Cargando…

Modeling of Eyld2000-2d Anisotropic Yield Criterion Considering Strength Differential Effect and Analysis of Optimal Calibration Strategy

Sheet metals usually experience various loading paths such as uniaxial tension, uniaxial compression, biaxial tension, and simple shear during the forming process. However, the existing constitutive models cannot always accurately describe blanks’ anisotropic yield and plastic flow behavior of blank...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Du, Kai, Dong, Li, Zhang, Hao, Mu, Zhenkai, Dong, Hongrui, Wang, Haibo, Ren, Yanqiang, Sun, Liang, Zhang, Liang, Yuan, Xiaoguang
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10573253/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37834581
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ma16196445
_version_ 1785120420390764544
author Du, Kai
Dong, Li
Zhang, Hao
Mu, Zhenkai
Dong, Hongrui
Wang, Haibo
Ren, Yanqiang
Sun, Liang
Zhang, Liang
Yuan, Xiaoguang
author_facet Du, Kai
Dong, Li
Zhang, Hao
Mu, Zhenkai
Dong, Hongrui
Wang, Haibo
Ren, Yanqiang
Sun, Liang
Zhang, Liang
Yuan, Xiaoguang
author_sort Du, Kai
collection PubMed
description Sheet metals usually experience various loading paths such as uniaxial tension, uniaxial compression, biaxial tension, and simple shear during the forming process. However, the existing constitutive models cannot always accurately describe blanks’ anisotropic yield and plastic flow behavior of blanks under all typical stress states. Given this, this paper improves the Eyld2000-2d yield criterion by introducing hydrostatic pressure to the A-Eyld2000-2d yield criterion that can describe the strength differential effect of materials. Meanwhile, to control the curvature of the yield surface more effectively, the near-plane strain yield stresses were added in the parameter identification process to calibrate the exponent m, so that the exponent is no longer considered as a constant value. Taking the widely used AA6016-T4, AA5754-O, DP980, and QP980 blanks in the automotive stamping industry as an example, the effectiveness of the new model and different parameter identification methods was verified by predicting experimental data under various simple and complex loading paths. Subsequently, the new model employing the optimal parameter identification strategy was compared with four widely used asymmetric yield criteria under associated and non-associated flow rules, including CPB06, LHY2013, S-Y2004, and Hu & Yoon2021, to further verify the accuracy of the proposed constitutive model. The results indicate that parameter identification strategy with variable exponent can significantly improve the flexibility of the yield criterion in describing the plastic anisotropy of blanks. Compared to the other yield criteria examined in this work, the new model provides the best prediction accuracy for the yield stresses and plastic flows of all blanks, especially in the near-plane strain and simple shear stress states. Modeling under the concept of anisotropic hardening can more accurately capture the evolving plastic behavior of blanks than isotropic hardening.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10573253
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-105732532023-10-14 Modeling of Eyld2000-2d Anisotropic Yield Criterion Considering Strength Differential Effect and Analysis of Optimal Calibration Strategy Du, Kai Dong, Li Zhang, Hao Mu, Zhenkai Dong, Hongrui Wang, Haibo Ren, Yanqiang Sun, Liang Zhang, Liang Yuan, Xiaoguang Materials (Basel) Article Sheet metals usually experience various loading paths such as uniaxial tension, uniaxial compression, biaxial tension, and simple shear during the forming process. However, the existing constitutive models cannot always accurately describe blanks’ anisotropic yield and plastic flow behavior of blanks under all typical stress states. Given this, this paper improves the Eyld2000-2d yield criterion by introducing hydrostatic pressure to the A-Eyld2000-2d yield criterion that can describe the strength differential effect of materials. Meanwhile, to control the curvature of the yield surface more effectively, the near-plane strain yield stresses were added in the parameter identification process to calibrate the exponent m, so that the exponent is no longer considered as a constant value. Taking the widely used AA6016-T4, AA5754-O, DP980, and QP980 blanks in the automotive stamping industry as an example, the effectiveness of the new model and different parameter identification methods was verified by predicting experimental data under various simple and complex loading paths. Subsequently, the new model employing the optimal parameter identification strategy was compared with four widely used asymmetric yield criteria under associated and non-associated flow rules, including CPB06, LHY2013, S-Y2004, and Hu & Yoon2021, to further verify the accuracy of the proposed constitutive model. The results indicate that parameter identification strategy with variable exponent can significantly improve the flexibility of the yield criterion in describing the plastic anisotropy of blanks. Compared to the other yield criteria examined in this work, the new model provides the best prediction accuracy for the yield stresses and plastic flows of all blanks, especially in the near-plane strain and simple shear stress states. Modeling under the concept of anisotropic hardening can more accurately capture the evolving plastic behavior of blanks than isotropic hardening. MDPI 2023-09-27 /pmc/articles/PMC10573253/ /pubmed/37834581 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ma16196445 Text en © 2023 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Du, Kai
Dong, Li
Zhang, Hao
Mu, Zhenkai
Dong, Hongrui
Wang, Haibo
Ren, Yanqiang
Sun, Liang
Zhang, Liang
Yuan, Xiaoguang
Modeling of Eyld2000-2d Anisotropic Yield Criterion Considering Strength Differential Effect and Analysis of Optimal Calibration Strategy
title Modeling of Eyld2000-2d Anisotropic Yield Criterion Considering Strength Differential Effect and Analysis of Optimal Calibration Strategy
title_full Modeling of Eyld2000-2d Anisotropic Yield Criterion Considering Strength Differential Effect and Analysis of Optimal Calibration Strategy
title_fullStr Modeling of Eyld2000-2d Anisotropic Yield Criterion Considering Strength Differential Effect and Analysis of Optimal Calibration Strategy
title_full_unstemmed Modeling of Eyld2000-2d Anisotropic Yield Criterion Considering Strength Differential Effect and Analysis of Optimal Calibration Strategy
title_short Modeling of Eyld2000-2d Anisotropic Yield Criterion Considering Strength Differential Effect and Analysis of Optimal Calibration Strategy
title_sort modeling of eyld2000-2d anisotropic yield criterion considering strength differential effect and analysis of optimal calibration strategy
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10573253/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37834581
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ma16196445
work_keys_str_mv AT dukai modelingofeyld20002danisotropicyieldcriterionconsideringstrengthdifferentialeffectandanalysisofoptimalcalibrationstrategy
AT dongli modelingofeyld20002danisotropicyieldcriterionconsideringstrengthdifferentialeffectandanalysisofoptimalcalibrationstrategy
AT zhanghao modelingofeyld20002danisotropicyieldcriterionconsideringstrengthdifferentialeffectandanalysisofoptimalcalibrationstrategy
AT muzhenkai modelingofeyld20002danisotropicyieldcriterionconsideringstrengthdifferentialeffectandanalysisofoptimalcalibrationstrategy
AT donghongrui modelingofeyld20002danisotropicyieldcriterionconsideringstrengthdifferentialeffectandanalysisofoptimalcalibrationstrategy
AT wanghaibo modelingofeyld20002danisotropicyieldcriterionconsideringstrengthdifferentialeffectandanalysisofoptimalcalibrationstrategy
AT renyanqiang modelingofeyld20002danisotropicyieldcriterionconsideringstrengthdifferentialeffectandanalysisofoptimalcalibrationstrategy
AT sunliang modelingofeyld20002danisotropicyieldcriterionconsideringstrengthdifferentialeffectandanalysisofoptimalcalibrationstrategy
AT zhangliang modelingofeyld20002danisotropicyieldcriterionconsideringstrengthdifferentialeffectandanalysisofoptimalcalibrationstrategy
AT yuanxiaoguang modelingofeyld20002danisotropicyieldcriterionconsideringstrengthdifferentialeffectandanalysisofoptimalcalibrationstrategy