Cargando…
Effects of Intrauterine Growth Restriction (IUGR) on Growth and Body Composition Compared to Constitutionally Small Infants
(1) Intrauterine growth restriction (IUGR) is associated with multiple morbidities including growth restriction and impaired neurodevelopment. Small for gestational age (SGA) is defined as a birth weight <10th percentile, regardless of the etiology. The term is commonly used as a proxy for IUGR,...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10574227/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37836441 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/nu15194158 |
_version_ | 1785120644722065408 |
---|---|
author | Calek, Elisabeth Binder, Julia Palmrich, Pilar Eibensteiner, Felix Thajer, Alexandra Kainz, Theresa Harreiter, Karin Berger, Angelika Binder, Christoph |
author_facet | Calek, Elisabeth Binder, Julia Palmrich, Pilar Eibensteiner, Felix Thajer, Alexandra Kainz, Theresa Harreiter, Karin Berger, Angelika Binder, Christoph |
author_sort | Calek, Elisabeth |
collection | PubMed |
description | (1) Intrauterine growth restriction (IUGR) is associated with multiple morbidities including growth restriction and impaired neurodevelopment. Small for gestational age (SGA) is defined as a birth weight <10th percentile, regardless of the etiology. The term is commonly used as a proxy for IUGR, but it may represent a healthy constitutionally small infant. Differentiating between IUGR and constitutionally small infants is essential for the nutritional management. (2) Infants born at <37 weeks of gestation between 2017 and 2022, who underwent body composition measurement (FFM: fat-free mass; FM: fat mass) at term-equivalent age, were included in this study. Infants with IUGR and constitutionally small infants (SGA) were compared to infants appropriate for gestational age (AGA). (3) A total of 300 infants (AGA: n = 249; IUGR: n = 40; SGA: n = 11) were analyzed. FFM (p < 0.001) and weight growth velocity (p = 0.022) were significantly lower in IUGR compared to AGA infants, but equal in SGA and AGA infants. FM was not significantly different between all groups. (4) The FFM Z-score was significantly lower in IUGR compared to AGA infants (p = 0.017). Being born constitutionally small compared to AGA had no impact on growth and body composition. These data showed that early aggressive nutritional management is essential in IUGR infants to avoid impaired growth and loss of FFM. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10574227 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-105742272023-10-14 Effects of Intrauterine Growth Restriction (IUGR) on Growth and Body Composition Compared to Constitutionally Small Infants Calek, Elisabeth Binder, Julia Palmrich, Pilar Eibensteiner, Felix Thajer, Alexandra Kainz, Theresa Harreiter, Karin Berger, Angelika Binder, Christoph Nutrients Article (1) Intrauterine growth restriction (IUGR) is associated with multiple morbidities including growth restriction and impaired neurodevelopment. Small for gestational age (SGA) is defined as a birth weight <10th percentile, regardless of the etiology. The term is commonly used as a proxy for IUGR, but it may represent a healthy constitutionally small infant. Differentiating between IUGR and constitutionally small infants is essential for the nutritional management. (2) Infants born at <37 weeks of gestation between 2017 and 2022, who underwent body composition measurement (FFM: fat-free mass; FM: fat mass) at term-equivalent age, were included in this study. Infants with IUGR and constitutionally small infants (SGA) were compared to infants appropriate for gestational age (AGA). (3) A total of 300 infants (AGA: n = 249; IUGR: n = 40; SGA: n = 11) were analyzed. FFM (p < 0.001) and weight growth velocity (p = 0.022) were significantly lower in IUGR compared to AGA infants, but equal in SGA and AGA infants. FM was not significantly different between all groups. (4) The FFM Z-score was significantly lower in IUGR compared to AGA infants (p = 0.017). Being born constitutionally small compared to AGA had no impact on growth and body composition. These data showed that early aggressive nutritional management is essential in IUGR infants to avoid impaired growth and loss of FFM. MDPI 2023-09-26 /pmc/articles/PMC10574227/ /pubmed/37836441 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/nu15194158 Text en © 2023 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Calek, Elisabeth Binder, Julia Palmrich, Pilar Eibensteiner, Felix Thajer, Alexandra Kainz, Theresa Harreiter, Karin Berger, Angelika Binder, Christoph Effects of Intrauterine Growth Restriction (IUGR) on Growth and Body Composition Compared to Constitutionally Small Infants |
title | Effects of Intrauterine Growth Restriction (IUGR) on Growth and Body Composition Compared to Constitutionally Small Infants |
title_full | Effects of Intrauterine Growth Restriction (IUGR) on Growth and Body Composition Compared to Constitutionally Small Infants |
title_fullStr | Effects of Intrauterine Growth Restriction (IUGR) on Growth and Body Composition Compared to Constitutionally Small Infants |
title_full_unstemmed | Effects of Intrauterine Growth Restriction (IUGR) on Growth and Body Composition Compared to Constitutionally Small Infants |
title_short | Effects of Intrauterine Growth Restriction (IUGR) on Growth and Body Composition Compared to Constitutionally Small Infants |
title_sort | effects of intrauterine growth restriction (iugr) on growth and body composition compared to constitutionally small infants |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10574227/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37836441 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/nu15194158 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT calekelisabeth effectsofintrauterinegrowthrestrictioniugrongrowthandbodycompositioncomparedtoconstitutionallysmallinfants AT binderjulia effectsofintrauterinegrowthrestrictioniugrongrowthandbodycompositioncomparedtoconstitutionallysmallinfants AT palmrichpilar effectsofintrauterinegrowthrestrictioniugrongrowthandbodycompositioncomparedtoconstitutionallysmallinfants AT eibensteinerfelix effectsofintrauterinegrowthrestrictioniugrongrowthandbodycompositioncomparedtoconstitutionallysmallinfants AT thajeralexandra effectsofintrauterinegrowthrestrictioniugrongrowthandbodycompositioncomparedtoconstitutionallysmallinfants AT kainztheresa effectsofintrauterinegrowthrestrictioniugrongrowthandbodycompositioncomparedtoconstitutionallysmallinfants AT harreiterkarin effectsofintrauterinegrowthrestrictioniugrongrowthandbodycompositioncomparedtoconstitutionallysmallinfants AT bergerangelika effectsofintrauterinegrowthrestrictioniugrongrowthandbodycompositioncomparedtoconstitutionallysmallinfants AT binderchristoph effectsofintrauterinegrowthrestrictioniugrongrowthandbodycompositioncomparedtoconstitutionallysmallinfants |