Cargando…
Not one, but many: developing a multi-indication pricing model for medicines in Belgium
Back ground: Current pricing and reimbursement models that focus on one indication at a time are not suited to address the market access of multi-indication medicines. Therefore, the aim of this study is to co-create with Belgian stakeholders a multi-indication pricing model and procedural pathway,...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10575738/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37841908 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fphar.2023.1199253 |
_version_ | 1785120974267482112 |
---|---|
author | Maes, Ingrid Kok, Eline De Torck, Pieter-Jan Mestre-Ferrandiz, Jorge Simoens, Steven |
author_facet | Maes, Ingrid Kok, Eline De Torck, Pieter-Jan Mestre-Ferrandiz, Jorge Simoens, Steven |
author_sort | Maes, Ingrid |
collection | PubMed |
description | Back ground: Current pricing and reimbursement models that focus on one indication at a time are not suited to address the market access of multi-indication medicines. Therefore, the aim of this study is to co-create with Belgian stakeholders a multi-indication pricing model and procedural pathway, to identify conditions for implementation, and to illustrate the multi-indication pricing model with a case study. Methods: Different multi-indication pricing models were identified from the literature, case studies and pilots in other countries. Semi-structured interviews were conducted with 21 representatives from the National Institute for Health and Disability Insurance, insurance funds, clinicians, patients, the policy cell of the Minister of Health, pharmaceutical industry and academia. These provided insight in the opinions of stakeholders about possible multi-indication pricing models and their feasibility in the Belgian context. Agreement on the preferred multi-indication pricing model and procedural pathway was reached in a multi-stakeholder round table. Results: The international review generated four main multi-indication pricing models that vary in terms of whether a uniform price or differential prices are applied, whether prices are adjusted for the volume and/or value of the medicine in each indication, and whether a proactive or retroactive dynamic pricing approach is used. However, Belgian stakeholders preferred a fifth model, which sets a single price as the volume- and value-weighted average price across all indications at launch. Over time, the price is adapted based on volume and value of the medicine in real-life practice for each indication. To implement this model, a legal framework, horizon scanning and early dialogue, data infrastructure, an evidence plan for the medicine, technical expertise and governance model need to be developed. Conclusion: Although the multi-indication pricing model preferred by Belgian stakeholders raises the administrative burden, it allows for the price of a medicine to vary during the lifecycle based on its initial and real-life performance in multiple indications. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10575738 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | Frontiers Media S.A. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-105757382023-10-14 Not one, but many: developing a multi-indication pricing model for medicines in Belgium Maes, Ingrid Kok, Eline De Torck, Pieter-Jan Mestre-Ferrandiz, Jorge Simoens, Steven Front Pharmacol Pharmacology Back ground: Current pricing and reimbursement models that focus on one indication at a time are not suited to address the market access of multi-indication medicines. Therefore, the aim of this study is to co-create with Belgian stakeholders a multi-indication pricing model and procedural pathway, to identify conditions for implementation, and to illustrate the multi-indication pricing model with a case study. Methods: Different multi-indication pricing models were identified from the literature, case studies and pilots in other countries. Semi-structured interviews were conducted with 21 representatives from the National Institute for Health and Disability Insurance, insurance funds, clinicians, patients, the policy cell of the Minister of Health, pharmaceutical industry and academia. These provided insight in the opinions of stakeholders about possible multi-indication pricing models and their feasibility in the Belgian context. Agreement on the preferred multi-indication pricing model and procedural pathway was reached in a multi-stakeholder round table. Results: The international review generated four main multi-indication pricing models that vary in terms of whether a uniform price or differential prices are applied, whether prices are adjusted for the volume and/or value of the medicine in each indication, and whether a proactive or retroactive dynamic pricing approach is used. However, Belgian stakeholders preferred a fifth model, which sets a single price as the volume- and value-weighted average price across all indications at launch. Over time, the price is adapted based on volume and value of the medicine in real-life practice for each indication. To implement this model, a legal framework, horizon scanning and early dialogue, data infrastructure, an evidence plan for the medicine, technical expertise and governance model need to be developed. Conclusion: Although the multi-indication pricing model preferred by Belgian stakeholders raises the administrative burden, it allows for the price of a medicine to vary during the lifecycle based on its initial and real-life performance in multiple indications. Frontiers Media S.A. 2023-09-28 /pmc/articles/PMC10575738/ /pubmed/37841908 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fphar.2023.1199253 Text en Copyright © 2023 Maes, Kok, De Torck, Mestre-Ferrandiz and Simoens. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms. |
spellingShingle | Pharmacology Maes, Ingrid Kok, Eline De Torck, Pieter-Jan Mestre-Ferrandiz, Jorge Simoens, Steven Not one, but many: developing a multi-indication pricing model for medicines in Belgium |
title | Not one, but many: developing a multi-indication pricing model for medicines in Belgium |
title_full | Not one, but many: developing a multi-indication pricing model for medicines in Belgium |
title_fullStr | Not one, but many: developing a multi-indication pricing model for medicines in Belgium |
title_full_unstemmed | Not one, but many: developing a multi-indication pricing model for medicines in Belgium |
title_short | Not one, but many: developing a multi-indication pricing model for medicines in Belgium |
title_sort | not one, but many: developing a multi-indication pricing model for medicines in belgium |
topic | Pharmacology |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10575738/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37841908 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fphar.2023.1199253 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT maesingrid notonebutmanydevelopingamultiindicationpricingmodelformedicinesinbelgium AT kokeline notonebutmanydevelopingamultiindicationpricingmodelformedicinesinbelgium AT detorckpieterjan notonebutmanydevelopingamultiindicationpricingmodelformedicinesinbelgium AT mestreferrandizjorge notonebutmanydevelopingamultiindicationpricingmodelformedicinesinbelgium AT simoenssteven notonebutmanydevelopingamultiindicationpricingmodelformedicinesinbelgium |