Cargando…
An Optimization Method of Deep Transfer Learning for Vegetation Segmentation under Rainy and Dry Season Differences in a Dry Thermal Valley
Deep learning networks might require re-training for different datasets, consuming significant manual labeling and training time. Transfer learning uses little new data and training time to enable pre-trained network segmentation in relevant scenarios (e.g., different vegetation images in rainy and...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10574146/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37836123 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/plants12193383 |
_version_ | 1785120625990303744 |
---|---|
author | Chen, Yayong Zhou, Beibei Ye, Dapeng Cui, Lei Feng, Lei Han, Xiaojie |
author_facet | Chen, Yayong Zhou, Beibei Ye, Dapeng Cui, Lei Feng, Lei Han, Xiaojie |
author_sort | Chen, Yayong |
collection | PubMed |
description | Deep learning networks might require re-training for different datasets, consuming significant manual labeling and training time. Transfer learning uses little new data and training time to enable pre-trained network segmentation in relevant scenarios (e.g., different vegetation images in rainy and dry seasons); however, existing transfer learning methods lack systematicity and controllability. So, an MTPI method (Maximum Transfer Potential Index method) was proposed to find the optimal conditions in data and feature quantity for transfer learning (MTPI conditions) in this study. The four pre-trained deep networks (Seg-Net (Semantic Segmentation Networks), FCN (Fully Convolutional Networks), Mobile net v2, and Res-Net 50 (Residual Network)) using the rainy season dataset showed that Res-Net 50 had the best accuracy with 93.58% and an WIoU (weight Intersection over Union) of 88.14%, most worthy to transfer training in vegetation segmentation. By obtaining each layer’s TPI performance (Transfer Potential Index) of the pre-trained Res-Net 50, the MTPI method results show that the 1000-TDS and 37-TP were estimated as the best training speed with the smallest dataset and a small error risk. The MTPI transfer learning results show 91.56% accuracy and 84.86% WIoU with 90% new dataset reduction and 90% iteration reduction, which is informative for deep networks in segmentation tasks between complex vegetation scenes. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10574146 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-105741462023-10-14 An Optimization Method of Deep Transfer Learning for Vegetation Segmentation under Rainy and Dry Season Differences in a Dry Thermal Valley Chen, Yayong Zhou, Beibei Ye, Dapeng Cui, Lei Feng, Lei Han, Xiaojie Plants (Basel) Article Deep learning networks might require re-training for different datasets, consuming significant manual labeling and training time. Transfer learning uses little new data and training time to enable pre-trained network segmentation in relevant scenarios (e.g., different vegetation images in rainy and dry seasons); however, existing transfer learning methods lack systematicity and controllability. So, an MTPI method (Maximum Transfer Potential Index method) was proposed to find the optimal conditions in data and feature quantity for transfer learning (MTPI conditions) in this study. The four pre-trained deep networks (Seg-Net (Semantic Segmentation Networks), FCN (Fully Convolutional Networks), Mobile net v2, and Res-Net 50 (Residual Network)) using the rainy season dataset showed that Res-Net 50 had the best accuracy with 93.58% and an WIoU (weight Intersection over Union) of 88.14%, most worthy to transfer training in vegetation segmentation. By obtaining each layer’s TPI performance (Transfer Potential Index) of the pre-trained Res-Net 50, the MTPI method results show that the 1000-TDS and 37-TP were estimated as the best training speed with the smallest dataset and a small error risk. The MTPI transfer learning results show 91.56% accuracy and 84.86% WIoU with 90% new dataset reduction and 90% iteration reduction, which is informative for deep networks in segmentation tasks between complex vegetation scenes. MDPI 2023-09-25 /pmc/articles/PMC10574146/ /pubmed/37836123 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/plants12193383 Text en © 2023 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Chen, Yayong Zhou, Beibei Ye, Dapeng Cui, Lei Feng, Lei Han, Xiaojie An Optimization Method of Deep Transfer Learning for Vegetation Segmentation under Rainy and Dry Season Differences in a Dry Thermal Valley |
title | An Optimization Method of Deep Transfer Learning for Vegetation Segmentation under Rainy and Dry Season Differences in a Dry Thermal Valley |
title_full | An Optimization Method of Deep Transfer Learning for Vegetation Segmentation under Rainy and Dry Season Differences in a Dry Thermal Valley |
title_fullStr | An Optimization Method of Deep Transfer Learning for Vegetation Segmentation under Rainy and Dry Season Differences in a Dry Thermal Valley |
title_full_unstemmed | An Optimization Method of Deep Transfer Learning for Vegetation Segmentation under Rainy and Dry Season Differences in a Dry Thermal Valley |
title_short | An Optimization Method of Deep Transfer Learning for Vegetation Segmentation under Rainy and Dry Season Differences in a Dry Thermal Valley |
title_sort | optimization method of deep transfer learning for vegetation segmentation under rainy and dry season differences in a dry thermal valley |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10574146/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37836123 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/plants12193383 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT chenyayong anoptimizationmethodofdeeptransferlearningforvegetationsegmentationunderrainyanddryseasondifferencesinadrythermalvalley AT zhoubeibei anoptimizationmethodofdeeptransferlearningforvegetationsegmentationunderrainyanddryseasondifferencesinadrythermalvalley AT yedapeng anoptimizationmethodofdeeptransferlearningforvegetationsegmentationunderrainyanddryseasondifferencesinadrythermalvalley AT cuilei anoptimizationmethodofdeeptransferlearningforvegetationsegmentationunderrainyanddryseasondifferencesinadrythermalvalley AT fenglei anoptimizationmethodofdeeptransferlearningforvegetationsegmentationunderrainyanddryseasondifferencesinadrythermalvalley AT hanxiaojie anoptimizationmethodofdeeptransferlearningforvegetationsegmentationunderrainyanddryseasondifferencesinadrythermalvalley AT chenyayong optimizationmethodofdeeptransferlearningforvegetationsegmentationunderrainyanddryseasondifferencesinadrythermalvalley AT zhoubeibei optimizationmethodofdeeptransferlearningforvegetationsegmentationunderrainyanddryseasondifferencesinadrythermalvalley AT yedapeng optimizationmethodofdeeptransferlearningforvegetationsegmentationunderrainyanddryseasondifferencesinadrythermalvalley AT cuilei optimizationmethodofdeeptransferlearningforvegetationsegmentationunderrainyanddryseasondifferencesinadrythermalvalley AT fenglei optimizationmethodofdeeptransferlearningforvegetationsegmentationunderrainyanddryseasondifferencesinadrythermalvalley AT hanxiaojie optimizationmethodofdeeptransferlearningforvegetationsegmentationunderrainyanddryseasondifferencesinadrythermalvalley |