Cargando…

From Model to Everyday Practice: A Qualitative Observational Study of Daily Fact Team Board Meetings

INTRODUCTION: The Flexible Assertive Community Treatment (FACT) model has rapidly become a way of organising services for people with severe mental illness. FACT describes the integrated approach of interprofessional teams. METHOD: A qualitative study of interprofessional collaboration in three FACT...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Myraunet, Ingunn, Strøm, Anita, Gjersøe, Heidi Moen
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Ubiquity Press 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10573559/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37842264
http://dx.doi.org/10.5334/ijic.7555
_version_ 1785120492434227200
author Myraunet, Ingunn
Strøm, Anita
Gjersøe, Heidi Moen
author_facet Myraunet, Ingunn
Strøm, Anita
Gjersøe, Heidi Moen
author_sort Myraunet, Ingunn
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: The Flexible Assertive Community Treatment (FACT) model has rapidly become a way of organising services for people with severe mental illness. FACT describes the integrated approach of interprofessional teams. METHOD: A qualitative study of interprofessional collaboration in three FACT teams was conducted. Thirty observations of the teams’ board meetings were conducted, and field notes were thematically analysed. RESULTS: This study generated three themes in interprofessional collaboration in FACT teams. The first theme reflects the challenges of working in line with the model, the second suggests an unclear understanding of a shared caseload, and the third shows different approaches to working with a shared caseload. DISCUSSION: The themes suggest that there is increased opportunity for the shared caseload in the FACT team board meeting. The findings reflect that there is a lack of either the resources necessary for working with a shared caseload or an understanding of the intention of a shared caseload. CONCLUSION: The potential of the shared caseload in FACT team board meetings are dependent on sufficient resources and a collective understanding of the FACT model and the shared caseload among professionals. Further research on how a shared caseload is experienced and facilitated in FACT teams can provide insight into their practices.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10573559
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Ubiquity Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-105735592023-10-14 From Model to Everyday Practice: A Qualitative Observational Study of Daily Fact Team Board Meetings Myraunet, Ingunn Strøm, Anita Gjersøe, Heidi Moen Int J Integr Care Research and Theory INTRODUCTION: The Flexible Assertive Community Treatment (FACT) model has rapidly become a way of organising services for people with severe mental illness. FACT describes the integrated approach of interprofessional teams. METHOD: A qualitative study of interprofessional collaboration in three FACT teams was conducted. Thirty observations of the teams’ board meetings were conducted, and field notes were thematically analysed. RESULTS: This study generated three themes in interprofessional collaboration in FACT teams. The first theme reflects the challenges of working in line with the model, the second suggests an unclear understanding of a shared caseload, and the third shows different approaches to working with a shared caseload. DISCUSSION: The themes suggest that there is increased opportunity for the shared caseload in the FACT team board meeting. The findings reflect that there is a lack of either the resources necessary for working with a shared caseload or an understanding of the intention of a shared caseload. CONCLUSION: The potential of the shared caseload in FACT team board meetings are dependent on sufficient resources and a collective understanding of the FACT model and the shared caseload among professionals. Further research on how a shared caseload is experienced and facilitated in FACT teams can provide insight into their practices. Ubiquity Press 2023-10-10 /pmc/articles/PMC10573559/ /pubmed/37842264 http://dx.doi.org/10.5334/ijic.7555 Text en Copyright: © 2023 The Author(s) https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC-BY 4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. See http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
spellingShingle Research and Theory
Myraunet, Ingunn
Strøm, Anita
Gjersøe, Heidi Moen
From Model to Everyday Practice: A Qualitative Observational Study of Daily Fact Team Board Meetings
title From Model to Everyday Practice: A Qualitative Observational Study of Daily Fact Team Board Meetings
title_full From Model to Everyday Practice: A Qualitative Observational Study of Daily Fact Team Board Meetings
title_fullStr From Model to Everyday Practice: A Qualitative Observational Study of Daily Fact Team Board Meetings
title_full_unstemmed From Model to Everyday Practice: A Qualitative Observational Study of Daily Fact Team Board Meetings
title_short From Model to Everyday Practice: A Qualitative Observational Study of Daily Fact Team Board Meetings
title_sort from model to everyday practice: a qualitative observational study of daily fact team board meetings
topic Research and Theory
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10573559/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37842264
http://dx.doi.org/10.5334/ijic.7555
work_keys_str_mv AT myraunetingunn frommodeltoeverydaypracticeaqualitativeobservationalstudyofdailyfactteamboardmeetings
AT strømanita frommodeltoeverydaypracticeaqualitativeobservationalstudyofdailyfactteamboardmeetings
AT gjersøeheidimoen frommodeltoeverydaypracticeaqualitativeobservationalstudyofdailyfactteamboardmeetings