Cargando…
Novel Three-Dimensional Body Scan Anthropometry versus MR-Pelvimetry for Vaginal Breech Delivery Assessment
In this prospective, monocentric study, we investigated the potency of a novel three-dimensional (3D) body scanner for external pelvic assessment in birth planning for intended vaginal breech delivery. Between April 2021 and June 2022, 73 singleton pregnancies with intended vaginal birth from breech...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10573905/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37834825 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm12196181 |
_version_ | 1785120569715326976 |
---|---|
author | Dathan-Stumpf, Anne Lia, Massimiliano Meigen, Christof Bornmann, Karoline Martin, Mireille Aßmann, Manuela Kiess, Wieland Stepan, Holger |
author_facet | Dathan-Stumpf, Anne Lia, Massimiliano Meigen, Christof Bornmann, Karoline Martin, Mireille Aßmann, Manuela Kiess, Wieland Stepan, Holger |
author_sort | Dathan-Stumpf, Anne |
collection | PubMed |
description | In this prospective, monocentric study, we investigated the potency of a novel three-dimensional (3D) body scanner for external pelvic assessment in birth planning for intended vaginal breech delivery. Between April 2021 and June 2022, 73 singleton pregnancies with intended vaginal birth from breech presentation (>36.0 weeks of gestation) were measured using a pelvimeter by Martin, a three-dimensional body scanner, and MR-pelvimetry. Measures were related to vaginal birth and intrapartum cesarean section. A total of 26 outer pelvic dimensions and 7 inner pelvic measurements were determined. The rate of successful vaginal breech delivery was 56.9%. The AUC (area under the curve) of the obstetric conjugate (OC) measured by MRI for predicting the primary outcome was 0.62 (OR 0.63; p = 0.22), adjusted for neonatal birth weight 0.66 (OR 0.60; p = 0.19). Of the 22 measured 3D body scanner values, the ratio of waist girth to maternal height showed the best prediction (AUC = 0.71; OR 1.27; p = 0.015). The best predictive pelvimeter value was the distantia spinarum with an AUC of 0.65 (OR = 0.80). The 3D body scanner technique is at least equal to predict successful vaginal breech delivery compared to MRI diagnostics. Further large-scale, prospective studies are needed to verify these results. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10573905 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-105739052023-10-14 Novel Three-Dimensional Body Scan Anthropometry versus MR-Pelvimetry for Vaginal Breech Delivery Assessment Dathan-Stumpf, Anne Lia, Massimiliano Meigen, Christof Bornmann, Karoline Martin, Mireille Aßmann, Manuela Kiess, Wieland Stepan, Holger J Clin Med Article In this prospective, monocentric study, we investigated the potency of a novel three-dimensional (3D) body scanner for external pelvic assessment in birth planning for intended vaginal breech delivery. Between April 2021 and June 2022, 73 singleton pregnancies with intended vaginal birth from breech presentation (>36.0 weeks of gestation) were measured using a pelvimeter by Martin, a three-dimensional body scanner, and MR-pelvimetry. Measures were related to vaginal birth and intrapartum cesarean section. A total of 26 outer pelvic dimensions and 7 inner pelvic measurements were determined. The rate of successful vaginal breech delivery was 56.9%. The AUC (area under the curve) of the obstetric conjugate (OC) measured by MRI for predicting the primary outcome was 0.62 (OR 0.63; p = 0.22), adjusted for neonatal birth weight 0.66 (OR 0.60; p = 0.19). Of the 22 measured 3D body scanner values, the ratio of waist girth to maternal height showed the best prediction (AUC = 0.71; OR 1.27; p = 0.015). The best predictive pelvimeter value was the distantia spinarum with an AUC of 0.65 (OR = 0.80). The 3D body scanner technique is at least equal to predict successful vaginal breech delivery compared to MRI diagnostics. Further large-scale, prospective studies are needed to verify these results. MDPI 2023-09-25 /pmc/articles/PMC10573905/ /pubmed/37834825 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm12196181 Text en © 2023 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Dathan-Stumpf, Anne Lia, Massimiliano Meigen, Christof Bornmann, Karoline Martin, Mireille Aßmann, Manuela Kiess, Wieland Stepan, Holger Novel Three-Dimensional Body Scan Anthropometry versus MR-Pelvimetry for Vaginal Breech Delivery Assessment |
title | Novel Three-Dimensional Body Scan Anthropometry versus MR-Pelvimetry for Vaginal Breech Delivery Assessment |
title_full | Novel Three-Dimensional Body Scan Anthropometry versus MR-Pelvimetry for Vaginal Breech Delivery Assessment |
title_fullStr | Novel Three-Dimensional Body Scan Anthropometry versus MR-Pelvimetry for Vaginal Breech Delivery Assessment |
title_full_unstemmed | Novel Three-Dimensional Body Scan Anthropometry versus MR-Pelvimetry for Vaginal Breech Delivery Assessment |
title_short | Novel Three-Dimensional Body Scan Anthropometry versus MR-Pelvimetry for Vaginal Breech Delivery Assessment |
title_sort | novel three-dimensional body scan anthropometry versus mr-pelvimetry for vaginal breech delivery assessment |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10573905/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37834825 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm12196181 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT dathanstumpfanne novelthreedimensionalbodyscananthropometryversusmrpelvimetryforvaginalbreechdeliveryassessment AT liamassimiliano novelthreedimensionalbodyscananthropometryversusmrpelvimetryforvaginalbreechdeliveryassessment AT meigenchristof novelthreedimensionalbodyscananthropometryversusmrpelvimetryforvaginalbreechdeliveryassessment AT bornmannkaroline novelthreedimensionalbodyscananthropometryversusmrpelvimetryforvaginalbreechdeliveryassessment AT martinmireille novelthreedimensionalbodyscananthropometryversusmrpelvimetryforvaginalbreechdeliveryassessment AT aßmannmanuela novelthreedimensionalbodyscananthropometryversusmrpelvimetryforvaginalbreechdeliveryassessment AT kiesswieland novelthreedimensionalbodyscananthropometryversusmrpelvimetryforvaginalbreechdeliveryassessment AT stepanholger novelthreedimensionalbodyscananthropometryversusmrpelvimetryforvaginalbreechdeliveryassessment |