Cargando…

Concurrent Validity and Reliability of the Sprint Force–Velocity Profile Assessed with K-AI Wearable Tech

Establishing a sprint acceleration force–velocity profile is a way to assess an athlete’s sprint-specific strength and speed production capacities. It can be determined in field condition using GNSS-based (global navigation satellite system) devices. The aims of this study were to (1) assess the int...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Vantieghem-Nicolas, Laurine, Morin, Jean-Benoit, Cotte, Thierry, Sangnier, Sébastien, Rossi, Jeremy
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10575115/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37837018
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s23198189
_version_ 1785120850875252736
author Vantieghem-Nicolas, Laurine
Morin, Jean-Benoit
Cotte, Thierry
Sangnier, Sébastien
Rossi, Jeremy
author_facet Vantieghem-Nicolas, Laurine
Morin, Jean-Benoit
Cotte, Thierry
Sangnier, Sébastien
Rossi, Jeremy
author_sort Vantieghem-Nicolas, Laurine
collection PubMed
description Establishing a sprint acceleration force–velocity profile is a way to assess an athlete’s sprint-specific strength and speed production capacities. It can be determined in field condition using GNSS-based (global navigation satellite system) devices. The aims of this study were to (1) assess the inter-unit and the inter-trial reliability of the force–velocity profile variables obtained with K-AI Wearable Tech devices (50 Hz), (2) assess the concurrent validity of the input variables (maximal sprint speed and acceleration time constant), and (3) assess the validity of the output variables (maximal force output, running velocity and power). Twelve subjects, including one girl, performed forty-one 30 m sprints in total, during which the running speed was measured using two GPS (global positioning system) devices placed on the upper back and a radar (Stalker(®) Pro II Sports Radar Gun). Concurrent validity, inter-device and inter-trial reliability analyses were carried out for the input and output variables. Very strong to poor correlation (0.99 to 0.38) was observed for the different variables between the GPS and radar devices, with typical errors ranging from small to large (all < 7.6%). Inter-unit reliability was excellent to moderate depending on the variable (ICC values between 0.65 and 0.99). Finally, for the inter-trial reliability, the coefficients of variation were low to very low (all < 5.6%) for the radar and the GPS. The K-AI Wearable Tech used in this study is a concurrently valid and reliable alternative to radar for assessing a sprint acceleration force–velocity profile.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10575115
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-105751152023-10-14 Concurrent Validity and Reliability of the Sprint Force–Velocity Profile Assessed with K-AI Wearable Tech Vantieghem-Nicolas, Laurine Morin, Jean-Benoit Cotte, Thierry Sangnier, Sébastien Rossi, Jeremy Sensors (Basel) Article Establishing a sprint acceleration force–velocity profile is a way to assess an athlete’s sprint-specific strength and speed production capacities. It can be determined in field condition using GNSS-based (global navigation satellite system) devices. The aims of this study were to (1) assess the inter-unit and the inter-trial reliability of the force–velocity profile variables obtained with K-AI Wearable Tech devices (50 Hz), (2) assess the concurrent validity of the input variables (maximal sprint speed and acceleration time constant), and (3) assess the validity of the output variables (maximal force output, running velocity and power). Twelve subjects, including one girl, performed forty-one 30 m sprints in total, during which the running speed was measured using two GPS (global positioning system) devices placed on the upper back and a radar (Stalker(®) Pro II Sports Radar Gun). Concurrent validity, inter-device and inter-trial reliability analyses were carried out for the input and output variables. Very strong to poor correlation (0.99 to 0.38) was observed for the different variables between the GPS and radar devices, with typical errors ranging from small to large (all < 7.6%). Inter-unit reliability was excellent to moderate depending on the variable (ICC values between 0.65 and 0.99). Finally, for the inter-trial reliability, the coefficients of variation were low to very low (all < 5.6%) for the radar and the GPS. The K-AI Wearable Tech used in this study is a concurrently valid and reliable alternative to radar for assessing a sprint acceleration force–velocity profile. MDPI 2023-09-30 /pmc/articles/PMC10575115/ /pubmed/37837018 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s23198189 Text en © 2023 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Vantieghem-Nicolas, Laurine
Morin, Jean-Benoit
Cotte, Thierry
Sangnier, Sébastien
Rossi, Jeremy
Concurrent Validity and Reliability of the Sprint Force–Velocity Profile Assessed with K-AI Wearable Tech
title Concurrent Validity and Reliability of the Sprint Force–Velocity Profile Assessed with K-AI Wearable Tech
title_full Concurrent Validity and Reliability of the Sprint Force–Velocity Profile Assessed with K-AI Wearable Tech
title_fullStr Concurrent Validity and Reliability of the Sprint Force–Velocity Profile Assessed with K-AI Wearable Tech
title_full_unstemmed Concurrent Validity and Reliability of the Sprint Force–Velocity Profile Assessed with K-AI Wearable Tech
title_short Concurrent Validity and Reliability of the Sprint Force–Velocity Profile Assessed with K-AI Wearable Tech
title_sort concurrent validity and reliability of the sprint force–velocity profile assessed with k-ai wearable tech
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10575115/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37837018
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s23198189
work_keys_str_mv AT vantieghemnicolaslaurine concurrentvalidityandreliabilityofthesprintforcevelocityprofileassessedwithkaiwearabletech
AT morinjeanbenoit concurrentvalidityandreliabilityofthesprintforcevelocityprofileassessedwithkaiwearabletech
AT cottethierry concurrentvalidityandreliabilityofthesprintforcevelocityprofileassessedwithkaiwearabletech
AT sangniersebastien concurrentvalidityandreliabilityofthesprintforcevelocityprofileassessedwithkaiwearabletech
AT rossijeremy concurrentvalidityandreliabilityofthesprintforcevelocityprofileassessedwithkaiwearabletech