Cargando…

Treatment of Vulvovaginal Laxity by Electroporation: The Jett Plasma Medical for Her II Study

Introduction: Vaginal laxity is a widespread and undertreated medical condition associated especially with vaginal parity. Aim: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of electroporation therapy treatment of vulvovaginal laxity by the Jett Plasma for Her II device. Methods: The Jett Plasma for Her II St...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Fait, Tomas, Baltazár, Tivadar, Bubenickova, Leona, Kestranek, Jan, Stepan, Martin, Muller, Miroslav, Turcan, Pavel
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10573526/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37834879
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm12196234
_version_ 1785120484587732992
author Fait, Tomas
Baltazár, Tivadar
Bubenickova, Leona
Kestranek, Jan
Stepan, Martin
Muller, Miroslav
Turcan, Pavel
author_facet Fait, Tomas
Baltazár, Tivadar
Bubenickova, Leona
Kestranek, Jan
Stepan, Martin
Muller, Miroslav
Turcan, Pavel
author_sort Fait, Tomas
collection PubMed
description Introduction: Vaginal laxity is a widespread and undertreated medical condition associated especially with vaginal parity. Aim: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of electroporation therapy treatment of vulvovaginal laxity by the Jett Plasma for Her II device. Methods: The Jett Plasma for Her II Study is a multicentric, prospective, randomized, single-blinded, and controlled study. Women presenting with vaginal laxity were randomized to receive electroporation therapy delivered to the vaginal tissue (active—82 patients) vs. therapy with zero intensity (placebo—9 patients). Results: A total of 91 subjects whose average age was 48.69 ± 10.89 were included. Due to the results of a one-way analysis of variance, it may be concluded that in the case of the vaginal laxity questionnaire (VLQ), there is a statistically significant difference between actively treated patients and the placebo group (F(1,574) = 46.91; p < 0.001). In the case of the female sexual function index (FSFI), a one-way ANOVA test also showed a statistically significant difference between the actively treated patients and the placebo group (F(1,278) = 7.97; p = 0.005). In the case of the incontinence impact questionnaire-7 (IIQ-7), a one-way ANOVA test showed a statistically significant difference between the actively treated patients and the placebo group (F(1,384) = 15.51; p < 0.001). It confirms that improvement of vaginal laxity is conjoined with benefits in symptoms of urinary incontinence. Biopsy performed after the end of the treatment shows an increase in the vaginal mucosa thickness by an average of 100.04% in the active group. The treatment was well tolerated with no adverse events. No topical anesthetics were required. Conclusions: Treatments of vulvovaginal laxity by electroporation therapy achieved significant and sustainable 12-month effectiveness. Responses to the questionnaires also suggest subjective improvement in self-reported sexual function, incontinence, sexual satisfaction, and urogenital distress.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10573526
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-105735262023-10-14 Treatment of Vulvovaginal Laxity by Electroporation: The Jett Plasma Medical for Her II Study Fait, Tomas Baltazár, Tivadar Bubenickova, Leona Kestranek, Jan Stepan, Martin Muller, Miroslav Turcan, Pavel J Clin Med Article Introduction: Vaginal laxity is a widespread and undertreated medical condition associated especially with vaginal parity. Aim: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of electroporation therapy treatment of vulvovaginal laxity by the Jett Plasma for Her II device. Methods: The Jett Plasma for Her II Study is a multicentric, prospective, randomized, single-blinded, and controlled study. Women presenting with vaginal laxity were randomized to receive electroporation therapy delivered to the vaginal tissue (active—82 patients) vs. therapy with zero intensity (placebo—9 patients). Results: A total of 91 subjects whose average age was 48.69 ± 10.89 were included. Due to the results of a one-way analysis of variance, it may be concluded that in the case of the vaginal laxity questionnaire (VLQ), there is a statistically significant difference between actively treated patients and the placebo group (F(1,574) = 46.91; p < 0.001). In the case of the female sexual function index (FSFI), a one-way ANOVA test also showed a statistically significant difference between the actively treated patients and the placebo group (F(1,278) = 7.97; p = 0.005). In the case of the incontinence impact questionnaire-7 (IIQ-7), a one-way ANOVA test showed a statistically significant difference between the actively treated patients and the placebo group (F(1,384) = 15.51; p < 0.001). It confirms that improvement of vaginal laxity is conjoined with benefits in symptoms of urinary incontinence. Biopsy performed after the end of the treatment shows an increase in the vaginal mucosa thickness by an average of 100.04% in the active group. The treatment was well tolerated with no adverse events. No topical anesthetics were required. Conclusions: Treatments of vulvovaginal laxity by electroporation therapy achieved significant and sustainable 12-month effectiveness. Responses to the questionnaires also suggest subjective improvement in self-reported sexual function, incontinence, sexual satisfaction, and urogenital distress. MDPI 2023-09-27 /pmc/articles/PMC10573526/ /pubmed/37834879 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm12196234 Text en © 2023 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Fait, Tomas
Baltazár, Tivadar
Bubenickova, Leona
Kestranek, Jan
Stepan, Martin
Muller, Miroslav
Turcan, Pavel
Treatment of Vulvovaginal Laxity by Electroporation: The Jett Plasma Medical for Her II Study
title Treatment of Vulvovaginal Laxity by Electroporation: The Jett Plasma Medical for Her II Study
title_full Treatment of Vulvovaginal Laxity by Electroporation: The Jett Plasma Medical for Her II Study
title_fullStr Treatment of Vulvovaginal Laxity by Electroporation: The Jett Plasma Medical for Her II Study
title_full_unstemmed Treatment of Vulvovaginal Laxity by Electroporation: The Jett Plasma Medical for Her II Study
title_short Treatment of Vulvovaginal Laxity by Electroporation: The Jett Plasma Medical for Her II Study
title_sort treatment of vulvovaginal laxity by electroporation: the jett plasma medical for her ii study
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10573526/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37834879
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm12196234
work_keys_str_mv AT faittomas treatmentofvulvovaginallaxitybyelectroporationthejettplasmamedicalforheriistudy
AT baltazartivadar treatmentofvulvovaginallaxitybyelectroporationthejettplasmamedicalforheriistudy
AT bubenickovaleona treatmentofvulvovaginallaxitybyelectroporationthejettplasmamedicalforheriistudy
AT kestranekjan treatmentofvulvovaginallaxitybyelectroporationthejettplasmamedicalforheriistudy
AT stepanmartin treatmentofvulvovaginallaxitybyelectroporationthejettplasmamedicalforheriistudy
AT mullermiroslav treatmentofvulvovaginallaxitybyelectroporationthejettplasmamedicalforheriistudy
AT turcanpavel treatmentofvulvovaginallaxitybyelectroporationthejettplasmamedicalforheriistudy