Cargando…

Evaluation of Clinical Outcomes after Poor-Quality Embryo Transfer and Prognostic Parameters

We aimed to investigate the clinical results following poor-quality embryo transfer and the parameters to foresee the prognosis. In this study, 2123 cycles that had day 3 and day 5 single-fresh embryo with poor-quality embryo transfers and good-quality embryo transfers were compared. The cycles acco...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kadioglu, Nezaket, Kahyaoğlu, İnci, Kaplanoğlu, İskender, Dilbaz, Serdar, Engin Üstün, Yaprak
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10573848/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37834880
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm12196236
_version_ 1785120556308234240
author Kadioglu, Nezaket
Kahyaoğlu, İnci
Kaplanoğlu, İskender
Dilbaz, Serdar
Engin Üstün, Yaprak
author_facet Kadioglu, Nezaket
Kahyaoğlu, İnci
Kaplanoğlu, İskender
Dilbaz, Serdar
Engin Üstün, Yaprak
author_sort Kadioglu, Nezaket
collection PubMed
description We aimed to investigate the clinical results following poor-quality embryo transfer and the parameters to foresee the prognosis. In this study, 2123 cycles that had day 3 and day 5 single-fresh embryo with poor-quality embryo transfers and good-quality embryo transfers were compared. The cycles according to transfer day were evaluated by conducting a subgroup analysis. The correlation between all the obtained demographic characteristics, controlled ovarian stimulation parameters, and cycle results were analysed. Clinical pregnancy was established in 53 patients that underwent transfer in the poor-quality embryo group (14.9%). Of these patients, 36 had live birth (live birth rate per clinical pregnancy 67.9%). In cleavage-stage embryos, live birth rates per clinical pregnancy were higher in poor-quality blastocyst transfer. When analysing the factors affecting live births in the poor-quality embryo group, as the total gonadotropin dose increases, the probability of live birth decreases, as in the probability of hCG positivity. In conclusion, although the probability of pregnancy is low, when clinical pregnancy is established, there is a high chance of having a live birth after poor-quality embryo transfers. This could be regarded as an acceptable option in cycles when only poor-quality embryos are available.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10573848
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-105738482023-10-14 Evaluation of Clinical Outcomes after Poor-Quality Embryo Transfer and Prognostic Parameters Kadioglu, Nezaket Kahyaoğlu, İnci Kaplanoğlu, İskender Dilbaz, Serdar Engin Üstün, Yaprak J Clin Med Article We aimed to investigate the clinical results following poor-quality embryo transfer and the parameters to foresee the prognosis. In this study, 2123 cycles that had day 3 and day 5 single-fresh embryo with poor-quality embryo transfers and good-quality embryo transfers were compared. The cycles according to transfer day were evaluated by conducting a subgroup analysis. The correlation between all the obtained demographic characteristics, controlled ovarian stimulation parameters, and cycle results were analysed. Clinical pregnancy was established in 53 patients that underwent transfer in the poor-quality embryo group (14.9%). Of these patients, 36 had live birth (live birth rate per clinical pregnancy 67.9%). In cleavage-stage embryos, live birth rates per clinical pregnancy were higher in poor-quality blastocyst transfer. When analysing the factors affecting live births in the poor-quality embryo group, as the total gonadotropin dose increases, the probability of live birth decreases, as in the probability of hCG positivity. In conclusion, although the probability of pregnancy is low, when clinical pregnancy is established, there is a high chance of having a live birth after poor-quality embryo transfers. This could be regarded as an acceptable option in cycles when only poor-quality embryos are available. MDPI 2023-09-27 /pmc/articles/PMC10573848/ /pubmed/37834880 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm12196236 Text en © 2023 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Kadioglu, Nezaket
Kahyaoğlu, İnci
Kaplanoğlu, İskender
Dilbaz, Serdar
Engin Üstün, Yaprak
Evaluation of Clinical Outcomes after Poor-Quality Embryo Transfer and Prognostic Parameters
title Evaluation of Clinical Outcomes after Poor-Quality Embryo Transfer and Prognostic Parameters
title_full Evaluation of Clinical Outcomes after Poor-Quality Embryo Transfer and Prognostic Parameters
title_fullStr Evaluation of Clinical Outcomes after Poor-Quality Embryo Transfer and Prognostic Parameters
title_full_unstemmed Evaluation of Clinical Outcomes after Poor-Quality Embryo Transfer and Prognostic Parameters
title_short Evaluation of Clinical Outcomes after Poor-Quality Embryo Transfer and Prognostic Parameters
title_sort evaluation of clinical outcomes after poor-quality embryo transfer and prognostic parameters
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10573848/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37834880
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm12196236
work_keys_str_mv AT kadioglunezaket evaluationofclinicaloutcomesafterpoorqualityembryotransferandprognosticparameters
AT kahyaogluinci evaluationofclinicaloutcomesafterpoorqualityembryotransferandprognosticparameters
AT kaplanogluiskender evaluationofclinicaloutcomesafterpoorqualityembryotransferandprognosticparameters
AT dilbazserdar evaluationofclinicaloutcomesafterpoorqualityembryotransferandprognosticparameters
AT enginustunyaprak evaluationofclinicaloutcomesafterpoorqualityembryotransferandprognosticparameters