Cargando…
Effects of Nanosecond Pulsed Electric Field (nsPEF) on a Multicellular Spheroid Tumor Model: Influence of Pulse Duration, Pulse Repetition Rate, Absorbed Energy, and Temperature
Cellular response upon nsPEF exposure depends on different parameters, such as pulse number and duration, the intensity of the electric field, pulse repetition rate (PRR), pulsing buffer composition, absorbed energy, and local temperature increase. Therefore, a deep insight into the impact of such p...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10573334/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37834447 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijms241914999 |
_version_ | 1785120437870526464 |
---|---|
author | Orlacchio, Rosa Kolosnjaj-Tabi, Jelena Mattei, Nicolas Lévêque, Philippe Rols, Marie Pierre Arnaud-Cormos, Delia Golzio, Muriel |
author_facet | Orlacchio, Rosa Kolosnjaj-Tabi, Jelena Mattei, Nicolas Lévêque, Philippe Rols, Marie Pierre Arnaud-Cormos, Delia Golzio, Muriel |
author_sort | Orlacchio, Rosa |
collection | PubMed |
description | Cellular response upon nsPEF exposure depends on different parameters, such as pulse number and duration, the intensity of the electric field, pulse repetition rate (PRR), pulsing buffer composition, absorbed energy, and local temperature increase. Therefore, a deep insight into the impact of such parameters on cellular response is paramount to adaptively optimize nsPEF treatment. Herein, we examined the effects of nsPEF ≤ 10 ns on long-term cellular viability and growth as a function of pulse duration (2–10 ns), PRR (20 and 200 Hz), cumulative time duration (1–5 µs), and absorbed electrical energy density (up to 81 mJ/mm(3) in sucrose-containing low-conductivity buffer and up to 700 mJ/mm(3) in high-conductivity HBSS buffer). Our results show that the effectiveness of nsPEFs in ablating 3D-grown cancer cells depends on the medium to which the cells are exposed and the PRR. When a medium with low-conductivity is used, the pulses do not result in cell ablation. Conversely, when the same pulse parameters are applied in a high-conductivity HBSS buffer and high PRRs are applied, the local temperature rises and yields either cell sensitization to nsPEFs or thermal damage. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10573334 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-105733342023-10-14 Effects of Nanosecond Pulsed Electric Field (nsPEF) on a Multicellular Spheroid Tumor Model: Influence of Pulse Duration, Pulse Repetition Rate, Absorbed Energy, and Temperature Orlacchio, Rosa Kolosnjaj-Tabi, Jelena Mattei, Nicolas Lévêque, Philippe Rols, Marie Pierre Arnaud-Cormos, Delia Golzio, Muriel Int J Mol Sci Article Cellular response upon nsPEF exposure depends on different parameters, such as pulse number and duration, the intensity of the electric field, pulse repetition rate (PRR), pulsing buffer composition, absorbed energy, and local temperature increase. Therefore, a deep insight into the impact of such parameters on cellular response is paramount to adaptively optimize nsPEF treatment. Herein, we examined the effects of nsPEF ≤ 10 ns on long-term cellular viability and growth as a function of pulse duration (2–10 ns), PRR (20 and 200 Hz), cumulative time duration (1–5 µs), and absorbed electrical energy density (up to 81 mJ/mm(3) in sucrose-containing low-conductivity buffer and up to 700 mJ/mm(3) in high-conductivity HBSS buffer). Our results show that the effectiveness of nsPEFs in ablating 3D-grown cancer cells depends on the medium to which the cells are exposed and the PRR. When a medium with low-conductivity is used, the pulses do not result in cell ablation. Conversely, when the same pulse parameters are applied in a high-conductivity HBSS buffer and high PRRs are applied, the local temperature rises and yields either cell sensitization to nsPEFs or thermal damage. MDPI 2023-10-08 /pmc/articles/PMC10573334/ /pubmed/37834447 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijms241914999 Text en © 2023 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Orlacchio, Rosa Kolosnjaj-Tabi, Jelena Mattei, Nicolas Lévêque, Philippe Rols, Marie Pierre Arnaud-Cormos, Delia Golzio, Muriel Effects of Nanosecond Pulsed Electric Field (nsPEF) on a Multicellular Spheroid Tumor Model: Influence of Pulse Duration, Pulse Repetition Rate, Absorbed Energy, and Temperature |
title | Effects of Nanosecond Pulsed Electric Field (nsPEF) on a Multicellular Spheroid Tumor Model: Influence of Pulse Duration, Pulse Repetition Rate, Absorbed Energy, and Temperature |
title_full | Effects of Nanosecond Pulsed Electric Field (nsPEF) on a Multicellular Spheroid Tumor Model: Influence of Pulse Duration, Pulse Repetition Rate, Absorbed Energy, and Temperature |
title_fullStr | Effects of Nanosecond Pulsed Electric Field (nsPEF) on a Multicellular Spheroid Tumor Model: Influence of Pulse Duration, Pulse Repetition Rate, Absorbed Energy, and Temperature |
title_full_unstemmed | Effects of Nanosecond Pulsed Electric Field (nsPEF) on a Multicellular Spheroid Tumor Model: Influence of Pulse Duration, Pulse Repetition Rate, Absorbed Energy, and Temperature |
title_short | Effects of Nanosecond Pulsed Electric Field (nsPEF) on a Multicellular Spheroid Tumor Model: Influence of Pulse Duration, Pulse Repetition Rate, Absorbed Energy, and Temperature |
title_sort | effects of nanosecond pulsed electric field (nspef) on a multicellular spheroid tumor model: influence of pulse duration, pulse repetition rate, absorbed energy, and temperature |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10573334/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37834447 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijms241914999 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT orlacchiorosa effectsofnanosecondpulsedelectricfieldnspefonamulticellularspheroidtumormodelinfluenceofpulsedurationpulserepetitionrateabsorbedenergyandtemperature AT kolosnjajtabijelena effectsofnanosecondpulsedelectricfieldnspefonamulticellularspheroidtumormodelinfluenceofpulsedurationpulserepetitionrateabsorbedenergyandtemperature AT matteinicolas effectsofnanosecondpulsedelectricfieldnspefonamulticellularspheroidtumormodelinfluenceofpulsedurationpulserepetitionrateabsorbedenergyandtemperature AT levequephilippe effectsofnanosecondpulsedelectricfieldnspefonamulticellularspheroidtumormodelinfluenceofpulsedurationpulserepetitionrateabsorbedenergyandtemperature AT rolsmariepierre effectsofnanosecondpulsedelectricfieldnspefonamulticellularspheroidtumormodelinfluenceofpulsedurationpulserepetitionrateabsorbedenergyandtemperature AT arnaudcormosdelia effectsofnanosecondpulsedelectricfieldnspefonamulticellularspheroidtumormodelinfluenceofpulsedurationpulserepetitionrateabsorbedenergyandtemperature AT golziomuriel effectsofnanosecondpulsedelectricfieldnspefonamulticellularspheroidtumormodelinfluenceofpulsedurationpulserepetitionrateabsorbedenergyandtemperature |