Cargando…

Effects of Intrauterine Growth Restriction (IUGR) on Growth and Body Composition Compared to Constitutionally Small Infants

(1) Intrauterine growth restriction (IUGR) is associated with multiple morbidities including growth restriction and impaired neurodevelopment. Small for gestational age (SGA) is defined as a birth weight <10th percentile, regardless of the etiology. The term is commonly used as a proxy for IUGR,...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Calek, Elisabeth, Binder, Julia, Palmrich, Pilar, Eibensteiner, Felix, Thajer, Alexandra, Kainz, Theresa, Harreiter, Karin, Berger, Angelika, Binder, Christoph
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10574227/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37836441
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/nu15194158
_version_ 1785120644722065408
author Calek, Elisabeth
Binder, Julia
Palmrich, Pilar
Eibensteiner, Felix
Thajer, Alexandra
Kainz, Theresa
Harreiter, Karin
Berger, Angelika
Binder, Christoph
author_facet Calek, Elisabeth
Binder, Julia
Palmrich, Pilar
Eibensteiner, Felix
Thajer, Alexandra
Kainz, Theresa
Harreiter, Karin
Berger, Angelika
Binder, Christoph
author_sort Calek, Elisabeth
collection PubMed
description (1) Intrauterine growth restriction (IUGR) is associated with multiple morbidities including growth restriction and impaired neurodevelopment. Small for gestational age (SGA) is defined as a birth weight <10th percentile, regardless of the etiology. The term is commonly used as a proxy for IUGR, but it may represent a healthy constitutionally small infant. Differentiating between IUGR and constitutionally small infants is essential for the nutritional management. (2) Infants born at <37 weeks of gestation between 2017 and 2022, who underwent body composition measurement (FFM: fat-free mass; FM: fat mass) at term-equivalent age, were included in this study. Infants with IUGR and constitutionally small infants (SGA) were compared to infants appropriate for gestational age (AGA). (3) A total of 300 infants (AGA: n = 249; IUGR: n = 40; SGA: n = 11) were analyzed. FFM (p < 0.001) and weight growth velocity (p = 0.022) were significantly lower in IUGR compared to AGA infants, but equal in SGA and AGA infants. FM was not significantly different between all groups. (4) The FFM Z-score was significantly lower in IUGR compared to AGA infants (p = 0.017). Being born constitutionally small compared to AGA had no impact on growth and body composition. These data showed that early aggressive nutritional management is essential in IUGR infants to avoid impaired growth and loss of FFM.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10574227
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-105742272023-10-14 Effects of Intrauterine Growth Restriction (IUGR) on Growth and Body Composition Compared to Constitutionally Small Infants Calek, Elisabeth Binder, Julia Palmrich, Pilar Eibensteiner, Felix Thajer, Alexandra Kainz, Theresa Harreiter, Karin Berger, Angelika Binder, Christoph Nutrients Article (1) Intrauterine growth restriction (IUGR) is associated with multiple morbidities including growth restriction and impaired neurodevelopment. Small for gestational age (SGA) is defined as a birth weight <10th percentile, regardless of the etiology. The term is commonly used as a proxy for IUGR, but it may represent a healthy constitutionally small infant. Differentiating between IUGR and constitutionally small infants is essential for the nutritional management. (2) Infants born at <37 weeks of gestation between 2017 and 2022, who underwent body composition measurement (FFM: fat-free mass; FM: fat mass) at term-equivalent age, were included in this study. Infants with IUGR and constitutionally small infants (SGA) were compared to infants appropriate for gestational age (AGA). (3) A total of 300 infants (AGA: n = 249; IUGR: n = 40; SGA: n = 11) were analyzed. FFM (p < 0.001) and weight growth velocity (p = 0.022) were significantly lower in IUGR compared to AGA infants, but equal in SGA and AGA infants. FM was not significantly different between all groups. (4) The FFM Z-score was significantly lower in IUGR compared to AGA infants (p = 0.017). Being born constitutionally small compared to AGA had no impact on growth and body composition. These data showed that early aggressive nutritional management is essential in IUGR infants to avoid impaired growth and loss of FFM. MDPI 2023-09-26 /pmc/articles/PMC10574227/ /pubmed/37836441 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/nu15194158 Text en © 2023 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Calek, Elisabeth
Binder, Julia
Palmrich, Pilar
Eibensteiner, Felix
Thajer, Alexandra
Kainz, Theresa
Harreiter, Karin
Berger, Angelika
Binder, Christoph
Effects of Intrauterine Growth Restriction (IUGR) on Growth and Body Composition Compared to Constitutionally Small Infants
title Effects of Intrauterine Growth Restriction (IUGR) on Growth and Body Composition Compared to Constitutionally Small Infants
title_full Effects of Intrauterine Growth Restriction (IUGR) on Growth and Body Composition Compared to Constitutionally Small Infants
title_fullStr Effects of Intrauterine Growth Restriction (IUGR) on Growth and Body Composition Compared to Constitutionally Small Infants
title_full_unstemmed Effects of Intrauterine Growth Restriction (IUGR) on Growth and Body Composition Compared to Constitutionally Small Infants
title_short Effects of Intrauterine Growth Restriction (IUGR) on Growth and Body Composition Compared to Constitutionally Small Infants
title_sort effects of intrauterine growth restriction (iugr) on growth and body composition compared to constitutionally small infants
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10574227/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37836441
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/nu15194158
work_keys_str_mv AT calekelisabeth effectsofintrauterinegrowthrestrictioniugrongrowthandbodycompositioncomparedtoconstitutionallysmallinfants
AT binderjulia effectsofintrauterinegrowthrestrictioniugrongrowthandbodycompositioncomparedtoconstitutionallysmallinfants
AT palmrichpilar effectsofintrauterinegrowthrestrictioniugrongrowthandbodycompositioncomparedtoconstitutionallysmallinfants
AT eibensteinerfelix effectsofintrauterinegrowthrestrictioniugrongrowthandbodycompositioncomparedtoconstitutionallysmallinfants
AT thajeralexandra effectsofintrauterinegrowthrestrictioniugrongrowthandbodycompositioncomparedtoconstitutionallysmallinfants
AT kainztheresa effectsofintrauterinegrowthrestrictioniugrongrowthandbodycompositioncomparedtoconstitutionallysmallinfants
AT harreiterkarin effectsofintrauterinegrowthrestrictioniugrongrowthandbodycompositioncomparedtoconstitutionallysmallinfants
AT bergerangelika effectsofintrauterinegrowthrestrictioniugrongrowthandbodycompositioncomparedtoconstitutionallysmallinfants
AT binderchristoph effectsofintrauterinegrowthrestrictioniugrongrowthandbodycompositioncomparedtoconstitutionallysmallinfants