Cargando…

Study on Porosity of Thermal-Sprayed Commercially Pure Aluminum Coating

Porosity is closely related to the corrosion and wear properties of a coating processed by thermal-spraying technology, and the quantitative characterization of porosity is a crucial part of the research on coating structures. The current image analysis method often uses the mechanical polishing met...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Li, Bo, Fan, Lei, Bai, Jie, He, Jinhang, Su, Jianfeng, Wang, Song, Deng, Chao, Liu, Shifeng, Zhang, Zhiqing
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10574577/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37834748
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ma16196612
_version_ 1785120725112193024
author Li, Bo
Fan, Lei
Bai, Jie
He, Jinhang
Su, Jianfeng
Wang, Song
Deng, Chao
Liu, Shifeng
Zhang, Zhiqing
author_facet Li, Bo
Fan, Lei
Bai, Jie
He, Jinhang
Su, Jianfeng
Wang, Song
Deng, Chao
Liu, Shifeng
Zhang, Zhiqing
author_sort Li, Bo
collection PubMed
description Porosity is closely related to the corrosion and wear properties of a coating processed by thermal-spraying technology, and the quantitative characterization of porosity is a crucial part of the research on coating structures. The current image analysis method often uses the mechanical polishing method recommended by ISO to measure a coating porosity. This method has been proved to be an effective method for the characterization of oxide coatings. However, due to the significant differences in the physical and chemical properties between aluminum and oxides, this method may not be suitable for aluminum coatings, and a more appropriate approach needs to be explored. In this paper, the effects of three polishing technologies (mechanical polishing, argon-ion-beam polishing, and electrolytic polishing) on the porosity measurement of pure aluminum coatings were compared and studied. The research results showed that the commonly used mechanical polishing method and more advanced argon-ion-beam polishing method could not completely reveal the pore structure because SiC particles would be embedded in the pure aluminum coatings during mechanical polishing, filling large pores. Although electrolytic polishing technology had advantages in revealing the macroporous structure, it would introduce a microporous structure and oxides, which would affect the measurement of the coating porosity. The composite polishing technology (electrolytic polishing + argon-ion-beam polishing) could perfectly reveal the pore structure in the pure-aluminum coating, and the porosity of arc-sprayed aluminum coating was 9.9%, which was close to the macroscopic true value measured using the weighing method of 10.2%.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10574577
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-105745772023-10-14 Study on Porosity of Thermal-Sprayed Commercially Pure Aluminum Coating Li, Bo Fan, Lei Bai, Jie He, Jinhang Su, Jianfeng Wang, Song Deng, Chao Liu, Shifeng Zhang, Zhiqing Materials (Basel) Article Porosity is closely related to the corrosion and wear properties of a coating processed by thermal-spraying technology, and the quantitative characterization of porosity is a crucial part of the research on coating structures. The current image analysis method often uses the mechanical polishing method recommended by ISO to measure a coating porosity. This method has been proved to be an effective method for the characterization of oxide coatings. However, due to the significant differences in the physical and chemical properties between aluminum and oxides, this method may not be suitable for aluminum coatings, and a more appropriate approach needs to be explored. In this paper, the effects of three polishing technologies (mechanical polishing, argon-ion-beam polishing, and electrolytic polishing) on the porosity measurement of pure aluminum coatings were compared and studied. The research results showed that the commonly used mechanical polishing method and more advanced argon-ion-beam polishing method could not completely reveal the pore structure because SiC particles would be embedded in the pure aluminum coatings during mechanical polishing, filling large pores. Although electrolytic polishing technology had advantages in revealing the macroporous structure, it would introduce a microporous structure and oxides, which would affect the measurement of the coating porosity. The composite polishing technology (electrolytic polishing + argon-ion-beam polishing) could perfectly reveal the pore structure in the pure-aluminum coating, and the porosity of arc-sprayed aluminum coating was 9.9%, which was close to the macroscopic true value measured using the weighing method of 10.2%. MDPI 2023-10-09 /pmc/articles/PMC10574577/ /pubmed/37834748 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ma16196612 Text en © 2023 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Li, Bo
Fan, Lei
Bai, Jie
He, Jinhang
Su, Jianfeng
Wang, Song
Deng, Chao
Liu, Shifeng
Zhang, Zhiqing
Study on Porosity of Thermal-Sprayed Commercially Pure Aluminum Coating
title Study on Porosity of Thermal-Sprayed Commercially Pure Aluminum Coating
title_full Study on Porosity of Thermal-Sprayed Commercially Pure Aluminum Coating
title_fullStr Study on Porosity of Thermal-Sprayed Commercially Pure Aluminum Coating
title_full_unstemmed Study on Porosity of Thermal-Sprayed Commercially Pure Aluminum Coating
title_short Study on Porosity of Thermal-Sprayed Commercially Pure Aluminum Coating
title_sort study on porosity of thermal-sprayed commercially pure aluminum coating
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10574577/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37834748
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ma16196612
work_keys_str_mv AT libo studyonporosityofthermalsprayedcommerciallypurealuminumcoating
AT fanlei studyonporosityofthermalsprayedcommerciallypurealuminumcoating
AT baijie studyonporosityofthermalsprayedcommerciallypurealuminumcoating
AT hejinhang studyonporosityofthermalsprayedcommerciallypurealuminumcoating
AT sujianfeng studyonporosityofthermalsprayedcommerciallypurealuminumcoating
AT wangsong studyonporosityofthermalsprayedcommerciallypurealuminumcoating
AT dengchao studyonporosityofthermalsprayedcommerciallypurealuminumcoating
AT liushifeng studyonporosityofthermalsprayedcommerciallypurealuminumcoating
AT zhangzhiqing studyonporosityofthermalsprayedcommerciallypurealuminumcoating