants which mandate improvements in implant design. This study investigates a novel RHK design for total knee arthroplasty (TKA). Methods: Retrospective analysis of a single design RHK TKA (GenuX MK, Implantcast) implanted between 2015 and 2019 including 133 patients (21 primary TKA, 112 revisions). The main indication for revision TKA was second-stage reimplantation following infection. The median follow-up amounted to 30 months (IQR 22–47). Results: In total, 13% (18/133) of patients underwent revision surgery after a mean time of 1 month (IQR 0–6). The main reason for the revision was (re-) infection in 8% of patients. All revisions were performed following revision TKA and none following primary TKA. There were no revision surgeries for loosening or instability. The revision-free implant survival of 83% was (95% CI 75–91%) after five years. A higher number of previous surgeries was associated with a greater revision risk (p = 0.05). Conclusion: Revision and complex primary TKA using a single-design RHK implant results in good implant survival at mid-term follow-up although infection remains a major concern.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10573219
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-105732192023-10-14 Good Mid-Term Implant Survival of a Novel Single-Design Rotating-Hinge Total Knee Arthroplasty Schlechter, Matthias Theil, Christoph Gosheger, Georg Moellenbeck, Burkhard Schwarze, Jan Puetzler, Jan Bockholt, Sebastian J Clin Med Article Background: Rotating-hinge knee (RHK) implants are an option for knee arthroplasty in cases of instability or severe bone loss. However, the revision rate can be increased compared to unconstrained implants which mandate improvements in implant design. This study investigates a novel RHK design for total knee arthroplasty (TKA). Methods: Retrospective analysis of a single design RHK TKA (GenuX MK, Implantcast) implanted between 2015 and 2019 including 133 patients (21 primary TKA, 112 revisions). The main indication for revision TKA was second-stage reimplantation following infection. The median follow-up amounted to 30 months (IQR 22–47). Results: In total, 13% (18/133) of patients underwent revision surgery after a mean time of 1 month (IQR 0–6). The main reason for the revision was (re-) infection in 8% of patients. All revisions were performed following revision TKA and none following primary TKA. There were no revision surgeries for loosening or instability. The revision-free implant survival of 83% was (95% CI 75–91%) after five years. A higher number of previous surgeries was associated with a greater revision risk (p = 0.05). Conclusion: Revision and complex primary TKA using a single-design RHK implant results in good implant survival at mid-term follow-up although infection remains a major concern. MDPI 2023-09-22 /pmc/articles/PMC10573219/ /pubmed/37834758 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm12196113 Text en © 2023 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Schlechter, Matthias
Theil, Christoph
Gosheger, Georg
Moellenbeck, Burkhard
Schwarze, Jan
Puetzler, Jan
Bockholt, Sebastian
Good Mid-Term Implant Survival of a Novel Single-Design Rotating-Hinge Total Knee Arthroplasty
title Good Mid-Term Implant Survival of a Novel Single-Design Rotating-Hinge Total Knee Arthroplasty
title_full Good Mid-Term Implant Survival of a Novel Single-Design Rotating-Hinge Total Knee Arthroplasty
title_fullStr Good Mid-Term Implant Survival of a Novel Single-Design Rotating-Hinge Total Knee Arthroplasty
title_full_unstemmed Good Mid-Term Implant Survival of a Novel Single-Design Rotating-Hinge Total Knee Arthroplasty
title_short Good Mid-Term Implant Survival of a Novel Single-Design Rotating-Hinge Total Knee Arthroplasty
title_sort good mid-term implant survival of a novel single-design rotating-hinge total knee arthroplasty
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10573219/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37834758
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm12196113
work_keys_str_mv AT schlechtermatthias goodmidtermimplantsurvivalofanovelsingledesignrotatinghingetotalkneearthroplasty
AT theilchristoph goodmidtermimplantsurvivalofanovelsingledesignrotatinghingetotalkneearthroplasty
AT goshegergeorg goodmidtermimplantsurvivalofanovelsingledesignrotatinghingetotalkneearthroplasty
AT moellenbeckburkhard goodmidtermimplantsurvivalofanovelsingledesignrotatinghingetotalkneearthroplasty
AT schwarzejan goodmidtermimplantsurvivalofanovelsingledesignrotatinghingetotalkneearthroplasty
AT puetzlerjan goodmidtermimplantsurvivalofanovelsingledesignrotatinghingetotalkneearthroplasty
AT bockholtsebastian goodmidtermimplantsurvivalofanovelsingledesignrotatinghingetotalkneearthroplasty