Cargando…

Delamination Strength Comparison of Additively Manufactured Composite Curved Beams Using Continuous Fibers

The objective of this study is to show the applicability of various 3D-printed composite curved beams using continuous fibers and their delamination strength when they are subjected to bending loading. Four-point bending tests are configured for comparative research on evaluating the effect of fiber...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Süsler, Sedat, Kazancı, Zafer
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10575076/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37835977
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/polym15193928
_version_ 1785120839224524800
author Süsler, Sedat
Kazancı, Zafer
author_facet Süsler, Sedat
Kazancı, Zafer
author_sort Süsler, Sedat
collection PubMed
description The objective of this study is to show the applicability of various 3D-printed composite curved beams using continuous fibers and their delamination strength when they are subjected to bending loading. Four-point bending tests are configured for comparative research on evaluating the effect of fiber types on the delamination strength and failure mode. Out-of-plane tensile properties are calculated analytically by using experimental data. The number of curved beams per build during multiple printing is examined to observe the effect of delay time between each deposited layer of parts. Macro-scale finite element simulations including surface-based cohesive concept for the selected 3D-printed composite curved beam design are also presented and compared. The analytical results show that carbon fiber reinforced curved beam design is superior to the other fiber types by at least 18% in the interlaminar tensile strength and is relatively challenging against the conventionally manufactured composite curved beams in the literature despite its low fiber volume ratio. There is no gross effect of delay time between each deposited layer of parts, although printing a single sample is favorable for better strength. There is a presence of compatibility between the analytical and numerical results as the percentage difference for maximum load, radial tensile strength and maximum displacement are found as 1.8%, 2.4% and 1.5%, respectively, in a 3D cohesive model. A 2D cohesive model offers a fast solution and a competitive agreement with test results when the 2D and 3D finite element models are compared.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10575076
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-105750762023-10-14 Delamination Strength Comparison of Additively Manufactured Composite Curved Beams Using Continuous Fibers Süsler, Sedat Kazancı, Zafer Polymers (Basel) Article The objective of this study is to show the applicability of various 3D-printed composite curved beams using continuous fibers and their delamination strength when they are subjected to bending loading. Four-point bending tests are configured for comparative research on evaluating the effect of fiber types on the delamination strength and failure mode. Out-of-plane tensile properties are calculated analytically by using experimental data. The number of curved beams per build during multiple printing is examined to observe the effect of delay time between each deposited layer of parts. Macro-scale finite element simulations including surface-based cohesive concept for the selected 3D-printed composite curved beam design are also presented and compared. The analytical results show that carbon fiber reinforced curved beam design is superior to the other fiber types by at least 18% in the interlaminar tensile strength and is relatively challenging against the conventionally manufactured composite curved beams in the literature despite its low fiber volume ratio. There is no gross effect of delay time between each deposited layer of parts, although printing a single sample is favorable for better strength. There is a presence of compatibility between the analytical and numerical results as the percentage difference for maximum load, radial tensile strength and maximum displacement are found as 1.8%, 2.4% and 1.5%, respectively, in a 3D cohesive model. A 2D cohesive model offers a fast solution and a competitive agreement with test results when the 2D and 3D finite element models are compared. MDPI 2023-09-28 /pmc/articles/PMC10575076/ /pubmed/37835977 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/polym15193928 Text en © 2023 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Süsler, Sedat
Kazancı, Zafer
Delamination Strength Comparison of Additively Manufactured Composite Curved Beams Using Continuous Fibers
title Delamination Strength Comparison of Additively Manufactured Composite Curved Beams Using Continuous Fibers
title_full Delamination Strength Comparison of Additively Manufactured Composite Curved Beams Using Continuous Fibers
title_fullStr Delamination Strength Comparison of Additively Manufactured Composite Curved Beams Using Continuous Fibers
title_full_unstemmed Delamination Strength Comparison of Additively Manufactured Composite Curved Beams Using Continuous Fibers
title_short Delamination Strength Comparison of Additively Manufactured Composite Curved Beams Using Continuous Fibers
title_sort delamination strength comparison of additively manufactured composite curved beams using continuous fibers
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10575076/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37835977
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/polym15193928
work_keys_str_mv AT suslersedat delaminationstrengthcomparisonofadditivelymanufacturedcompositecurvedbeamsusingcontinuousfibers
AT kazancızafer delaminationstrengthcomparisonofadditivelymanufacturedcompositecurvedbeamsusingcontinuousfibers