Cargando…

An Optimization Method of Deep Transfer Learning for Vegetation Segmentation under Rainy and Dry Season Differences in a Dry Thermal Valley

Deep learning networks might require re-training for different datasets, consuming significant manual labeling and training time. Transfer learning uses little new data and training time to enable pre-trained network segmentation in relevant scenarios (e.g., different vegetation images in rainy and...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Chen, Yayong, Zhou, Beibei, Ye, Dapeng, Cui, Lei, Feng, Lei, Han, Xiaojie
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10574146/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37836123
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/plants12193383
_version_ 1785120625990303744
author Chen, Yayong
Zhou, Beibei
Ye, Dapeng
Cui, Lei
Feng, Lei
Han, Xiaojie
author_facet Chen, Yayong
Zhou, Beibei
Ye, Dapeng
Cui, Lei
Feng, Lei
Han, Xiaojie
author_sort Chen, Yayong
collection PubMed
description Deep learning networks might require re-training for different datasets, consuming significant manual labeling and training time. Transfer learning uses little new data and training time to enable pre-trained network segmentation in relevant scenarios (e.g., different vegetation images in rainy and dry seasons); however, existing transfer learning methods lack systematicity and controllability. So, an MTPI method (Maximum Transfer Potential Index method) was proposed to find the optimal conditions in data and feature quantity for transfer learning (MTPI conditions) in this study. The four pre-trained deep networks (Seg-Net (Semantic Segmentation Networks), FCN (Fully Convolutional Networks), Mobile net v2, and Res-Net 50 (Residual Network)) using the rainy season dataset showed that Res-Net 50 had the best accuracy with 93.58% and an WIoU (weight Intersection over Union) of 88.14%, most worthy to transfer training in vegetation segmentation. By obtaining each layer’s TPI performance (Transfer Potential Index) of the pre-trained Res-Net 50, the MTPI method results show that the 1000-TDS and 37-TP were estimated as the best training speed with the smallest dataset and a small error risk. The MTPI transfer learning results show 91.56% accuracy and 84.86% WIoU with 90% new dataset reduction and 90% iteration reduction, which is informative for deep networks in segmentation tasks between complex vegetation scenes.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10574146
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-105741462023-10-14 An Optimization Method of Deep Transfer Learning for Vegetation Segmentation under Rainy and Dry Season Differences in a Dry Thermal Valley Chen, Yayong Zhou, Beibei Ye, Dapeng Cui, Lei Feng, Lei Han, Xiaojie Plants (Basel) Article Deep learning networks might require re-training for different datasets, consuming significant manual labeling and training time. Transfer learning uses little new data and training time to enable pre-trained network segmentation in relevant scenarios (e.g., different vegetation images in rainy and dry seasons); however, existing transfer learning methods lack systematicity and controllability. So, an MTPI method (Maximum Transfer Potential Index method) was proposed to find the optimal conditions in data and feature quantity for transfer learning (MTPI conditions) in this study. The four pre-trained deep networks (Seg-Net (Semantic Segmentation Networks), FCN (Fully Convolutional Networks), Mobile net v2, and Res-Net 50 (Residual Network)) using the rainy season dataset showed that Res-Net 50 had the best accuracy with 93.58% and an WIoU (weight Intersection over Union) of 88.14%, most worthy to transfer training in vegetation segmentation. By obtaining each layer’s TPI performance (Transfer Potential Index) of the pre-trained Res-Net 50, the MTPI method results show that the 1000-TDS and 37-TP were estimated as the best training speed with the smallest dataset and a small error risk. The MTPI transfer learning results show 91.56% accuracy and 84.86% WIoU with 90% new dataset reduction and 90% iteration reduction, which is informative for deep networks in segmentation tasks between complex vegetation scenes. MDPI 2023-09-25 /pmc/articles/PMC10574146/ /pubmed/37836123 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/plants12193383 Text en © 2023 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Chen, Yayong
Zhou, Beibei
Ye, Dapeng
Cui, Lei
Feng, Lei
Han, Xiaojie
An Optimization Method of Deep Transfer Learning for Vegetation Segmentation under Rainy and Dry Season Differences in a Dry Thermal Valley
title An Optimization Method of Deep Transfer Learning for Vegetation Segmentation under Rainy and Dry Season Differences in a Dry Thermal Valley
title_full An Optimization Method of Deep Transfer Learning for Vegetation Segmentation under Rainy and Dry Season Differences in a Dry Thermal Valley
title_fullStr An Optimization Method of Deep Transfer Learning for Vegetation Segmentation under Rainy and Dry Season Differences in a Dry Thermal Valley
title_full_unstemmed An Optimization Method of Deep Transfer Learning for Vegetation Segmentation under Rainy and Dry Season Differences in a Dry Thermal Valley
title_short An Optimization Method of Deep Transfer Learning for Vegetation Segmentation under Rainy and Dry Season Differences in a Dry Thermal Valley
title_sort optimization method of deep transfer learning for vegetation segmentation under rainy and dry season differences in a dry thermal valley
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10574146/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37836123
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/plants12193383
work_keys_str_mv AT chenyayong anoptimizationmethodofdeeptransferlearningforvegetationsegmentationunderrainyanddryseasondifferencesinadrythermalvalley
AT zhoubeibei anoptimizationmethodofdeeptransferlearningforvegetationsegmentationunderrainyanddryseasondifferencesinadrythermalvalley
AT yedapeng anoptimizationmethodofdeeptransferlearningforvegetationsegmentationunderrainyanddryseasondifferencesinadrythermalvalley
AT cuilei anoptimizationmethodofdeeptransferlearningforvegetationsegmentationunderrainyanddryseasondifferencesinadrythermalvalley
AT fenglei anoptimizationmethodofdeeptransferlearningforvegetationsegmentationunderrainyanddryseasondifferencesinadrythermalvalley
AT hanxiaojie anoptimizationmethodofdeeptransferlearningforvegetationsegmentationunderrainyanddryseasondifferencesinadrythermalvalley
AT chenyayong optimizationmethodofdeeptransferlearningforvegetationsegmentationunderrainyanddryseasondifferencesinadrythermalvalley
AT zhoubeibei optimizationmethodofdeeptransferlearningforvegetationsegmentationunderrainyanddryseasondifferencesinadrythermalvalley
AT yedapeng optimizationmethodofdeeptransferlearningforvegetationsegmentationunderrainyanddryseasondifferencesinadrythermalvalley
AT cuilei optimizationmethodofdeeptransferlearningforvegetationsegmentationunderrainyanddryseasondifferencesinadrythermalvalley
AT fenglei optimizationmethodofdeeptransferlearningforvegetationsegmentationunderrainyanddryseasondifferencesinadrythermalvalley
AT hanxiaojie optimizationmethodofdeeptransferlearningforvegetationsegmentationunderrainyanddryseasondifferencesinadrythermalvalley