Cargando…
Conduction System Pacing versus Conventional Biventricular Pacing for Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy: Where Are We Heading?
Over the last few years, pacing of the conduction system (CSP) has emerged as the new standard pacing modality for bradycardia indications, allowing a more physiological ventricular activation compared to conventional right ventricular pacing. CSP has also emerged as an alternative modality to conve...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10573781/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37834932 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm12196288 |
_version_ | 1785120540597420032 |
---|---|
author | Domenichini, Giulia Le Bloa, Mathieu Teres Castillo, Cheryl Graf, Denis Carroz, Patrice Ascione, Ciro Porretta, Alessandra Pia Pascale, Patrizio Pruvot, Etienne |
author_facet | Domenichini, Giulia Le Bloa, Mathieu Teres Castillo, Cheryl Graf, Denis Carroz, Patrice Ascione, Ciro Porretta, Alessandra Pia Pascale, Patrizio Pruvot, Etienne |
author_sort | Domenichini, Giulia |
collection | PubMed |
description | Over the last few years, pacing of the conduction system (CSP) has emerged as the new standard pacing modality for bradycardia indications, allowing a more physiological ventricular activation compared to conventional right ventricular pacing. CSP has also emerged as an alternative modality to conventional biventricular pacing for the delivery of cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) in heart failure patients. However, if the initial clinical data seem to support this new physiological-based approach to CRT, the lack of large randomized studies confirming these preliminary results prevents CSP from being used routinely in clinical practice. Furthermore, concerns are still present regarding the long-term performance of pacing leads when employed for CSP, as well as their extractability. In this review article, we provide the state-of-the-art of CSP as an alternative to biventricular pacing for CRT delivery in heart failure patients. In particular, we describe the physiological concepts supporting this approach and we discuss the future perspectives of CSP in this context according to the implant techniques (His bundle pacing and left bundle branch area pacing) and the clinical data published so far. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10573781 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-105737812023-10-14 Conduction System Pacing versus Conventional Biventricular Pacing for Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy: Where Are We Heading? Domenichini, Giulia Le Bloa, Mathieu Teres Castillo, Cheryl Graf, Denis Carroz, Patrice Ascione, Ciro Porretta, Alessandra Pia Pascale, Patrizio Pruvot, Etienne J Clin Med Review Over the last few years, pacing of the conduction system (CSP) has emerged as the new standard pacing modality for bradycardia indications, allowing a more physiological ventricular activation compared to conventional right ventricular pacing. CSP has also emerged as an alternative modality to conventional biventricular pacing for the delivery of cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) in heart failure patients. However, if the initial clinical data seem to support this new physiological-based approach to CRT, the lack of large randomized studies confirming these preliminary results prevents CSP from being used routinely in clinical practice. Furthermore, concerns are still present regarding the long-term performance of pacing leads when employed for CSP, as well as their extractability. In this review article, we provide the state-of-the-art of CSP as an alternative to biventricular pacing for CRT delivery in heart failure patients. In particular, we describe the physiological concepts supporting this approach and we discuss the future perspectives of CSP in this context according to the implant techniques (His bundle pacing and left bundle branch area pacing) and the clinical data published so far. MDPI 2023-09-29 /pmc/articles/PMC10573781/ /pubmed/37834932 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm12196288 Text en © 2023 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Review Domenichini, Giulia Le Bloa, Mathieu Teres Castillo, Cheryl Graf, Denis Carroz, Patrice Ascione, Ciro Porretta, Alessandra Pia Pascale, Patrizio Pruvot, Etienne Conduction System Pacing versus Conventional Biventricular Pacing for Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy: Where Are We Heading? |
title | Conduction System Pacing versus Conventional Biventricular Pacing for Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy: Where Are We Heading? |
title_full | Conduction System Pacing versus Conventional Biventricular Pacing for Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy: Where Are We Heading? |
title_fullStr | Conduction System Pacing versus Conventional Biventricular Pacing for Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy: Where Are We Heading? |
title_full_unstemmed | Conduction System Pacing versus Conventional Biventricular Pacing for Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy: Where Are We Heading? |
title_short | Conduction System Pacing versus Conventional Biventricular Pacing for Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy: Where Are We Heading? |
title_sort | conduction system pacing versus conventional biventricular pacing for cardiac resynchronization therapy: where are we heading? |
topic | Review |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10573781/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37834932 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm12196288 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT domenichinigiulia conductionsystempacingversusconventionalbiventricularpacingforcardiacresynchronizationtherapywhereareweheading AT lebloamathieu conductionsystempacingversusconventionalbiventricularpacingforcardiacresynchronizationtherapywhereareweheading AT terescastillocheryl conductionsystempacingversusconventionalbiventricularpacingforcardiacresynchronizationtherapywhereareweheading AT grafdenis conductionsystempacingversusconventionalbiventricularpacingforcardiacresynchronizationtherapywhereareweheading AT carrozpatrice conductionsystempacingversusconventionalbiventricularpacingforcardiacresynchronizationtherapywhereareweheading AT ascioneciro conductionsystempacingversusconventionalbiventricularpacingforcardiacresynchronizationtherapywhereareweheading AT porrettaalessandrapia conductionsystempacingversusconventionalbiventricularpacingforcardiacresynchronizationtherapywhereareweheading AT pascalepatrizio conductionsystempacingversusconventionalbiventricularpacingforcardiacresynchronizationtherapywhereareweheading AT pruvotetienne conductionsystempacingversusconventionalbiventricularpacingforcardiacresynchronizationtherapywhereareweheading |