Cargando…
Comparative Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) of Porous Asphalt Mixtures with Sustainable and Recycled Materials: A Cradle-to-Gate Approach
The road and construction sectors consume a large number of natural resources and energy, contributing significantly to waste generation and greenhouse gas emissions (GHG). The use of recycled aggregate from construction and demolition waste as a substitute for virgin aggregate is a current practice...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10573699/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37834679 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ma16196540 |
_version_ | 1785120525127778304 |
---|---|
author | De Pascale, Beatrice Tataranni, Piergiorgio Bonoli, Alessandra Lantieri, Claudio |
author_facet | De Pascale, Beatrice Tataranni, Piergiorgio Bonoli, Alessandra Lantieri, Claudio |
author_sort | De Pascale, Beatrice |
collection | PubMed |
description | The road and construction sectors consume a large number of natural resources and energy, contributing significantly to waste generation and greenhouse gas emissions (GHG). The use of recycled aggregate from construction and demolition waste as a substitute for virgin aggregate is a current practice in the construction of new road sections. Additionally, in recent years, there has been an increasing focus on finding alternatives to bitumen for binders used in asphalt mixes. This study investigates and compares the impacts associated with two porous asphalt mixtures produced with CDW aggregates, virgin aggregates, and a polyolefin-based synthetic transparent binder through an LCA methodology. A cradle-to-gate approach was employed. Model characterization for calculating the potential environmental impacts of each porous asphalt mixture was performed using the ReCipe 2016 assessment method at the midpoint and endpoint levels. The results are presented with reference to a baseline scenario corresponding to a porous asphalt mixture, confirming the benefits associated with the use of recycled aggregates and in some cases the benefits of not using bitumen-based binders. This work contributes to the understanding of the importance of choosing the least environmentally damaging solution during the production or rehabilitation of road pavement infrastructure. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10573699 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-105736992023-10-14 Comparative Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) of Porous Asphalt Mixtures with Sustainable and Recycled Materials: A Cradle-to-Gate Approach De Pascale, Beatrice Tataranni, Piergiorgio Bonoli, Alessandra Lantieri, Claudio Materials (Basel) Article The road and construction sectors consume a large number of natural resources and energy, contributing significantly to waste generation and greenhouse gas emissions (GHG). The use of recycled aggregate from construction and demolition waste as a substitute for virgin aggregate is a current practice in the construction of new road sections. Additionally, in recent years, there has been an increasing focus on finding alternatives to bitumen for binders used in asphalt mixes. This study investigates and compares the impacts associated with two porous asphalt mixtures produced with CDW aggregates, virgin aggregates, and a polyolefin-based synthetic transparent binder through an LCA methodology. A cradle-to-gate approach was employed. Model characterization for calculating the potential environmental impacts of each porous asphalt mixture was performed using the ReCipe 2016 assessment method at the midpoint and endpoint levels. The results are presented with reference to a baseline scenario corresponding to a porous asphalt mixture, confirming the benefits associated with the use of recycled aggregates and in some cases the benefits of not using bitumen-based binders. This work contributes to the understanding of the importance of choosing the least environmentally damaging solution during the production or rehabilitation of road pavement infrastructure. MDPI 2023-10-03 /pmc/articles/PMC10573699/ /pubmed/37834679 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ma16196540 Text en © 2023 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article De Pascale, Beatrice Tataranni, Piergiorgio Bonoli, Alessandra Lantieri, Claudio Comparative Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) of Porous Asphalt Mixtures with Sustainable and Recycled Materials: A Cradle-to-Gate Approach |
title | Comparative Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) of Porous Asphalt Mixtures with Sustainable and Recycled Materials: A Cradle-to-Gate Approach |
title_full | Comparative Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) of Porous Asphalt Mixtures with Sustainable and Recycled Materials: A Cradle-to-Gate Approach |
title_fullStr | Comparative Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) of Porous Asphalt Mixtures with Sustainable and Recycled Materials: A Cradle-to-Gate Approach |
title_full_unstemmed | Comparative Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) of Porous Asphalt Mixtures with Sustainable and Recycled Materials: A Cradle-to-Gate Approach |
title_short | Comparative Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) of Porous Asphalt Mixtures with Sustainable and Recycled Materials: A Cradle-to-Gate Approach |
title_sort | comparative life cycle assessment (lca) of porous asphalt mixtures with sustainable and recycled materials: a cradle-to-gate approach |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10573699/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37834679 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ma16196540 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT depascalebeatrice comparativelifecycleassessmentlcaofporousasphaltmixtureswithsustainableandrecycledmaterialsacradletogateapproach AT tatarannipiergiorgio comparativelifecycleassessmentlcaofporousasphaltmixtureswithsustainableandrecycledmaterialsacradletogateapproach AT bonolialessandra comparativelifecycleassessmentlcaofporousasphaltmixtureswithsustainableandrecycledmaterialsacradletogateapproach AT lantiericlaudio comparativelifecycleassessmentlcaofporousasphaltmixtureswithsustainableandrecycledmaterialsacradletogateapproach |