Cargando…

Conduction System Pacing versus Conventional Biventricular Pacing for Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy: Where Are We Heading?

Over the last few years, pacing of the conduction system (CSP) has emerged as the new standard pacing modality for bradycardia indications, allowing a more physiological ventricular activation compared to conventional right ventricular pacing. CSP has also emerged as an alternative modality to conve...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Domenichini, Giulia, Le Bloa, Mathieu, Teres Castillo, Cheryl, Graf, Denis, Carroz, Patrice, Ascione, Ciro, Porretta, Alessandra Pia, Pascale, Patrizio, Pruvot, Etienne
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10573781/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37834932
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm12196288
_version_ 1785120540597420032
author Domenichini, Giulia
Le Bloa, Mathieu
Teres Castillo, Cheryl
Graf, Denis
Carroz, Patrice
Ascione, Ciro
Porretta, Alessandra Pia
Pascale, Patrizio
Pruvot, Etienne
author_facet Domenichini, Giulia
Le Bloa, Mathieu
Teres Castillo, Cheryl
Graf, Denis
Carroz, Patrice
Ascione, Ciro
Porretta, Alessandra Pia
Pascale, Patrizio
Pruvot, Etienne
author_sort Domenichini, Giulia
collection PubMed
description Over the last few years, pacing of the conduction system (CSP) has emerged as the new standard pacing modality for bradycardia indications, allowing a more physiological ventricular activation compared to conventional right ventricular pacing. CSP has also emerged as an alternative modality to conventional biventricular pacing for the delivery of cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) in heart failure patients. However, if the initial clinical data seem to support this new physiological-based approach to CRT, the lack of large randomized studies confirming these preliminary results prevents CSP from being used routinely in clinical practice. Furthermore, concerns are still present regarding the long-term performance of pacing leads when employed for CSP, as well as their extractability. In this review article, we provide the state-of-the-art of CSP as an alternative to biventricular pacing for CRT delivery in heart failure patients. In particular, we describe the physiological concepts supporting this approach and we discuss the future perspectives of CSP in this context according to the implant techniques (His bundle pacing and left bundle branch area pacing) and the clinical data published so far.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10573781
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-105737812023-10-14 Conduction System Pacing versus Conventional Biventricular Pacing for Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy: Where Are We Heading? Domenichini, Giulia Le Bloa, Mathieu Teres Castillo, Cheryl Graf, Denis Carroz, Patrice Ascione, Ciro Porretta, Alessandra Pia Pascale, Patrizio Pruvot, Etienne J Clin Med Review Over the last few years, pacing of the conduction system (CSP) has emerged as the new standard pacing modality for bradycardia indications, allowing a more physiological ventricular activation compared to conventional right ventricular pacing. CSP has also emerged as an alternative modality to conventional biventricular pacing for the delivery of cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) in heart failure patients. However, if the initial clinical data seem to support this new physiological-based approach to CRT, the lack of large randomized studies confirming these preliminary results prevents CSP from being used routinely in clinical practice. Furthermore, concerns are still present regarding the long-term performance of pacing leads when employed for CSP, as well as their extractability. In this review article, we provide the state-of-the-art of CSP as an alternative to biventricular pacing for CRT delivery in heart failure patients. In particular, we describe the physiological concepts supporting this approach and we discuss the future perspectives of CSP in this context according to the implant techniques (His bundle pacing and left bundle branch area pacing) and the clinical data published so far. MDPI 2023-09-29 /pmc/articles/PMC10573781/ /pubmed/37834932 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm12196288 Text en © 2023 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Review
Domenichini, Giulia
Le Bloa, Mathieu
Teres Castillo, Cheryl
Graf, Denis
Carroz, Patrice
Ascione, Ciro
Porretta, Alessandra Pia
Pascale, Patrizio
Pruvot, Etienne
Conduction System Pacing versus Conventional Biventricular Pacing for Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy: Where Are We Heading?
title Conduction System Pacing versus Conventional Biventricular Pacing for Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy: Where Are We Heading?
title_full Conduction System Pacing versus Conventional Biventricular Pacing for Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy: Where Are We Heading?
title_fullStr Conduction System Pacing versus Conventional Biventricular Pacing for Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy: Where Are We Heading?
title_full_unstemmed Conduction System Pacing versus Conventional Biventricular Pacing for Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy: Where Are We Heading?
title_short Conduction System Pacing versus Conventional Biventricular Pacing for Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy: Where Are We Heading?
title_sort conduction system pacing versus conventional biventricular pacing for cardiac resynchronization therapy: where are we heading?
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10573781/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37834932
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm12196288
work_keys_str_mv AT domenichinigiulia conductionsystempacingversusconventionalbiventricularpacingforcardiacresynchronizationtherapywhereareweheading
AT lebloamathieu conductionsystempacingversusconventionalbiventricularpacingforcardiacresynchronizationtherapywhereareweheading
AT terescastillocheryl conductionsystempacingversusconventionalbiventricularpacingforcardiacresynchronizationtherapywhereareweheading
AT grafdenis conductionsystempacingversusconventionalbiventricularpacingforcardiacresynchronizationtherapywhereareweheading
AT carrozpatrice conductionsystempacingversusconventionalbiventricularpacingforcardiacresynchronizationtherapywhereareweheading
AT ascioneciro conductionsystempacingversusconventionalbiventricularpacingforcardiacresynchronizationtherapywhereareweheading
AT porrettaalessandrapia conductionsystempacingversusconventionalbiventricularpacingforcardiacresynchronizationtherapywhereareweheading
AT pascalepatrizio conductionsystempacingversusconventionalbiventricularpacingforcardiacresynchronizationtherapywhereareweheading
AT pruvotetienne conductionsystempacingversusconventionalbiventricularpacingforcardiacresynchronizationtherapywhereareweheading