Cargando…

Novel Three-Dimensional Body Scan Anthropometry versus MR-Pelvimetry for Vaginal Breech Delivery Assessment

In this prospective, monocentric study, we investigated the potency of a novel three-dimensional (3D) body scanner for external pelvic assessment in birth planning for intended vaginal breech delivery. Between April 2021 and June 2022, 73 singleton pregnancies with intended vaginal birth from breech...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Dathan-Stumpf, Anne, Lia, Massimiliano, Meigen, Christof, Bornmann, Karoline, Martin, Mireille, Aßmann, Manuela, Kiess, Wieland, Stepan, Holger
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10573905/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37834825
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm12196181
_version_ 1785120569715326976
author Dathan-Stumpf, Anne
Lia, Massimiliano
Meigen, Christof
Bornmann, Karoline
Martin, Mireille
Aßmann, Manuela
Kiess, Wieland
Stepan, Holger
author_facet Dathan-Stumpf, Anne
Lia, Massimiliano
Meigen, Christof
Bornmann, Karoline
Martin, Mireille
Aßmann, Manuela
Kiess, Wieland
Stepan, Holger
author_sort Dathan-Stumpf, Anne
collection PubMed
description In this prospective, monocentric study, we investigated the potency of a novel three-dimensional (3D) body scanner for external pelvic assessment in birth planning for intended vaginal breech delivery. Between April 2021 and June 2022, 73 singleton pregnancies with intended vaginal birth from breech presentation (>36.0 weeks of gestation) were measured using a pelvimeter by Martin, a three-dimensional body scanner, and MR-pelvimetry. Measures were related to vaginal birth and intrapartum cesarean section. A total of 26 outer pelvic dimensions and 7 inner pelvic measurements were determined. The rate of successful vaginal breech delivery was 56.9%. The AUC (area under the curve) of the obstetric conjugate (OC) measured by MRI for predicting the primary outcome was 0.62 (OR 0.63; p = 0.22), adjusted for neonatal birth weight 0.66 (OR 0.60; p = 0.19). Of the 22 measured 3D body scanner values, the ratio of waist girth to maternal height showed the best prediction (AUC = 0.71; OR 1.27; p = 0.015). The best predictive pelvimeter value was the distantia spinarum with an AUC of 0.65 (OR = 0.80). The 3D body scanner technique is at least equal to predict successful vaginal breech delivery compared to MRI diagnostics. Further large-scale, prospective studies are needed to verify these results.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10573905
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-105739052023-10-14 Novel Three-Dimensional Body Scan Anthropometry versus MR-Pelvimetry for Vaginal Breech Delivery Assessment Dathan-Stumpf, Anne Lia, Massimiliano Meigen, Christof Bornmann, Karoline Martin, Mireille Aßmann, Manuela Kiess, Wieland Stepan, Holger J Clin Med Article In this prospective, monocentric study, we investigated the potency of a novel three-dimensional (3D) body scanner for external pelvic assessment in birth planning for intended vaginal breech delivery. Between April 2021 and June 2022, 73 singleton pregnancies with intended vaginal birth from breech presentation (>36.0 weeks of gestation) were measured using a pelvimeter by Martin, a three-dimensional body scanner, and MR-pelvimetry. Measures were related to vaginal birth and intrapartum cesarean section. A total of 26 outer pelvic dimensions and 7 inner pelvic measurements were determined. The rate of successful vaginal breech delivery was 56.9%. The AUC (area under the curve) of the obstetric conjugate (OC) measured by MRI for predicting the primary outcome was 0.62 (OR 0.63; p = 0.22), adjusted for neonatal birth weight 0.66 (OR 0.60; p = 0.19). Of the 22 measured 3D body scanner values, the ratio of waist girth to maternal height showed the best prediction (AUC = 0.71; OR 1.27; p = 0.015). The best predictive pelvimeter value was the distantia spinarum with an AUC of 0.65 (OR = 0.80). The 3D body scanner technique is at least equal to predict successful vaginal breech delivery compared to MRI diagnostics. Further large-scale, prospective studies are needed to verify these results. MDPI 2023-09-25 /pmc/articles/PMC10573905/ /pubmed/37834825 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm12196181 Text en © 2023 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Dathan-Stumpf, Anne
Lia, Massimiliano
Meigen, Christof
Bornmann, Karoline
Martin, Mireille
Aßmann, Manuela
Kiess, Wieland
Stepan, Holger
Novel Three-Dimensional Body Scan Anthropometry versus MR-Pelvimetry for Vaginal Breech Delivery Assessment
title Novel Three-Dimensional Body Scan Anthropometry versus MR-Pelvimetry for Vaginal Breech Delivery Assessment
title_full Novel Three-Dimensional Body Scan Anthropometry versus MR-Pelvimetry for Vaginal Breech Delivery Assessment
title_fullStr Novel Three-Dimensional Body Scan Anthropometry versus MR-Pelvimetry for Vaginal Breech Delivery Assessment
title_full_unstemmed Novel Three-Dimensional Body Scan Anthropometry versus MR-Pelvimetry for Vaginal Breech Delivery Assessment
title_short Novel Three-Dimensional Body Scan Anthropometry versus MR-Pelvimetry for Vaginal Breech Delivery Assessment
title_sort novel three-dimensional body scan anthropometry versus mr-pelvimetry for vaginal breech delivery assessment
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10573905/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37834825
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm12196181
work_keys_str_mv AT dathanstumpfanne novelthreedimensionalbodyscananthropometryversusmrpelvimetryforvaginalbreechdeliveryassessment
AT liamassimiliano novelthreedimensionalbodyscananthropometryversusmrpelvimetryforvaginalbreechdeliveryassessment
AT meigenchristof novelthreedimensionalbodyscananthropometryversusmrpelvimetryforvaginalbreechdeliveryassessment
AT bornmannkaroline novelthreedimensionalbodyscananthropometryversusmrpelvimetryforvaginalbreechdeliveryassessment
AT martinmireille novelthreedimensionalbodyscananthropometryversusmrpelvimetryforvaginalbreechdeliveryassessment
AT aßmannmanuela novelthreedimensionalbodyscananthropometryversusmrpelvimetryforvaginalbreechdeliveryassessment
AT kiesswieland novelthreedimensionalbodyscananthropometryversusmrpelvimetryforvaginalbreechdeliveryassessment
AT stepanholger novelthreedimensionalbodyscananthropometryversusmrpelvimetryforvaginalbreechdeliveryassessment